-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Surgical technique in distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review of randomized trials
F. Cečka, B. Jon, Z. Subrt, A. Ferko,
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, metaanalýza, práce podpořená grantem, přehledy
NLK
Free Medical Journals
od 2013
PubMed Central
od 2013
Europe PubMed Central
od 2013
ProQuest Central
od 2013
Open Access Digital Library
od 2001-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2012-12-04
Open Access Digital Library
od 2013-01-01
CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCOhost)
od 2013-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2013-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2013
Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles
od 2001
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2013
PubMed
24971333
DOI
10.1155/2014/482906
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- pankreas chirurgie MeSH
- pankreatektomie * MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- metaanalýza MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
Despite recent improvements in surgical technique, the morbidity of distal pancreatectomy remains high, with pancreatic fistula being the most significant postoperative complication. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) dealing with surgical techniques in distal pancreatectomy was carried out to summarize up-to-date knowledge on this topic. The Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, Embase, Web of Science, and Pubmed were searched for relevant articles published from 1990 to December 2013. Ten RCTs were identified and included in the systematic review, with a total of 1286 patients being randomized (samples ranging from 41 to 450). The reviewers were in agreement for application of the eligibility criteria for study selection. It was not possible to carry out meta-analysis of these studies because of the heterogeneity of surgical techniques and approaches, such as varying methods of pancreas transection, reinforcement of the stump with seromuscular patch or pancreaticoenteric anastomosis, sealing with fibrin sealants and pancreatic stent placement. Management of the pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatectomy is still a matter of debate. The results of this systematic review are possibly biased by methodological problems in some of the included studies. New well designed and carefully conducted RCTs must be performed to establish the optimal strategy for pancreatic remnant management after distal pancreatectomy.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc15031981
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20151008114057.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 151005s2014 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1155/2014/482906 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)24971333
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Cečka, Filip $u Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Hradec Králové, Sokolská 581, 500 05 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Surgical technique in distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review of randomized trials / $c F. Cečka, B. Jon, Z. Subrt, A. Ferko,
- 520 9_
- $a Despite recent improvements in surgical technique, the morbidity of distal pancreatectomy remains high, with pancreatic fistula being the most significant postoperative complication. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) dealing with surgical techniques in distal pancreatectomy was carried out to summarize up-to-date knowledge on this topic. The Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, Embase, Web of Science, and Pubmed were searched for relevant articles published from 1990 to December 2013. Ten RCTs were identified and included in the systematic review, with a total of 1286 patients being randomized (samples ranging from 41 to 450). The reviewers were in agreement for application of the eligibility criteria for study selection. It was not possible to carry out meta-analysis of these studies because of the heterogeneity of surgical techniques and approaches, such as varying methods of pancreas transection, reinforcement of the stump with seromuscular patch or pancreaticoenteric anastomosis, sealing with fibrin sealants and pancreatic stent placement. Management of the pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatectomy is still a matter of debate. The results of this systematic review are possibly biased by methodological problems in some of the included studies. New well designed and carefully conducted RCTs must be performed to establish the optimal strategy for pancreatic remnant management after distal pancreatectomy.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a pankreas $x chirurgie $7 D010179
- 650 12
- $a pankreatektomie $7 D010180
- 650 12
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma $7 D016032
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a metaanalýza $7 D017418
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Jon, Bohumil $u Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Hradec Králové, Sokolská 581, 500 05 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Subrt, Zdeněk $u Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Hradec Králové, Sokolská 581, 500 05 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic ; Department of Field Surgery, Military Health Science Faculty Hradec Králové, Defence University Brno, Třebešská 1575, 500 01 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Ferko, Alexander $u Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Hradec Králové, Sokolská 581, 500 05 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00182164 $t BioMed research international $x 2314-6141 $g Roč. 2014, č. - (2014), s. 482906
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24971333 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20151005 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20151008114243 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1092857 $s 915107
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2014 $b 2014 $c - $d 482906 $e 20140529 $i 2314-6141 $m BioMed research international $n Biomed Res Int $x MED00182164
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20151005