BACKGROUND: We designed the EURAMOS-1 trial to investigate whether intensified postoperative chemotherapy for patients whose tumour showed a poor response to preoperative chemotherapy (≥10% viable tumour) improved event-free survival in patients with high-grade osteosarcoma. METHODS: EURAMOS-1 was an open-label, international, phase 3 randomised, controlled trial. Consenting patients with newly diagnosed, resectable, high-grade osteosarcoma aged 40 years or younger were eligible for randomisation. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either postoperative cisplatin, doxorubicin, and methotrexate (MAP) or MAP plus ifosfamide and etoposide (MAPIE) using concealed permuted blocks with three stratification factors: trial group; location of tumour (proximal femur or proximal humerus vs other limb vs axial skeleton); and presence of metastases (no vs yes or possible). The MAP regimen consisted of cisplatin 120 mg/m2, doxorubicin 37·5 mg/m2 per day on days 1 and 2 (on weeks 1 and 6) followed 3 weeks later by high-dose methotrexate 12 g/m2 over 4 h. The MAPIE regimen consisted of MAP as a base regimen, with the addition of high-dose ifosfamide (14 g/m2) at 2·8 g/m2 per day with equidose mesna uroprotection, followed by etoposide 100 mg/m2 per day over 1 h on days 1-5. The primary outcome measure was event-free survival measured in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00134030. FINDINGS: Between April 14, 2005, and June 30, 2011, 2260 patients were registered from 325 sites in 17 countries. 618 patients with poor response were randomly assigned; 310 to receive MAP and 308 to receive MAPIE. Median follow-up was 62·1 months (IQR 46·6-76·6); 62·3 months (IQR 46·9-77·1) for the MAP group and 61·1 months (IQR 46·5-75·3) for the MAPIE group. 307 event-free survival events were reported (153 in the MAP group vs 154 in the MAPIE group). 193 deaths were reported (101 in the MAP group vs 92 in the MAPIE group). Event-free survival did not differ between treatment groups (hazard ratio [HR] 0·98 [95% CI 0·78-1·23]); hazards were non-proportional (p=0·0003). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (268 [89%] patients in MAP vs 268 [90%] in MAPIE), thrombocytopenia (231 [78% in MAP vs 248 [83%] in MAPIE), and febrile neutropenia without documented infection (149 [50%] in MAP vs 217 [73%] in MAPIE). MAPIE was associated with more frequent grade 4 non-haematological toxicity than MAP (35 [12%] of 301 in the MAP group vs 71 [24%] of 298 in the MAPIE group). Two patients died during postoperative therapy, one from infection (although their absolute neutrophil count was normal), which was definitely related to their MAP treatment (specifically doxorubicin and cisplatin), and one from left ventricular systolic dysfunction, which was probably related to MAPIE treatment (specifically doxorubicin). One suspected unexpected serious adverse reaction was reported in the MAP group: bone marrow infarction due to methotrexate. INTERPRETATION: EURAMOS-1 results do not support the addition of ifosfamide and etoposide to postoperative chemotherapy in patients with poorly responding osteosarcoma because its administration was associated with increased toxicity without improving event-free survival. The results define standard of care for this population. New strategies are required to improve outcomes in this setting. FUNDING: UK Medical Research Council, National Cancer Institute, European Science Foundation, St Anna Kinderkrebsforschung, Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek-Vlaanderen, Parents Organization, Danish Medical Research Council, Academy of Finland, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Deutsche Krebshilfe, Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Semmelweis Foundation, ZonMw (Council for Medical Research), Research Council of Norway, Scandinavian Sarcoma Group, Swiss Paediatric Oncology Group, Cancer Research UK, National Institute for Health Research, University College London Hospitals, and Biomedical Research Centre.

• MeSH
• dítě MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• kojenec MeSH
• kombinovaná terapie MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mladiství MeSH
• nádory kostí farmakoterapie   mortalita   MeSH
• osteosarkom farmakoterapie   mortalita   MeSH
• předškolní dítě MeSH
• protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie terapeutické užití   MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• Check Tag
• dítě MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• kojenec MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mladiství MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• předškolní dítě MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
• srovnávací studie MeSH

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine (2-CdA), a purine nucleoside analog, in treating recurrent Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) in children. This study retrospectively analysed the clinical records of 13 patients who were seen in the department for recurrent LCH. These patients were treated consecutively with 2-CdA chemotherapy between July 1997 and May 2005. Median age at diagnosis was 4 years 7 months and median pre-treatment duration of disease was 16.4 months. Four children received 0.1 mg kg-1 per day for 7 days and nine patients 5 mg m-2 per day for 5 days, repeated every 21 days. The maximum number of courses of 2-CdA per patient was limited to six. Seventy-six courses of 2-CdA were administered without difficulty. All 13 patients (100%) had a clinical response documented by radiographic investigation. Nine patients did not require additional therapy and remain in complete remission (CR). Four remaining children are currently disease-free after receiving other therapy as irradiation (two cases) or maintenance chemotherapy (vinblastine, prednisone and 6-mercaptopurine) (one case) or chemotherapy (vinblastine) + irradiation (one child) ( Table I). Hematologic toxicity was minimal and no infectious complications were documented. Median follow-up after initiation of 2-CdA treatment was 4 years 3 months (range 7 months - 8 years 2 months). This experience confirms the reported efficacy of 2-CdA in the treatment of LCH. However, further studies are needed to determine the role of this agent in high-risk patient who did not achieve complete remission after 2-CdA administration.

• MeSH
• dítě MeSH
• histiocytóza z Langerhansových buněk farmakoterapie   patologie   MeSH
• imunosupresiva terapeutické užití   MeSH
• indukce remise MeSH
• kladribin terapeutické užití   MeSH
• kojenec MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• lokální recidiva nádoru farmakoterapie   patologie   MeSH
• mladiství MeSH
• předškolní dítě MeSH
• přežití bez známek nemoci MeSH
• retrospektivní studie MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• dítě MeSH
• kojenec MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mladiství MeSH
• předškolní dítě MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• práce podpořená grantem MeSH
• Názvy látek
• imunosupresiva MeSH
• kladribin MeSH