Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are major causes of hospital-acquired infections and sepsis. Due to increasing antibiotic resistance, new treatments are needed. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have antimicrobial effects, which can be enhanced by preconditioning with antibiotics. This study investigated using antibiotics to strengthen MSCs against MRSA and P. aeruginosa. MSCs were preconditioned with linezolid, vancomycin, meropenem, or cephalosporin. Optimal antibiotic concentrations were determined by assessing MSC survival. Antimicrobial effects were measured by minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC), and antimicrobial peptide (AMP) gene expression. Optimal antibiotic concentrations for preconditioning MSCs without reducing viability were 1 μg/mL for linezolid, meropenem, and cephalosporin and 2 μg/mL for vancomycin. In MIC assays, MSCs preconditioned with linezolid, vancomycin, meropenem, or cephalosporin inhibited MRSA or P. aeruginosa growth at lower concentrations than non-preconditioned MSCs (p ≤ 0.001). In MBC assays, preconditioned MSCs showed enhanced bacterial clearance compared to non-preconditioned MSCs, especially when linezolid and vancomycin were used against MRSA (p ≤ 0.05). Preconditioned MSCs showed increased expression of genes encoding the antimicrobial peptide genes hepcidin and LL-37 compared to non-preconditioned MSCs. The highest hepcidin expression was seen with linezolid and vancomycin preconditioning (p ≤ 0.001). The highest LL-37 expression was with linezolid preconditioning (p ≤ 0.001). MSCs' preconditioning with linezolid, vancomycin, meropenem, or cephalosporin at optimal concentrations enhances their antimicrobial effects against MRSA and P. aeruginosa without compromising viability. This suggests preconditioned MSCs could be an effective adjuvant treatment for antibiotic-resistant infections. The mechanism may involve upregulation of AMP genes.

• Klíčová slova
• Hepcidin, LL-37, Linezolid, Mesenchymal stem cells, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Vancomycin,
• MeSH
• antibakteriální látky farmakologie   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• antimikrobiální peptidy MeSH
• cefalosporiny farmakologie   MeSH
• hepcidiny farmakologie   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• linezolid farmakologie   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• meropenem farmakologie   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• methicilin rezistentní Staphylococcus aureus * MeSH
• mezenchymální kmenové buňky * MeSH
• mikrobiální testy citlivosti MeSH
• Pseudomonas aeruginosa genetika   MeSH
• stafylokokové infekce * mikrobiologie   MeSH
• vankomycin MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• Názvy látek
• antibakteriální látky MeSH
• antimikrobiální peptidy MeSH
• cefalosporiny MeSH
• hepcidiny MeSH
• linezolid MeSH
• meropenem MeSH
• vankomycin MeSH

Background: Treatment with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) has elicited considerable interest as an adjunctive therapy in sepsis. However, the encouraging effects of experiments with MSC in rodents have not been adequately studied in large-animal models with better relevance to human sepsis. Objectives: Here, we aimed to assess safety and efficacy of bone marrow-derived MSCs in a clinically relevant porcine model of progressive peritonitis-induced sepsis. Methods: Thirty-two anesthetized, mechanically ventilated, and instrumented pigs were randomly assigned into four groups (n = 8 per group): (1) sham-operated group (CONTROL); (2) sham-operated group treated with MSCs (MSC-CONTROL); (3) sepsis group with standard supportive care (SEPSIS); and (4) sepsis group treated with MSCs (MSC-SEPSIS). Peritoneal sepsis was induced by inoculating cultivated autologous feces. MSCs (1 × 106/kg) were administered intravenously at 6 h after sepsis induction. Results: Before, 12, 18, and 24 h after the induction of peritonitis, we measured systemic, regional, and microvascular hemodynamics, multiple-organ functions, mitochondrial energy metabolism, systemic immune-inflammatory response, and oxidative stress. Administration of MSCs in the MSC-CONTROL group did not elicit any measurable acute effects. Treatment of septic animals with MSCs failed to mitigate sepsis-induced hemodynamic alterations or the gradual rise in Sepsis-related organ failure assessment scores. MSCs did not confer any protection against sepsis-mediated cellular myocardial depression and mitochondrial dysfunction. MSCs also failed to modulate the deregulated immune-inflammatory response. Conclusion: Intravenous administration of bone marrow-derived MSCs to healthy animals was well-tolerated. However, in this large-animal, clinically relevant peritonitis-induced sepsis model, MSCs were not capable of reversing any of the sepsis-induced disturbances in multiple biological, organ, and cellular systems.

• Klíčová slova
• acute organ dysfunction, cell therapy, immunomodulation, mesenchymal stem cells, sepsis, septic shock,
• MeSH
• modely nemocí na zvířatech MeSH
• náhodné rozdělení MeSH
• prasata MeSH
• sepse terapie   MeSH
• transplantace mezenchymálních kmenových buněk metody   MeSH
• zvířata MeSH
• Check Tag
• zvířata MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• práce podpořená grantem MeSH