OBJECTIVES: Vascular access (VA) stenoses play a significant role in the morbidity of the haemodialysed population. Classifications for diagnosis, assessment and proposal of treatment strategies can be useful clinical and methodological tools. This review aims to present a comprehensive summary and propose further methodological approaches. DESIGN: A systematic review of the literature, evaluating classifications for dialysis-related VA stenosis. DATA SOURCES: Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, Google Scholar and the ClinicalTrials.gov registry were searched from inception to 7 December 2024. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: All articles containing classifications regarding dialysis VA were eligible, with no restrictions on the study type or language of the full text. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent researchers performed the search and initial screening. Four vascular surgeons assessed the included classifications using a modified Buchbinder's critical appraisal tool to evaluate quality. RESULTS: From 4771 screened papers, 59 full-text papers were retrieved and 24 articles contained classifications. Three classifications were dedicated to VA stenosis, all based on the anatomical location of lesions. According to the modified Buchbinder's appraisal, the classifications were assessed as moderate-to-good quality. The literature disposes of immense inconsistency in terms of the definition of significant stenosis indicated for treatment. CONCLUSIONS: VA significant stenosis and its classification is a non-uniformly understood issue with many different criteria and categorisations. This basic methodological problem leads to inconsistent results. We recommend the unification of the criteria and their validation in prospective studies.
- Klíčová slova
- Cardiovascular Disease, Dialysis, End stage renal failure, Vascular medicine, Vascular surgery,
- MeSH
- arteriovenózní zkrat * škodlivé účinky MeSH
- cévní přístupy * škodlivé účinky MeSH
- dialýza ledvin * škodlivé účinky MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- stenóza klasifikace etiologie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- scoping review MeSH
BACKROUND: The use of arteriovenous graft is indicated in patients if the subcutaneous venous bed is exhausted or unsuitable for arteriovenous fistula creation. The leading cause of failure of a prosthetic arteriovenous hemodialysis-access graft is venous anastomotic stenosis causing thrombosis of the graft. A number of surgical techniques and endovascular tools have been used to treat this stenosis and thrombosis. None have yet proven to be ideal. This study was designed to evaluate the results of hybrid treatment of arteriovenous graft thrombosis associated with venous anastomotic stenosis. METHODS: Over the period 2013-2014, we treated 16 AVG occlusions. Immediately after the diagnosis of occlusion was made, the patients underwent thrombectomy using a Fogarty catheter. After thrombectomy, a diagnostic fistulogram was performed and if VAG stenosis was confirmed, it was treated with balloon angioplasty and stent graft introduction. Lesions were dilated to reduce the stenosis in the treated area to less than 25%. RESULTS: Primary patency after 12 months was 32.8%. Primary assisted patency was 44.7%, secondary patency was 47.6%. Restenosis of the stent graft was seen in two patients. Recurring AVG occlusion was observed in four patients. The average number of interventions to maintain AVG patency was 1.18 per patient/1 year of dialysis. CONCLUSION: Treatment of AVG thrombosis due to VAG stenosis by hybrid procedure proved to be effective and improved secondary patency.
- Klíčová slova
- AVG thrombosis, arteriovenous graft for hemodialysis (AVG), stent graft, surgical thrombectomy, venous anastomotic stenosis (VAG),
- MeSH
- cévní přístupy škodlivé účinky MeSH
- dialýza ledvin * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- magnetická rezonanční angiografie MeSH
- okluze cévního štěpu chirurgie MeSH
- přežívání štěpu MeSH
- průchodnost cév MeSH
- stenty MeSH
- trombektomie metody MeSH
- trombóza chirurgie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
Central venous catheter (CVC)-related problems, risks and safety hazards are partly caused by different characteristics of the CVC-based access and their performance features. This chapter covers those issues in a chronological order, from factors related to the choice of the CVC, insertion site and insertion procedure itself, over those associated with CVC use and their monitoring up to safety hazards of interventional procedures. Not discussed are CVC infections as they are covered in a separate chapter in this book.
- MeSH
- bezpečnost pacientů * MeSH
- cévní přístupy škodlivé účinky klasifikace MeSH
- chronická renální insuficience terapie MeSH
- design vybavení MeSH
- dialýza ledvin škodlivé účinky přístrojové vybavení metody MeSH
- dodržování směrnic MeSH
- kontrola infekce MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- průchodnost cév fyziologie MeSH
- rizikové faktory MeSH
- trombóza epidemiologie prevence a kontrola MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
More than 50% of all end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients die from cardiovascular complications. Among them, heart failure and pulmonary hypertension play a major role, and published studies document significantly higher mortality rates in patients with these two states. Arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) and arteriovenous grafts (AVG) are the preferred types of vascular access (VA). However, both AVF and AVG increase cardiac output and in turn could contribute to (the decompensation of) heart failure or pulmonary hypertension. No really safe access flow volume exists, and the ESRD patients' reactions to it vary considerably. We review the mechanisms involved in the cardiovascular consequences of increased cardiac output and available literary data. The link between access flow volume and increased mortality due to pulmonary hypertension or heart failure probably exists, but still has not been directly evidenced. Regular echocardiography is advisable especially in patients with symptoms or with high VA flow (>1,500 ml/min).
- MeSH
- arteriovenózní zkrat škodlivé účinky MeSH
- bezpečnost pacientů * MeSH
- cévní přístupy škodlivé účinky MeSH
- chronické selhání ledvin terapie MeSH
- dialýza ledvin škodlivé účinky MeSH
- echokardiografie MeSH
- hemodynamika fyziologie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- minutový srdeční výdej fyziologie MeSH
- plicní hypertenze etiologie patofyziologie prevence a kontrola MeSH
- srdeční selhání etiologie patofyziologie prevence a kontrola MeSH
- údržba MeSH
- výkony cévní chirurgie škodlivé účinky MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- MeSH
- cévní přístupy škodlivé účinky MeSH
- dialýza ledvin škodlivé účinky přístrojové vybavení metody MeSH
- kongresy jako téma MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
- MeSH
- bolesti na hrudi diagnostické zobrazování etiologie MeSH
- cévní přístupy škodlivé účinky MeSH
- cizí tělesa komplikace diagnostické zobrazování chirurgie MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- hrudní chirurgie video-asistovaná MeSH
- katetrizace centrálních vén škodlivé účinky přístrojové vybavení MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- odstranění implantátu metody MeSH
- počítačová rentgenová tomografie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- kazuistiky MeSH