PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Although lymph node dissection (LND) during radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is recommended for high-risk nonmetastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), adherence to guidelines remains insufficient in clinical practice. Therefore, this review aims to comprehensively summarize the current evidence regarding the diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic impact of LND during RNU in UTUC patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Clinical nodal staging using conventional CT scan has low sensitivity (25%) and diagnostic accuracy [area under the curve (AUC): 0.58] in UTUC, suggesting the importance of LND for obtaining accurate N-staging. Patients with pathological node-positive (pN+) disease have poor disease-free survival (DFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) compared with those with pN0. In addition, population-based studies showed that patients who underwent LND improved CSS and OS than those who did not, even in patients who received adjuvant systemic therapy. The number of lymph nodes removed has also been shown to be associated with improved CSS and OS, even in pT0 patients. Template-based LND should be performed as the extent of lymph node is more important than the number of lymph nodes. Robot-assisted RNU may facilitate performing a meticulous LND compared with a laparoscopic approach. Postoperative complications such as lymphatic and/or chylous leakage are increased but adequately manageable. However, the current evidence is not supported by high-quality studies. SUMMARY: Based on the published data, LND during RNU is a standard procedure for high-risk nonmetastatic UTUC, owing to its diagnostic, staging, prognostic, and, potentially, therapeutic benefits. Template-based LND should be offered to all patients who are planned for RNU for high-risk nonmetastatic UTUC. Patients with pN+ disease are optimal candidates for adjuvant systemic therapy. Robot-assisted RNU may facilitate meticulous LND compared with laparoscopic RNU.

• MeSH
• Carcinoma, Transitional Cell * pathology   MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Lymph Node Excision adverse effects   methods   MeSH
• Lymph Nodes diagnostic imaging   surgery   pathology   MeSH
• Urinary Bladder Neoplasms * pathology   MeSH
• Ureteral Neoplasms * surgery   MeSH
• Nephroureterectomy methods   MeSH
• Retrospective Studies MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Review MeSH

BACKGROUND: We aimed to assess the clinical, oncological, and pathological impact of en bloc resection of bladder tumors (ERBT) compared with conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumors (cTURBT) for pT1 high-grade (HG) bladder cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the record of 326 patients (cTURBT: n = 216, ERBT: n = 110) diagnosed with pT1 HG bladder cancer at multiple institutions. The cohorts were matched by one-to-one propensity scores based on patient and tumor demographics. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and perioperative and pathologic outcomes were compared. The prognosticators of RFS and PFS were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: After matching, 202 patients (cTURBT: n = 101, ERBT: n = 101) were retained. There were no differences in perioperative outcomes between the two procedures. The 3-year RFS, PFS, and CSS were not different between the two procedures (p = 0.7, 1, and 0.7, respectively). Among patients who underwent repeat transurethral resection (reTUR), the rate of any residue on reTUR was significantly lower in the ERBT group (cTURBT: 36% versus ERBT: 15%, p = 0.029). Adequate sampling of muscularis propria (83% versus 93%, p = 0.029) and diagnostic rates of pT1a/b substaging (90% versus 100%, p < 0.001) were significantly better in ERBT specimen compared with cTURBT specimen. On multivariable analyses, pT1a/b substaging was a prognosticator of disease progression. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with pT1HG bladder cancer, ERBT had similar perioperative and mid-term oncologic outcomes compared with cTURBT. However, ERBT improves the quality of resection and specimen, yielding less residue on reTUR and yielding superior histopathologic information such as substaging.

• MeSH
• Cystectomy MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Urinary Bladder Neoplasms * surgery   pathology   MeSH
• Retrospective Studies MeSH
• Propensity Score MeSH
• Urologic Surgical Procedures methods   MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH

PURPOSE: To assess the prognostic value of sex for non-muscle-invasive/muscle-invasive bladder urothelial carcinoma (NMIBC/MIBC) treated with radical surgery. METHODS: The PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched in November 2021 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis statement. Studies were deemed eligible if they involved the comparison of the overall, cancer-specific, progression, and recurrence-free survival of patients with NMIBC/MIBC. Formal sex-stratified meta-analyses of these outcomes were performed. RESULTS: Thirty-one studies, which included 32,525 patients with NMIBC, and 63 studies, which included 85,132 patients with MIBC, were eligible for review and meta-analysis. Female sex was associated with worse cancer-specific survival (pooled hazard ratio [HR], 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-1.31) and overall survival (pooled HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00-1.05) in patients with MIBC. In contrast, however, sex was not associated with cancer-specific survival (pooled HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.70-1.46), progression-free survival (pooled HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.88-1.24), and recurrence-free survival (pooled HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.98-1.16) in patients with NMIBC. CONCLUSIONS: Sex is associated with an increased risk of worse survival outcomes in patients with MIBC but not in those with NMIBC. Given the genetic and social differences between sexes, sex may represent a key factor in the clinical decision-making process.

• Keywords
• Meta-analysis, Muscle-invasive bladder urothelial carcinoma, Non-muscle-invasive bladder urothelial carcinoma, Sex,
• MeSH
• Carcinoma, Transitional Cell * pathology   MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Urinary Bladder pathology   MeSH
• Urinary Bladder Neoplasms * pathology   MeSH
• Prognosis MeSH
• Proportional Hazards Models MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Meta-Analysis MeSH
• Systematic Review MeSH

OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical significance of repeat transurethral resection (reTUR) and surgical margin status after en bloc resection of bladder tumour (ERBT) for pathological T1 (pT1) bladder cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the record of 106 patients with pT1 high-grade bladder cancer who underwent ERBT between April 2013 and February 2021 at multiple institutions. All specimens were reviewed by a genitourinary pathologist. The primary outcome measures were recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between patients with and those without reTUR. We also analysed the predictive value of surgical margin on the likelihood of residual tumour on reTUR. RESULTS: A reTUR was performed in 50 of the 106 patients. The 2-year RFS and 3-year PFS were comparable between patients who underwent reTUR and those who did not (55.1% vs 59.9%, P = 0.6, 80.6% vs 82.6%, P = 0.6, respectively). No patient was upstaged to pT2 on reTUR. Regarding the surgical margin status, there were no recurrences at the original site in 51 patients with negative horizontal margins. Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed that a positive vertical margin was an independent prognostic factor of worse PFS. On reTUR, six pTa/is residues were detected in patients with a positive horizontal margin, and three pT1 residues were detected in one patient with a positive vertical margin or other adverse pathological features. CONCLUSIONS: A reTUR after ERBT for pT1 bladder cancer appears not to improve either recurrence or progression. Surgical margin status affects prognosis and reTUR outcomes. A reTUR can be omitted after ERBT in patients with pT1 bladder cancer and negative margins; for those with positive horizontal or vertical margins, reTUR should remain the standard until proven otherwise.

• Keywords
• Bladder cancer, en bloc TUR, pT1, progression, recurrence, repeat TURs,
• MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Neoplasm Recurrence, Local pathology   MeSH
• Urinary Bladder pathology   MeSH
• Urinary Bladder Neoplasms * surgery   pathology   MeSH
• Margins of Excision * MeSH
• Retrospective Studies MeSH
• Urologic Surgical Procedures MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH

PURPOSE: We assessed the prognostic value of systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) to refine risk stratification of the heterogeneous spectrum of patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) METHODS: In this multi-institutional cohort, preoperative blood-based SII was retrospectively assessed in 1117 patients with NMIBC who underwent transurethral resection of bladder (TURB) between 1996 and 2007. The optimal cut-off value of SII was determined as 580 using the best Youden index. Cox regression analyses were performed. The concordance index (C-index) and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to assess the discrimination of the predictive models. RESULTS: Overall, 309 (28%) patients had high SII. On multivariable analyses, high SII was significantly associated with worse PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.84; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23-2.77; P = 0.003) and CSS (HR 2.53; 95% CI 1.42-4.48; P = 0.001). Subgroup analyses, according to the European Association of Urology guidelines, demonstrated the main prognostic impact of high SII, with regards to PFS (HR 3.39; 95%CI 1.57-7.31; P = 0.002) and CSS (HR 4.93; 95% CI 1.70-14.3; P = 0.005), in patients with intermediate-risk group; addition of SII to the standard predictive model improved its discrimination ability both on C-index (6% and 12%, respectively) and DCA. In exploratory intergroup analyses of patients with intermediate-risk, the improved discrimination ability was retained the prediction of PFS and CSS. CONCLUSION: Preoperative SII seems to identify NMIBC patients who have a worse disease and prognosis. Such easily available and cheap standard biomarkers may help refine the decision-making process regarding adjuvant treatment in patients with intermediate-risk NMIBC.

• Keywords
• Biomarker, Intermediate-risk, NMIBC, SII, Survival,
• MeSH
• Risk Assessment MeSH
• Neoplasm Invasiveness MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Urinary Bladder Neoplasms complications   immunology   pathology   MeSH
• Prognosis MeSH
• Retrospective Studies MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Inflammation etiology   MeSH
• Check Tag
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Multicenter Study MeSH