INTRODUCTION & OBJECTIVES: It is currently recommended to perform open radical nephroureterectomy (oRNU) with bladder cuff excision in patients with locally advanced (cT3-4 or cN1-2) upper tract urothelial carcinoma (laUTUC). We tested the hypothesis that bladder recurrence-free survival (BRFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) are not influenced by the surgical approach in patients with laUTUC using a large multicenter series. MATERIAL & METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study including 361 patients with preoperative cT3-4 cM0 or cN1-2 cM0 laUTUC treated with open or minimally invasive RNU from 1999 to 2019 at 21 academic centers in Europe, Asia, and the United States. Missing values of relevant baseline characteristics were estimated through multiple imputation of chained equations. Baseline patients' heterogeneity was balanced using a 1:1 propensity score matching estimated using logistic regression. Uni- and multivariable Cox regression analyses for bladder recurrence, metastasis, cancer-specific death and overall death were performed according to clinical and pathological characteristics. Kaplan Meier (KM) estimates and log-rank test were used to compare BRFS, MFS, CSS and OS according to clinical and pathological features. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 28 months. After propensity score matching, two cohorts of 115 laUTUC patients each with similar baseline and preoperative tumor characteristics were obtained. In the matched cohort, pT ≥ 3 stage was found in 84 (73%) and 67 (58.3%) patients in the oRNU and miRNU groups, respectively. Positive lymph nodes were detected in 27 (23.5%) and 32 (27.8%) patients in the oRNU and miRNU groups, respectively. In the multivariable regression analysis, pT ≥ 3 and positive lymph nodes were associated with an increased risk of metastasis (HR 3.22, 95% CI 1.26-8.23, and HR 4.03, 95% CI 2.05-7.89, respectively). The surgical approach (oRNU vs. mi RNU) did not influence oncological outcomes as shown by uni- and multivariable analyses as well as Kaplan-Meier estimates, regardless of pT stage. CONCLUSIONS: The oncological outcomes of laUTUC for cT3-4 cM0 or cN1-2 cM0 disease are comparable whether RNU is performed via an open or minimally invasive approach. Therefore, the decision to opt for oRNU or miRNU should be guided by the surgeon's expertise and the patient's comorbidities, rather than concerns over long-term oncological outcomes associated with either surgical technique.

• Keywords
• Locally advanced Utuc, Minimally-invasive nephroureterectomy, Open nephroureterectomy, Upper tract urothelial cancer, Utuc,
• MeSH
• Carcinoma, Transitional Cell * surgery   pathology   mortality   MeSH
• Cohort Studies MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures methods   MeSH
• Survival Rate MeSH
• Kidney Neoplasms * surgery   pathology   mortality   MeSH
• Ureteral Neoplasms * surgery   pathology   mortality   MeSH
• Nephroureterectomy * methods   MeSH
• Retrospective Studies MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Neoplasm Staging MeSH
• Treatment Outcome MeSH
• Check Tag
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Multicenter Study MeSH
• Comparative Study MeSH

INTRODUCTION: Platinum-based chemotherapy followed by the immune checkpoint inhibitor avelumab represents an intensified upfront therapy regimen that may result in significant downstaging and, subsequently, potentially radical robotic nephroureterectomy with a lymph node dissection, an uncommon approach with an unexpectedly favorable outcome. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a case of a 70-year-old female presented with a sizeable cN2+ tumor of the left renal pelvis and achieved deep partial radiologic response after systemic therapy with four cycles of gemcitabine-cisplatin chemotherapy followed by avelumab maintenance therapy and subsequent robotic resection of the tumor. The patient continued with adjuvant nivolumab therapy once recovered after surgery and remained tumor-free on the subsequent follow-up. The systemic treatment was without any severe adverse reaction. CONCLUSION: We highlight the feasibility of the upfront systemic therapy with four cycles of gemcitabine-cisplatin chemotherapy followed by avelumab maintenance, robotic-assisted removal of the tumor, and adjuvant immunotherapy with nivolumab. This intensification of the upfront systemic therapy, and the actual treatment sequence significantly increase the chances of prolonged survival or even a cure. This type of personalized therapeutic approach can accelerate future advanced immunotherapeutic strategies.

• Keywords
• UTUC, cancer-specific survival, immune checkpoint inhibitors, immunotherapy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radical nephroureterectomy, upper urinary tract carcinoma,
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Case Reports MeSH

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Although lymph node dissection (LND) during radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is recommended for high-risk nonmetastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), adherence to guidelines remains insufficient in clinical practice. Therefore, this review aims to comprehensively summarize the current evidence regarding the diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic impact of LND during RNU in UTUC patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Clinical nodal staging using conventional CT scan has low sensitivity (25%) and diagnostic accuracy [area under the curve (AUC): 0.58] in UTUC, suggesting the importance of LND for obtaining accurate N-staging. Patients with pathological node-positive (pN+) disease have poor disease-free survival (DFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) compared with those with pN0. In addition, population-based studies showed that patients who underwent LND improved CSS and OS than those who did not, even in patients who received adjuvant systemic therapy. The number of lymph nodes removed has also been shown to be associated with improved CSS and OS, even in pT0 patients. Template-based LND should be performed as the extent of lymph node is more important than the number of lymph nodes. Robot-assisted RNU may facilitate performing a meticulous LND compared with a laparoscopic approach. Postoperative complications such as lymphatic and/or chylous leakage are increased but adequately manageable. However, the current evidence is not supported by high-quality studies. SUMMARY: Based on the published data, LND during RNU is a standard procedure for high-risk nonmetastatic UTUC, owing to its diagnostic, staging, prognostic, and, potentially, therapeutic benefits. Template-based LND should be offered to all patients who are planned for RNU for high-risk nonmetastatic UTUC. Patients with pN+ disease are optimal candidates for adjuvant systemic therapy. Robot-assisted RNU may facilitate meticulous LND compared with laparoscopic RNU.

• MeSH
• Carcinoma, Transitional Cell * pathology   MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Lymph Node Excision adverse effects   methods   MeSH
• Lymph Nodes diagnostic imaging   surgery   pathology   MeSH
• Urinary Bladder Neoplasms * pathology   MeSH
• Ureteral Neoplasms * surgery   MeSH
• Nephroureterectomy methods   MeSH
• Retrospective Studies MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Review MeSH

OBJECTIVES: To identify correlates of survival and perioperative outcomes of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients undergoing open (ORNU), laparoscopic (LRNU), and robotic (RRNU) radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, multicenter study that included non-metastatic UTUC patients who underwent RNU between 1990-2020. Multiple imputation by chained equations was used to impute missing data. Patients were divided into three groups based on their surgical treatment and were adjusted by 1:1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). Survival outcomes per group were estimated for recurrence-free survival (RFS), bladder recurrence-free survival (BRFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Perioperative outcomes: Intraoperative blood loss, hospital length of stay (LOS), and overall (OPC) and major postoperative complications (MPCs; defined as Clavien-Dindo > 3) were assessed between groups. RESULTS: Of the 2434 patients included, 756 remained after PSM with 252 in each group. The three groups had similar baseline clinicopathological characteristics. The median follow-up was 32 months. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests demonstrated similar RFS, CSS, and OS between groups. BRFS was found to be superior with ORNU. Using multivariable regression analyses, LRNU and RRNU were independently associated with worse BRFS (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.22-2.28, p = 0.001 and HR 1.73, 95%CI 1.22-2.47, p = 0.002, respectively). LRNU and RRNU were associated with a significantly shorter LOS (beta -1.1, 95% CI -2.2-0.02, p = 0.047 and beta -6.1, 95% CI -7.2-5.0, p < 0.001, respectively) and fewer MPCs (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.31-0.79, p = 0.003 and OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.16-0.46, p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this large international cohort, we demonstrated similar RFS, CSS, and OS among ORNU, LRNU, and RRNU. However, LRNU and RRNU were associated with significantly worse BRFS, but a shorter LOS and fewer MPCs.

• Keywords
• RNU, UTUC, surgical approach, transitional cell carcinoma, treatment outcomes,
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH

Background: Measuring quality of care indicators is important for clinicians and decision making in health care to improve patient outcomes. Objective: The primary objective was to identify quality of care indicators for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and to validate these in an international cohort treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). The secondary objective was to assess the factors associated with failure to validate the pentafecta. Design: We performed a retrospective multicenter study of patients treated with RNU for EAU high-risk (HR) UTUC. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Five quality indicators were consensually approved, including a negative surgical margin, a complete bladder-cuff resection, the absence of hematological complications, the absence of major complications, and the absence of a 12-month postoperative recurrence. After multiple imputations and propensity-score matching, log-rank tests and a Cox regression were used to assess the survival outcomes. Logistic regression analyses assessed predictors for pentafecta failure. Results: Among the 1718 included patients, 844 (49%) achieved the pentafecta. The median follow-up was 31 months. Patients who achieved the pentafecta had superior 5-year overall- (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) compared to those who did not (68.7 vs. 50.1% and 79.8 vs. 62.7%, respectively, all p < 0.001). On multivariable analyses, achieving the pentafecta was associated with improved recurrence-free survival (RFS), CSS, and OS. No preoperative clinical factors predicted a failure to validate the pentafecta. Conclusions: Establishing quality indicators for UTUC may help define prognosis and improve patient care. We propose a pentafecta quality criteria in RNU patients. Approximately half of the patients evaluated herein reached this endpoint, which in turn was independently associated with survival outcomes. Extended validation is needed.

• Keywords
• UTUC, nephroureterectomy, pentafecta, quality, upper tract urothelial carcinoma,
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH

OBJECTIVES: To compare oncological outcomes of open (ORNU) and laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (LRNU) after controlling for preoperative patient-derived factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated a multi-institutional collaborative database composed of 3984 patients diagnosed with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with RNU between 2006 and 2018. To adjust for potential selection bias, propensity score matching adjusted for age, gender and American society Anesthesiology (ASA) score was performed with one ORNU patient matched to one LRNU patient. Uni- and multivariable Cox regression evaluating the risk of overall recurrence, cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and overall mortality (OM) in the overall population and after propensity matching were performed. RESULTS: In total, 3984 patients underwent RNU, of these 3227 (81%) patients were treated with ORNU and 757 (19%) patients with LRNU. Within a median follow-up of 62 months, 1276 recurrences, 844 CSMs and 1128 OMs were recorded. On multivariable analyses, the LRNU approach was associated with an increased risk of overall recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 1.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.54; P = 0.02), but on the other hand LRNU was associated with a protective effect on CSM (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.56-0.98; P = 0.04). After propensity matching analyses adjusted for age, gender and ASA score, 757 patients treated with LRNU and 757 patients treated with ORNU were available for the analyses. On multivariable Cox regression, LRNU vs ORNU was not associated with any difference in overall recurrence (P = 0.08), CSM (P = 0.1) or OM (P = 0.9). CONCLUSION: Our present data suggest that even if the type of approach to RNU was associated with different survival outcomes considering the overall population, this difference vanished when adjusted for potential confounders in propensity matching analyses. Therefore, we found that LRNU is not inferior to the ORNU approach for the treatment of UTUC. ABBREVIATIONS: ASA: American Society of Anesthesiology; CIS: carcinoma in situ; CSM: cancer-specific mortality; HR: hazard ratio; IQR: interquartile range; LN: lymph node; LNI: lymph node invasion; LVI: lymphovascular invasion; OM: overall mortality; pT: pathological tumour stage; RCT: randomised controlled trial; (L)(O)RNU: (laparoscopic) (open) radical nephroureterectomy; UTUC: upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

• Keywords
• RNU, UTUC, Upper tract urothelial carcinoma, laparoscopic, open, radical nephroureterectomy,
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH

BACKGROUND: Available guidelines on the management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) are restricted due to the lack of strong evidence-based recommendations. Adequate, well-powered randomized trials are missing due to the rarity of the disease. To overcome this problem, we need alternative study designs to provide generalizable data. OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this registry is to provide a real-world overview on patterns of presentation and management of UTUC. Secondary objectives include comparison of outcomes of different treatments and tumor stages and evaluation of compliance with the current European Association of Urology recommendations for UTUC. METHODS: For this observational, international, multicenter, cohort study, clinical data of consecutive patients suspected of having UTUC, irrespective of type of management, will be prospectively collected up to 5 years after inclusion. Data on the patterns of presentation, diagnostics, and treatment as well as short-, mid-, and long-term oncological and functional outcomes will be analyzed. Possible associations between variables, basal characteristics, and outcomes will be tested by multivariable analyses. The methodology will address potential sources of bias and confounders. RESULTS: The registry was initiated in November 2014 after obtaining institutional review board approval. Data collection started in December 2014. At the time of submission of this manuscript, 2451 patients from 125 centers from 37 countries were included. Inclusion of patients will be closed 5 years after initiation of the registry. Quality checks will be performed centrally with continuous communication and feedback with the centers to ensure accuracy. The first results are expected in the first trimester of 2020. CONCLUSIONS: This large observational prospective cohort will generate landmark "real-world" data and hypotheses for further studies. We expect these data to optimize the management of UTUC, provide insights on harms and benefits of treatment, and serve as quality control. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02281188; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02281188. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/15363.

• Keywords
• incidence, management, outcomes, registry, upper urinary tract, urothelial cancer,
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH