Recurrence, progression and cancer-specific mortality according to stage at re-TUR in T1G3 bladder cancer patients treated with BCG: not as bad as previously thought

. 2018 Oct ; 36 (10) : 1621-1627. [epub] 20180502

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid29721611

Grantová podpora
P30 CA008748 NCI NIH HHS - United States

Odkazy

PubMed 29721611
PubMed Central PMC8177015
DOI 10.1007/s00345-018-2299-2
PII: 10.1007/s00345-018-2299-2
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

PURPOSE: The goals of transurethral resection of a bladder tumor (TUR) are to completely resect the lesions and to make a correct diagnosis to adequately stage and treat the patient. Persistent disease after TUR is not uncommon and is why re-TUR is recommended in T1G3 patients. When there is T1 tumor in the re-TUR specimen, very high risks of progression (82%) have been reported. We analyze the risks of recurrence, progression to muscle-invasive disease and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) according to tumor stage at re-TUR in T1G3 patients treated with BCG. METHODS: In our retrospective cohort of 2451 T1G3 patients, 934 patients (38.1%) underwent re-TUR. 667 patients had residual disease (71.4%): Ta in 378 (40.5%), T1 in 289 (30.9%) patients. Times to recurrence, progression and CSM in the three groups were estimated using cumulative incidence functions and compared using the Cox regression model. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 5.2 years, 512 patients recurred. The recurrence rate was significantly higher in patients with a T1 at re-TUR (P < 0.001). Progression rates differed according to the pathology at re-TUR, 25.3% in T1, 14.6% in Ta and 14.2% in case of no residual tumor (P < 0.001). Similar trends were seen in both patients with and without muscle in the original TUR specimen. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with T1G3 tumors and no residual disease or Ta at re-TUR have better recurrence, progression and CSM rates than previously reported, with a CSM rate of 13.1 and a 25.3% progression rate in re-TUR T1 disease.

Department of Biostatistics EORTC Headquarters Brussels Belgium

Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine University of Florence Florence Italy

Department of Surgical Oncological and Stomatological Sciences University of Palermo Palermo Italy

Department of Surgical Science John Radcliffe Hospital University of Oxford Oxford UK

Department of Urology Academic Hospital Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden

Department of Urology Centre Hospitalier Universitaire La Milétrie University of Poitiers Poitiers France

Department of Urology Cochin Hospital Paris France

Department of Urology Fundacio Puigvert University of Barcelona Barcelona Spain

Department of Urology Mayo Clinic Rochester MN USA

Department of Urology Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York NY USA

Department of Urology Motol Hospital University of Praha Prague Czech Republic

Department of Urology Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital Amsterdam The Netherlands

Department of Urology Rabin Medical Centre Tel Aviv Israel

Department of Urology Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre Nijmegen The Netherlands

Department of Urology Santa Chiara Hospital Trento Italy

Department of Urology Sismanoglio Hospital University of Athens Athens Greece

Department of Urology Weill Medical College of Cornell University New York NY USA

Dept of Urology Ospedale Città della Salute e della Scienza Molinette Corso Bramante 88 10126 Turin Italy

Dipartimento di Urologia Università Vita Salute Ospedale S Raffaele Milan Italy

Facharzt fur Urologie Abteilung fur Urologie Chirurgische Universitats klinik Freiburg Germany

Genetic and Molecular Epidemiology Group Spanish National Cancer Research Centre Madrid Spain

Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria

Oncologic and Reconstructive Urology Department of Urology University Hospitals Leuven Louvain Belgium

Policlinico Tor Vergata University of Rome Rome Italy

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Svatek RS, Hollenbeck BK, Holmäng S, et al. The economics of bladder cancer: costs and considerations of caring for this disease. Eur Urol. 2014;66(2):253–262. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2014.01.006. PubMed DOI

Burger M, Catto JWF, Dalbagni G, et al. Epidemiology and risk factors of urothelial bladder cancer. Eur Urol. 2013;63(2):234–241. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.07.033. PubMed DOI

Babjuk M, Böhle A, Burger M, et al. EAU Guidelines on Non–Muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: Update 2016. Eur Urol. 2017;71(3):447–461. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.041. PubMed DOI

Sylvester RJ, Van Der Meijden APM, Oosterlinck W, et al. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: A combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol. 2006;49(3):466–475. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2005.12.031. PubMed DOI

Fernandez-Gomez J, Madero R, Solsona E, et al. Predicting Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Recurrence and Progression in Patients Treated With Bacillus Calmette-Guerin: The CUETO Scoring Model. J Urol 2009;182(5):2195–203 doi:10.1016/j.juro.2009.07.016. PubMed DOI

Xylinas E, Kent M, Kluth L, et al. Accuracy of the EORTC risk tables and of the CUETO scoring model to predict outcomes in non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Br J Cancer 2013;109(6):1460–6.doi:10.1038/bjc.2013.372. PubMed DOI PMC

Ramirez-Backhaus M, Dominguez-Escrig J, Collado A, Rubio-Briones J, Solsona E. Restaging transurethral resection of bladder tumor for high-risk stage Ta and T1 bladder cancer. Curr Urol Rep. 2012;13(2):109–114. doi:10.1007/s11934-012-0234-4. PubMed DOI

Bishr M, Lattouf JB, Latour M, Saad F. Tumour stage on re-staging transurethral resection predicts recurrence and progression-free survival of patients with high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. J Can Urol Assoc. 2014;8(5–6):6–10. doi:10.5489/cuaj.1514. PubMed DOI PMC

Herr HW, Donat SM. A re-staging transurethral resection predicts early progression of superficial bladder cancer. BJU Int. 2006;97(6):1194–1198. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06145.x. PubMed DOI

Herr HW, Donat SM, Dalbagni G. Can Restaging Transurethral Resection of T1 Bladder Cancer Select Patients for Immediate Cystectomy? J Urol 2007;177(1):75–9; doi:10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.070. PubMed DOI

Hautmann RE, Volkmer BG, Gust K. QuantiWcation of the survival beneWt of early versus deferred cystectomy in high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (T1 G3). World J Urol. 2009;27:347–351. doi:10.1007/s00345-009-0402-4. PubMed DOI

Roghmann F, Trinh Q-D, Braun K, et al. Standardized assessment of complications in a contemporary series of European patients undergoing radical cystectomy. Int J Urol. 2014;21(2):143–149. doi:10.1111/iju.12232. PubMed DOI

Nayak JG, Gore JL, Holt SK, Wright JL, Mossanen M, Dash A. Patient-centered risk stratification of disposition outcomes following radical cystectomy. Urol Oncol Semin Orig Investig. 2016;34(5):235.e17–235.e23. doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.11.012. PubMed DOI

Gontero P, Sylvester R, Pisano F, et al. The impact of re-transurethral resection on clinical outcomes in a large multicentre cohort of patients with T1 high-grade/Grade 3 bladder cancer treated with bacille Calmette-Guérin. BJU Int 2016;118(1):44–52 PubMed PMC

Dalbagni G, Vora K, Kaag M, et al. Platinum Priority – Bladder Cancer Clinical Outcome in a Contemporary Series of Restaged Patients with Clinical T1 Bladder Cancer. Eur Urol 2009;56(6):903–10. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2009.07.005. PubMed DOI PMC

Herr HW. Role of re-resection in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. ScientificWorldJournal. 2011;11:283–288. doi:10.1100/tsw.2011.29. PubMed DOI PMC

Gordon P, Thomas PC, Noon AP et al. Long-term outcomes from re-resection for high risk non muscle invasive bladder cancer: a potential to rationalize use. Eur Urol Focus 2017, pii: S2405–4569(17)30241–9. PubMed

Gontero P, Sylvester R, Pisano F, et al. Platinum Priority – Urothelial Cancer Prognostic Factors and Risk Groups in T1G3 Non–Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Patients Initially Treated with Bacillus Calmette-Gué rin: Results of a Retrospective Multicenter Study of 2451 Patients. Eur Urol. 2015;7(7):4–8. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.040. PubMed DOI

Denzinger S, Fritsche H-M, Otto W, Blana A, Wieland W- F, Burger M. Early Versus Deferred Cystectomy for Initial High-Risk pT1G3 Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: Do Risk Factors Define Feasibility of Bladder-Sparing Approach? Eur Urol. 2008;53(1):146–152. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2007.06.030. PubMed DOI

Hautmann RE, Volkmer BG, Gust K. Quantification of the survival benefit of early versus deferred cystectomy in high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (T1 G3). World J Urol. 2009;27(3):347–351. doi:10.1007/s00345-009-0402-4. PubMed DOI

Novotny V, Zastrow S, Koch R, Wirth MP. Radical cystectomy in patients over 70 years of age: impact of comorbidity on perioperative morbidity and mortality. WJUrol 2012;30(6):769–76.doi:10.1007/s00345-011-0782-0. PubMed DOI

Cumberbatch MGK, Foerster Catto JWF. Repeat Transurethral Resection in Non–muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol 2018, article in press. PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...