BACKGROUND: Fever is associated with brain injury after cardiac arrest. It is unknown whether fever management with a feedback-controlled device impacts patient-centered outcomes in cardiac arrest patients. This trial aims to investigate fever management with or without a temperature control device after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. METHODS: The TEMP-CARE trial is part of the 2 × 2 × 2 factorial Sedation, TEmperature and Pressure after Cardiac Arrest and REsuscitation (STEPCARE) trial, a randomized, international, multicenter, parallel-group, investigator-initiated, superiority trial that will evaluate sedation strategies, temperature management, and blood pressure targets simultaneously in nontraumatic/nonhemorrhagic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients following hospital admission. For the temperature management component of the trial described in this protocol, patients will be randomly allocated to fever management with or without a feedback-controlled temperature control device. For those managed with a device, if temperature ≥37.8°C occurs within 72 h post-randomization the device will be started targeting a temperature of ≤37.5°C. Standard fever treatment, as recommended by local guidelines, including pharmacological agents, will be provided to participants in both groups. The two other components of the STEPCARE trial evaluate sedation and blood pressure strategies. Apart from the STEPCARE trial interventions, all other aspects of general intensive care will be according to the local practices of the participating site. A physician blinded to the intervention will determine the neurological prognosis following European Resuscitation Council and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine guidelines. The primary outcome is all-cause mortality at six months post-randomization. To detect a 5.6% absolute risk reduction (90% power, alpha .05), 3500 participants will be enrolled. Secondary outcomes include poor functional outcome at six months, intensive care-related serious adverse events, and overall health status at six months. CONCLUSION: The TEMP-CARE trial will investigate if post-cardiac arrest management of fever with or without a temperature control device affects patient-important outcomes after cardiac arrest.

• Klíčová slova
• cardiac arrest, feedback‐controlled device, fever, randomized controlled trial, temperature management,
• MeSH
• horečka * terapie   MeSH
• kardiopulmonální resuscitace * MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• multicentrické studie jako téma MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma MeSH
• tělesná teplota MeSH
• terapeutická hypotermie * přístrojové vybavení   MeSH
• zástava srdce mimo nemocnici * terapie   komplikace   MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• protokol klinické studie MeSH

BACKGROUND: Sedation is often provided to resuscitated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients to tolerate post-cardiac arrest care, including temperature management. However, the evidence of benefit or harm from routinely administered deep sedation after cardiac arrest is limited. The aim of this trial is to investigate the effects of continuous deep sedation compared to minimal sedation on patient-important outcomes in resuscitated OHCA patients in a large clinical trial. METHODS: The SED-CARE trial is part of the 2 × 2 × 2 factorial Sedation, Temperature and Pressure after Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (STEPCARE) trial, a randomized international, multicentre, parallel-group, investigator-initiated, superiority trial with three simultaneous intervention arms. In the SED-CARE trial, adults with sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) who are comatose following resuscitation from OHCA will be randomized within 4 hours to continuous deep sedation (Richmond agitation and sedation scale (RASS) -4/-5) (intervention) or minimal sedation (RASS 0 to -2) (comparator), for 36 h after ROSC. The primary outcome will be all-cause mortality at 6 months after randomization. The two other components of the STEPCARE trial evaluate sedation and temperature control strategies. Apart from the STEPCARE trial interventions, all other aspects of general intensive care will be according to the local practices of the participating site. Neurological prognostication will be performed according to European Resuscitation Council and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine guidelines by a physician blinded to the allocation group. To detect an absolute risk reduction of 5.6% with an alpha of 0.05, 90% power, 3500 participants will be enrolled. The secondary outcomes will be the proportion of participants with poor functional outcomes 6 months after randomization, serious adverse events in the intensive care unit, and patient-reported overall health status 6 months after randomization. CONCLUSION: The SED-CARE trial will investigate if continuous deep sedation (RASS -4/-5) for 36 h confers a mortality benefit compared to minimal sedation (RASS 0 to -2) after cardiac arrest.

• Klíčová slova
• cardiac arrest, randomized clinical trial, sedation,
• MeSH
• analgosedace * metody   MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• hluboká sedace * metody   MeSH
• kardiopulmonální resuscitace * metody   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma MeSH
• zástava srdce mimo nemocnici * terapie   mortalita   MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• protokol klinické studie MeSH
• srovnávací studie MeSH

PURPOSE: To compare the performance of targeted temperature management (TTM) at 33 °C using intravascular (IC) vs. surface-cooling (SFC) devices after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). METHODS: A post hoc analysis including OHCA patients randomized to hypothermia in the TTM2-trial (NCT02908308) comparing hypothermia with normothermia. The main outcome was cooling performance, defined as the proportion of patients reaching target temperature < 33.5 °C within 4 h, time outside temperature ranges during maintenance, rewarming rate and post-TTM fever. Exploratory outcomes included survival and good functional outcome, defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores of 0-3 at 6 months, analyzed using Inverse Probability Treatment Weighting (IPTW). RESULTS: Among 930 patients randomized to hypothermia, 876 were treated with a cooling device and included in this study. Of those, 27.3% received IC devices, while 72.7% received SFC devices. The proportion reaching target temperature within 4 h was higher with IC (IC: 69.6% vs. SFC: 49.2%; p < 0.001). Temperature outside ranges during the cooling period and post-TTM fever were lower with IC compared to SFC (17.2% vs. 39.6%; p < 0.001 and 0% vs. 6.3%; p < 0.001, respectively). In the exploratory IPTW analysis, 6-month survival rates were 55.2% in the IC group and 50.2% in the SFC group (OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.89-1.68) and survival with good functional outcome at 6 months was 51.1% patients in the IC group and 44.9% in the SFC (OR 1.28, 95% CI 0.93-1.77). CONCLUSIONS: Among OHCA patients randomized to hypothermia in the TTM2 study, intravascular cooling, compared with surface cooling, was associated with better cooling performance.

• Klíčová slova
• Hypothermia, Intravascular cooling, Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, Surface cooling,
• MeSH
• kardiopulmonální resuscitace metody   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• terapeutická hypotermie * metody   MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• zástava srdce mimo nemocnici * terapie   mortalita   MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
• srovnávací studie MeSH

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess whether hypothermia increased survival and improved functional outcome when compared with normothermia in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients with similar characteristics than in previous randomized studies showing benefits for hypothermia. METHODS: Post hoc analysis of a pragmatic, multicenter, randomized clinical trial (TTM-2, NCT02908308). In this analysis, the subset of patients included in the trial who had similar characteristics to patients included in one previous randomized trial and randomized to hypothermia at 33 °C or normothermia (i.e. target < 37.8 °C) were considered. The primary outcome was survival at 6 months; secondary outcomes included favorable functional outcome at 6 months, defined as a modified Rankin scale of 0-3. Time-to-death and the occurrence of adverse events were also reported. RESULTS: From a total of 1891 included in the TTM-2 study, 600 (31.7%) were included in the analysis, 294 in the hypothermia and 306 in the normothermia group. At 6 months, 207 of the 294 patients (70.4%) in the hypothermia group and 220 of the 306 patients (71.8%) in the normothermia group had survived (relative risk with hypothermia, 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81 to 1.15; P = 0.71). Also, 198 of the 294 (67.3%) in the hypothermia group and 202 of the 306 (66.0%) in the normothermia group had a favorable functional outcome (relative risk with hypothermia, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.23; P = 0.79). There was a significant increase in the occurrence of arrythmias in the hypothermia group (62/294, 21.2%) when compared to the normothermia group (43/306, 14.1%-OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.05-2.14; p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, hypothermia at 33˚C did not improve survival or functional outcome in a subset of patients with similar cardiac arrest characteristics to patients in whom benefit from hypothermia was shown in prior studies.

• Klíčová slova
• Cardiac arrest, Hypothermia, Outcome, Shockable rhythm,
• MeSH
• kardiopulmonální resuscitace metody   statistika a číselné údaje   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• terapeutická hypotermie * metody   statistika a číselné údaje   MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• zástava srdce mimo nemocnici * terapie   mortalita   MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH

BACKGROUND: Induced hypothermia post-cardiac arrest is neuroprotective in animal experiments, but few high-quality studies have been performed in larger animals with human-like brains. The neuroprotective effect of postischemic hypothermia has recently been questioned in human trials. Our aim is to investigate whether hypothermia post-cardiac arrest confers a benefit compared to normothermia in large adult animals. Our hypothesis is that induced hypothermia post cardiac arrest is neuroprotective and that the effect diminishes when delayed two hours. METHODS: Adult female pigs were anesthetized, mechanically ventilated and kept at baseline parameters including normothermia (38 °C). All animals were subjected to ten minutes of cardiac arrest (no-flow) by induced ventricular fibrillation, followed by four minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation with mechanical compressions, prior to the first countershock. Animals with sustained return of spontaneous circulation (systolic blood pressure >60 mmHg for ten minutes) within fifteen minutes from start of life support were included and randomized to three groups; immediate or delayed (2 h) intravenous cooling, both targeting 33 °C, or intravenously controlled normothermia (38 °C). Temperature control was applied for thirty hours including cooling time, temperature at target and controlled rewarming (0.5 °C/h). Animals were extubated and kept alive for seven days. The primary outcome measure is histological brain injury on day seven. Secondary outcomes include neurological and neurocognitive recovery, and the trajectory of biomarkers of brain injury. CONCLUSION: High-quality animal experiments in clinically relevant large animal models are necessary to close the gap of knowledge regarding neuroprotective effects of induced hypothermia after cardiac arrest.Trial registration:Preclinicaltrials.eu (PCTE0000272), published 2021-11-03.

• Klíčová slova
• Cardiac arrest, Functional outcome, Hypothermia, Swine, Temperature control,
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH

IMPORTANCE: International guidelines recommend body temperature control below 37.8 °C in unconscious patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA); however, a target temperature of 33 °C might lead to better outcomes when the initial rhythm is nonshockable. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether hypothermia at 33 °C increases survival and improves function when compared with controlled normothermia in unconscious adults resuscitated from OHCA with initial nonshockable rhythm. DATA SOURCES: Individual patient data meta-analysis of 2 multicenter, randomized clinical trials (Targeted Normothermia after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest [TTM2; NCT02908308] and HYPERION [NCT01994772]) with blinded outcome assessors. Unconscious patients with OHCA and an initial nonshockable rhythm were eligible for the final analysis. STUDY SELECTION: The study cohorts had similar inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients were randomized to hypothermia (target temperature 33 °C) or normothermia (target temperature 36.5 to 37.7 °C), according to different study protocols, for at least 24 hours. Additional analyses of mortality and unfavorable functional outcome were performed according to age, sex, initial rhythm, presence or absence of shock on admission, time to return of spontaneous circulation, lactate levels on admission, and the cardiac arrest hospital prognosis score. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Only patients who experienced OHCA and had a nonshockable rhythm with all causes of cardiac arrest were included. Variables from the 2 studies were available from the original data sets and pooled into a unique database and analyzed. Clinical outcomes were harmonized into a single file, which was checked for accuracy of numbers, distributions, and categories. The last day of follow-up from arrest was recorded for each patient. Adjustment for primary outcome and functional outcome was performed using age, gender, time to return of spontaneous circulation, and bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was mortality at 3 months; secondary outcomes included unfavorable functional outcome at 3 to 6 months, defined as a Cerebral Performance Category score of 3 to 5. RESULTS: A total of 912 patients were included, 490 from the TTM2 trial and 422 from the HYPERION trial. Of those, 442 had been assigned to hypothermia (48.4%; mean age, 65.5 years; 287 males [64.9%]) and 470 to normothermia (51.6%; mean age, 65.6 years; 327 males [69.6%]); 571 patients had a first monitored rhythm of asystole (62.6%) and 503 a presumed noncardiac cause of arrest (55.2%). At 3 months, 354 of 442 patients in the hypothermia group (80.1%) and 386 of 470 patients in the normothermia group (82.1%) had died (relative risk [RR] with hypothermia, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.89-1.20; P = .63). On the last day of follow-up, 386 of 429 in the hypothermia group (90.0%) and 413 of 463 in the normothermia group (89.2%) had an unfavorable functional outcome (RR with hypothermia, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.87-1.15; P = .97). The association of hypothermia with death and functional outcome was consistent across the prespecified subgroups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this individual patient data meta-analysis, including unconscious survivors from OHCA with an initial nonshockable rhythm, hypothermia at 33 °C did not significantly improve survival or functional outcome.

• MeSH
• bezvědomí MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• hypotermie * MeSH
• kardiopulmonální resuscitace * MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• prognóza MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• terapeutická hypotermie * metody   MeSH
• zástava srdce mimo nemocnici * terapie   MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• komentáře MeSH