-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Steady-state bioequivalence studies of two memantine tablet and oral solution formulations in healthy volunteers
Jaroslav Chládek, Bořek Žaludek, Petr Sova, Aleš Franc, Luděk Šišpera, Jiřina Martínková, Stanislav Mičuda, Jolana Cermanová
Jazyk angličtina Země Česko
NLK
Free Medical Journals
od 2003 do 2013
Freely Accessible Science Journals
od 2003 do 2013
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2002
- Klíčová slova
- Akatinol Memantine,
- MeSH
- Alzheimerova nemoc farmakoterapie MeSH
- chromatografie plynová metody využití MeSH
- financování organizované MeSH
- interpretace statistických dat MeSH
- memantin aplikace a dávkování farmakokinetika MeSH
The bioavailability of memantine was compared using two tablet (Memantine LACHEMA 10 tbl. obd. and Akatinol® Memantine 10 tbl. obd., Study A) and two oral solution formulations (Memantine LACHEMA gtt. and Akatinol® Memantine gtt., Study B) containing 10 mg memantine hydrochloride in two randomized, two-period, two-sequence, crossover studies with 24 healthy volunteers. In both study periods, memantine concentrations were determined by gas-chromatography with electron-capture detection in plasma samples taken at the steady state after 22 days of once-daily dosing. The arithmetic mean (SD) pharmacokinetic parameters in the studies A and B were: AUC0-0t,ss 768 (141) vs. 727 (99) and 807 (154) vs. 836 (156) ng/ml h, Cmax,ss 37.3 (6.1) vs. 35.2 (4.5) and 39.2 (7.3) vs. 40.6 (6.7) ng/ml. Median values of Tmax were in the range of 4 to 5 h. Both tablet and oral solution formulations were found bioequivalent (90%-confidence intervals for AUC0-t,ss, Cmax,ss and Ct,ss within 101–114% (Study A) and 92 and 104% (Study B)). For the peak-trough fluctuation, the bioequivalence intervals were 85–107% and 86–04%, respectively. By pooled analysis of both studies, the geometric mean (90% CI) relative bioavailability of memantine from tablets compared to oral solutions was 91% (85–98).
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
Lit.: 10
- 000
- 03285naa 2200445 a 4500
- 001
- bmc07506392
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20111210122609.0
- 008
- 080708s2008 xr e eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.32725/jab.2008.006 $2 doi
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Chládek, Jaroslav, $d 1962- $7 xx0057856
- 245 10
- $a Steady-state bioequivalence studies of two memantine tablet and oral solution formulations in healthy volunteers / $c Jaroslav Chládek, Bořek Žaludek, Petr Sova, Aleš Franc, Luděk Šišpera, Jiřina Martínková, Stanislav Mičuda, Jolana Cermanová
- 314 __
- $a Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Hradec Králové
- 504 __
- $a Lit.: 10
- 520 9_
- $a The bioavailability of memantine was compared using two tablet (Memantine LACHEMA 10 tbl. obd. and Akatinol® Memantine 10 tbl. obd., Study A) and two oral solution formulations (Memantine LACHEMA gtt. and Akatinol® Memantine gtt., Study B) containing 10 mg memantine hydrochloride in two randomized, two-period, two-sequence, crossover studies with 24 healthy volunteers. In both study periods, memantine concentrations were determined by gas-chromatography with electron-capture detection in plasma samples taken at the steady state after 22 days of once-daily dosing. The arithmetic mean (SD) pharmacokinetic parameters in the studies A and B were: AUC0-0t,ss 768 (141) vs. 727 (99) and 807 (154) vs. 836 (156) ng/ml h, Cmax,ss 37.3 (6.1) vs. 35.2 (4.5) and 39.2 (7.3) vs. 40.6 (6.7) ng/ml. Median values of Tmax were in the range of 4 to 5 h. Both tablet and oral solution formulations were found bioequivalent (90%-confidence intervals for AUC0-t,ss, Cmax,ss and Ct,ss within 101–114% (Study A) and 92 and 104% (Study B)). For the peak-trough fluctuation, the bioequivalence intervals were 85–107% and 86–04%, respectively. By pooled analysis of both studies, the geometric mean (90% CI) relative bioavailability of memantine from tablets compared to oral solutions was 91% (85–98).
- 650 _2
- $a financování organizované $7 D005381
- 650 _2
- $a memantin $x aplikace a dávkování $x farmakokinetika $7 D008559
- 650 _2
- $a Alzheimerova nemoc $x farmakoterapie $7 D000544
- 650 _2
- $a chromatografie plynová $x metody $x využití $7 D002849
- 650 _2
- $a interpretace statistických dat $7 D003627
- 653 00
- $a Akatinol Memantine
- 700 1_
- $a Žaludek, Bořek $7 xx0112315
- 700 1_
- $a Sova, Petr $7 xx0140826
- 700 1_
- $a Franc, Aleš. $7 mzk2008479726
- 700 1_
- $a Šišpera, Luděk, $d 1953- $7 xx0076491
- 700 1_
- $a Martínková, Jiřina, $d 1940- $7 nlk19990073537
- 700 1_
- $a Mičuda, Stanislav, $d 1972- $7 jn20010309083
- 700 1_
- $a Cermanová, Jolana, $d 1965- $7 xx0076211
- 773 0_
- $w MED00012667 $t Journal of applied biomedicine $g Roč. 6, č. 1 (2008), s. 39-45 $x 1214-021X
- 856 41
- $u https://jab.zsf.jcu.cz/pdfs/jab/2008/01/06.pdf $y plný text volně přístupný
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b B 2301 $c 1249 $y 1
- 990 __
- $a 20080708132342 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20080909100943 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 622017 $s 474450
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BMC __
- $a 2008 $b 6 $c 1 $d 39-45 $i 1214-021X $m Journal of Applied Biomedicine $x MED00012667
- LZP __
- $a 2008-8/mkal