BACKGROUND: PSMA-targeted radioligand therapies (PSMA RLT) are an effective and safe option for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, but responsive subtypes and their biomarkers are not fully defined. METHODS: Plasma samples for cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis were collected from 17 patients undergoing [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T. CfDNA underwent whole-genome sequencing to establish copy number variation (CNV) profiles and circulating-tumor DNA (ctDNA) levels and compared between prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response- and 1-year overall survival (1YOS) groups. RESULTS: Non-responders exhibited higher degrees of cfDNA CNV burden (P = 0.048) and higher ctDNA levels (P = 0.036) than responders. Both markers allowed for the differentiation of responses (AUC: 0.792, 0.806) and 1YOS (AUC: 0.778, 0.847). CONCLUSION: Unresponsive patients exhibited higher levels of cfDNA genomic instability and ctDNA levels, warranting genome-wide CNV profiling studies next to targeted approaches for mechanistic radiobiological insights and their value as response biomarkers for PSMA RLTs.

• Klíčová slova
• CNV, CtDNA, Liquid biopsy, PSMA RLT, Prostate cancer,
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH

BACKGROUND: To validate the clinical utility of a previously identified circulating tumor DNA methylation marker (meth-ctDNA) panel for disease detection and survival outcomes, meth-ctDNA markers were compared to PSA levels and PSMA PET/CT findings in men with different stages of prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS: 122 PCa patients who underwent [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and plasma sampling (03/2019-08/2021) were analyzed. cfDNA was extracted, and a panel of 8 individual meth-ctDNA markers was queried. PET scans were qualitatively and quantitatively assessed. PSA and meth-ctDNA markers were compared to PET findings, and their relative prognostic value was evaluated. RESULTS: PSA discriminated best between negative and tumor-indicative PET scans in all (AUC 0.77) and hormone-sensitive (hsPC) patients (0.737). In castration-resistant PCa (CRPC), the meth-ctDNA marker KLF8 performed best (AUC 0.824). CHST11 differentiated best between non- and metastatic scans (AUC 0.705) overall, KLF8 best in hsPC and CRPC (AUC 0.662, 0.85). Several meth-ctDNA markers correlated low to moderate with the tumor volume in all (5/8) and CRPC patients (6/8), while PSA levels correlated moderately to strongly with the tumor volume in all groups (all p < 0.001). CRPC overall survival was independently associated with LDAH and PSA (p = 0.0168, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The studied meth-ctDNA markers are promising for the minimally-invasive detection and prognostication of CRPC but do not allow for clinical characterization of hsPC. Prospective studies are warranted for their use in therapy response and outcome prediction in CRPC and potential incremental value for PCa monitoring in PSA-low settings.

• Klíčová slova
• DNA methylation, Epigenetics, PET/CT, PSMA, Prostate cancer, cfDNA,
• MeSH
• cirkulující nádorová DNA * krev   genetika   MeSH
• izotopy gallia MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• metylace DNA * MeSH
• nádorové biomarkery * genetika   krev   MeSH
• nádory prostaty * genetika   diagnostické zobrazování   krev   MeSH
• PET/CT * metody   MeSH
• prognóza MeSH
• prostatický specifický antigen krev   MeSH
• průřezové studie MeSH
• radioizotopy galia MeSH
• senioři nad 80 let MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři nad 80 let MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• srovnávací studie MeSH
• Názvy látek
• cirkulující nádorová DNA * MeSH
• gallium 68 PSMA-11 MeSH Prohlížeč
• izotopy gallia MeSH
• nádorové biomarkery * MeSH
• prostatický specifický antigen MeSH
• PSMA-11 MeSH Prohlížeč
• radioizotopy galia MeSH