PURPOSE: To comprehensively evaluate the efficacy of different energy sources used for en-bloc transurethral resection of bladder tumors (ERBT) on perioperative outcomes. METHODS: This sub-analysis derived from a prospective randomized study that enrolled patients undergoing ERBT vs conventional transurethral resection of the bladder (cTURB) from January 2019 to January 2022 (NCT03718754). Endpoints were pathological specimen quality and perioperative outcomes after either monopolar (m-ERBT) or bipolar (b-ERBT) or laser (l-ERBT) ERBT. RESULTS: 237 bladder tumors resected in 188 patients included in the analyses: 29 (12.2%) m-ERBT, 136 (57.4%) b-ERBT and 72 (30.4%) l-ERBT. Detrusor muscle (DM) was detected in 191 (80.6%) specimens. Per-tumor analysis revealed comparable rate of DM in the specimens obtained via different energy modalities (p = 0.7). Operative time was longer in the l-ERBT cohort compared to m-ERBT and b-ERBT (p = 0.02) and no obturator nerve reflex (ONR) onset was reported. On logistic regression analysis, b-ERBT was associated with negative lateral resection margins (OR 2.81; 95% CI 1.02-7.70; p = 0.04). There was no significant association of the resection technique with perforation and conversion rates (all p > 0.05). Within a median follow up of 22mo (IQR 11-29), a total of 35 (18.6%) patients had a local recurrence. On Cox regression analysis, patients resected with b-ERBT were less likely to have a recurrence (HR 0.34; 95% CI 0.15-0.78; p = 0.01); When adjusting for established confounders, this association was confirmed (HR 0.24; 95% CI 0.10-0.60; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Different energy sources might achieve comparable perioperative outcomes. Further perspectives involve the assessment of long-term differential oncological outcomes associated with various energy modalities.

• Keywords
• Bladder cancer, Diagnosis, En bloc, Energy source, Resection, Treatment,
• MeSH
• Cystectomy * methods   MeSH
• Laser Therapy * methods   MeSH
• Lasers, Solid-State * therapeutic use   MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Urinary Bladder Neoplasms * surgery   pathology   MeSH
• Prospective Studies MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Treatment Outcome MeSH
• Check Tag
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
• Comparative Study MeSH

PURPOSE: A re-transurethral resection of the bladder (re-TURB) is a well-established approach in managing non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) for various reasons: repeat-TURB is recommended for a macroscopically incomplete initial resection, restaging-TURB is required if the first resection was macroscopically complete but contained no detrusor muscle (DM) and second-TURB is advised for all completely resected T1-tumors with DM in the resection specimen. This study assessed the long-term outcomes after repeat-, second-, and restaging-TURB in T1-NMIBC patients. METHODS: Individual patient data with tumor characteristics of 1660 primary T1-patients (muscle-invasion at re-TURB omitted) diagnosed from 1990 to 2018 in 17 hospitals were analyzed. Time to recurrence, progression, death due to bladder cancer (BC), and all causes (OS) were visualized with cumulative incidence functions and analyzed by log-rank tests and multivariable Cox-regression models stratified by institution. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 45.3 (IQR 22.7-81.1) months. There were no differences in time to recurrence, progression, or OS between patients undergoing restaging (135 patients), second (644 patients), or repeat-TURB (84 patients), nor between patients who did or who did not undergo second or restaging-TURB. However, patients who underwent repeat-TURB had a shorter time to BC death compared to those who had second- or restaging-TURB (multivariable HR 3.58, P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Prognosis did not significantly differ between patients who underwent restaging- or second-TURB. However, a worse prognosis in terms of death due to bladder cancer was found in patients who underwent repeat-TURB compared to second-TURB and restaging-TURB, highlighting the importance of separately evaluating different indications for re-TURB.

• Keywords
• Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer, Prognosis, Re-TURB, Repeat TURB, Restaging TURB, Second TURB,
• MeSH
• Cystectomy MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Urinary Bladder surgery   pathology   MeSH
• Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Neoplasms * MeSH
• Urinary Bladder Neoplasms * surgery   pathology   MeSH
• Prognosis MeSH
• Neoplasm Staging MeSH
• Urologic Surgical Procedures MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH

OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical significance of repeat transurethral resection (reTUR) and surgical margin status after en bloc resection of bladder tumour (ERBT) for pathological T1 (pT1) bladder cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the record of 106 patients with pT1 high-grade bladder cancer who underwent ERBT between April 2013 and February 2021 at multiple institutions. All specimens were reviewed by a genitourinary pathologist. The primary outcome measures were recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between patients with and those without reTUR. We also analysed the predictive value of surgical margin on the likelihood of residual tumour on reTUR. RESULTS: A reTUR was performed in 50 of the 106 patients. The 2-year RFS and 3-year PFS were comparable between patients who underwent reTUR and those who did not (55.1% vs 59.9%, P = 0.6, 80.6% vs 82.6%, P = 0.6, respectively). No patient was upstaged to pT2 on reTUR. Regarding the surgical margin status, there were no recurrences at the original site in 51 patients with negative horizontal margins. Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed that a positive vertical margin was an independent prognostic factor of worse PFS. On reTUR, six pTa/is residues were detected in patients with a positive horizontal margin, and three pT1 residues were detected in one patient with a positive vertical margin or other adverse pathological features. CONCLUSIONS: A reTUR after ERBT for pT1 bladder cancer appears not to improve either recurrence or progression. Surgical margin status affects prognosis and reTUR outcomes. A reTUR can be omitted after ERBT in patients with pT1 bladder cancer and negative margins; for those with positive horizontal or vertical margins, reTUR should remain the standard until proven otherwise.

• Keywords
• Bladder cancer, en bloc TUR, pT1, progression, recurrence, repeat TURs,
• MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Neoplasm Recurrence, Local pathology   MeSH
• Urinary Bladder pathology   MeSH
• Urinary Bladder Neoplasms * surgery   pathology   MeSH
• Margins of Excision * MeSH
• Retrospective Studies MeSH
• Urologic Surgical Procedures MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH

PURPOSE: The goals of transurethral resection of a bladder tumor (TUR) are to completely resect the lesions and to make a correct diagnosis to adequately stage and treat the patient. Persistent disease after TUR is not uncommon and is why re-TUR is recommended in T1G3 patients. When there is T1 tumor in the re-TUR specimen, very high risks of progression (82%) have been reported. We analyze the risks of recurrence, progression to muscle-invasive disease and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) according to tumor stage at re-TUR in T1G3 patients treated with BCG. METHODS: In our retrospective cohort of 2451 T1G3 patients, 934 patients (38.1%) underwent re-TUR. 667 patients had residual disease (71.4%): Ta in 378 (40.5%), T1 in 289 (30.9%) patients. Times to recurrence, progression and CSM in the three groups were estimated using cumulative incidence functions and compared using the Cox regression model. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 5.2 years, 512 patients recurred. The recurrence rate was significantly higher in patients with a T1 at re-TUR (P < 0.001). Progression rates differed according to the pathology at re-TUR, 25.3% in T1, 14.6% in Ta and 14.2% in case of no residual tumor (P < 0.001). Similar trends were seen in both patients with and without muscle in the original TUR specimen. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with T1G3 tumors and no residual disease or Ta at re-TUR have better recurrence, progression and CSM rates than previously reported, with a CSM rate of 13.1 and a 25.3% progression rate in re-TUR T1 disease.

• Keywords
• Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer, Progression, Re-transurethral resection of the bladder, Recurrence,
• MeSH
• Adjuvants, Immunologic therapeutic use   MeSH
• Administration, Intravesical MeSH
• BCG Vaccine therapeutic use   MeSH
• Cystectomy methods   MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Neoplasm Recurrence, Local mortality   MeSH
• Urinary Bladder Neoplasms * mortality   pathology   therapy   MeSH
• Follow-Up Studies MeSH
• Cause of Death MeSH
• Disease Progression MeSH
• Proportional Hazards Models MeSH
• Reoperation MeSH
• Retrospective Studies MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Neoplasm Staging MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Names of Substances
• Adjuvants, Immunologic MeSH
• BCG Vaccine MeSH