-
Something wrong with this record ?
Omezení hybnosti kolenního kloubu po implantaci totální endoprotézy
[Restricted motion after total knee arthroplasty]
Tomáš Kučera, K. Urban, K. Karpaš, P. Šponer
Language Czech Country Czech Republic
- MeSH
- Osteoarthritis, Knee prevention & control therapy MeSH
- Data Interpretation, Statistical MeSH
- Mobility Limitation MeSH
- Postoperative Complications prevention & control MeSH
- Postoperative Care methods rehabilitation MeSH
- Reoperation methods utilization MeSH
- Range of Motion, Articular physiology MeSH
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee methods adverse effects utilization MeSH
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The aim of the study was to ascertain what proportion of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) complain of restricted knee joint motion, and to investigate options for improvement of this situation. MATERIAL Our evaluation included a group of 796 patients treated with TKA at our department in the period from January 1, 1990, to December 31, 2004. In all cases, a condylar implant with preservation of the posterior cruciate ligaments was used. METHODS In addition to medical history, the range of motion, knee joint malalignment and radiological findings were assessed before surgery. After THA, the type of implant and complications, if any, were recorded, and improvement in joint motion was followed up. Based on the results of Kim et al., flexion contracture equal to or higher than 15 degrees and/or flexion less than 75 degrees were made the criteria of stiffness after THA. Patients with restricted THA motion who had aseptic or septic implant loosening were not included. RESULTS Of the 796 evaluated patients, 32 (4.14 %) showed restricted motion after total knee arthroplasty, as assessed by the established criteria. In 16 patients, stiffness defined by these criteria had existed before surgery, and three patients showed an excessive production of adhesions and heterotopic ossifications. In three patients, the implantation procedure resulted in an elevated level of the original joint line and subsequent development of patella infera and increased tension of the posterior cruciate ligament. Four patients declined physical therapy and, in six, the main cause of stiffness could not be found. Seventeen patients did not require surgical therapy for restricted motion; TKA provided significant pain relief and they considered the range of motion achieved to be sufficient. One patient underwent redress 3 months after surgery, but with no success. Repeated releases of adhesions, replacement of a polyethylene liner and revision surgery of the extensor knee structures were performed in 15 patients. In these, the average value of knee flexion increased by 17°only and, in the patients suffering from excessive adhesion production, this value remained almost unchanged. Revision TKA was carried out in four patients, in whom knee joint flexion increased on average by degrees to achieve an average flexion of degrees. DISCUSSION Restricted motion after TKA has been reported to range from 1.3 % to 12.0 %, but consistent criteria have not been set up. In our study it was 4.14 %. In agreement with the literature data, one of the reasons was pre-operative restricted motion, which was recorded in 16 of 32 patients. Similarly, also in our patients, biological predisposition to excessive production of fibrocartilage associated with adhesions in all knee joint compartments was the major therapeutic problem. Intra-operative fractures, ligament tears requiring post-operative fixation and unremoved dorsal osteophytes lead to the restriction of knee joint motion. By inadequate resection of articular surface, the original joint line may be at a higher level; this results in an increased tension of the posterior cruciate ligament and patella infera development, both influencing knee flexion. In our study, three patients were affected. Knee joint stiffness can also develop in patients declining physical therapy or in whom this is not correctly performed, often for insufficient analgesia. In contrast to the data reported in the literature, 17 of 32 patients in this study had no need for surgical treatment of restricted knee joint motion. Redress under general anesthesia was not effective. For markedly restricted motion of the knee joint, reimplantation can be recommended or, in less severe cases, an intervention on adjacent soft tissues. CONCLUSIONS Restricted motion of the knee joint after TKA is difficult to treat and, therefore, prevention is recommended. This should include thorough conservative treatment of gonarthrosis, early indication for surgery, prevention of elevation in the joint line and consistent rehabilitation with appropriate analgesia. For severe stiffness of the knee joint, as evaluated by the criteria of Kim et al., revision arthroplasty can be recommended.
Restricted motion after total knee arthroplasty
Lit.: 25
- 000
- 06235naa 2200433 a 4500
- 001
- bmc07509948
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20161214085908.0
- 008
- 081005s2007 xr e cze||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $2 doi $a 10.55095/achot2007/050
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a cze $b eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Kučera, Tomáš $7 xx0208976
- 245 10
- $a Omezení hybnosti kolenního kloubu po implantaci totální endoprotézy / $c Tomáš Kučera, K. Urban, K. Karpaš, P. Šponer
- 246 11
- $a Restricted motion after total knee arthroplasty
- 314 __
- $a Ortopedická klinika FN a LF UK, Hradec Králové
- 504 __
- $a Lit.: 25
- 520 9_
- $a PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The aim of the study was to ascertain what proportion of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) complain of restricted knee joint motion, and to investigate options for improvement of this situation. MATERIAL Our evaluation included a group of 796 patients treated with TKA at our department in the period from January 1, 1990, to December 31, 2004. In all cases, a condylar implant with preservation of the posterior cruciate ligaments was used. METHODS In addition to medical history, the range of motion, knee joint malalignment and radiological findings were assessed before surgery. After THA, the type of implant and complications, if any, were recorded, and improvement in joint motion was followed up. Based on the results of Kim et al., flexion contracture equal to or higher than 15 degrees and/or flexion less than 75 degrees were made the criteria of stiffness after THA. Patients with restricted THA motion who had aseptic or septic implant loosening were not included. RESULTS Of the 796 evaluated patients, 32 (4.14 %) showed restricted motion after total knee arthroplasty, as assessed by the established criteria. In 16 patients, stiffness defined by these criteria had existed before surgery, and three patients showed an excessive production of adhesions and heterotopic ossifications. In three patients, the implantation procedure resulted in an elevated level of the original joint line and subsequent development of patella infera and increased tension of the posterior cruciate ligament. Four patients declined physical therapy and, in six, the main cause of stiffness could not be found. Seventeen patients did not require surgical therapy for restricted motion; TKA provided significant pain relief and they considered the range of motion achieved to be sufficient. One patient underwent redress 3 months after surgery, but with no success. Repeated releases of adhesions, replacement of a polyethylene liner and revision surgery of the extensor knee structures were performed in 15 patients. In these, the average value of knee flexion increased by 17°only and, in the patients suffering from excessive adhesion production, this value remained almost unchanged. Revision TKA was carried out in four patients, in whom knee joint flexion increased on average by degrees to achieve an average flexion of degrees. DISCUSSION Restricted motion after TKA has been reported to range from 1.3 % to 12.0 %, but consistent criteria have not been set up. In our study it was 4.14 %. In agreement with the literature data, one of the reasons was pre-operative restricted motion, which was recorded in 16 of 32 patients. Similarly, also in our patients, biological predisposition to excessive production of fibrocartilage associated with adhesions in all knee joint compartments was the major therapeutic problem. Intra-operative fractures, ligament tears requiring post-operative fixation and unremoved dorsal osteophytes lead to the restriction of knee joint motion. By inadequate resection of articular surface, the original joint line may be at a higher level; this results in an increased tension of the posterior cruciate ligament and patella infera development, both influencing knee flexion. In our study, three patients were affected. Knee joint stiffness can also develop in patients declining physical therapy or in whom this is not correctly performed, often for insufficient analgesia. In contrast to the data reported in the literature, 17 of 32 patients in this study had no need for surgical treatment of restricted knee joint motion. Redress under general anesthesia was not effective. For markedly restricted motion of the knee joint, reimplantation can be recommended or, in less severe cases, an intervention on adjacent soft tissues. CONCLUSIONS Restricted motion of the knee joint after TKA is difficult to treat and, therefore, prevention is recommended. This should include thorough conservative treatment of gonarthrosis, early indication for surgery, prevention of elevation in the joint line and consistent rehabilitation with appropriate analgesia. For severe stiffness of the knee joint, as evaluated by the criteria of Kim et al., revision arthroplasty can be recommended.
- 650 _2
- $a totální endoprotéza kolene $x metody $x škodlivé účinky $x využití $7 D019645
- 650 _2
- $a omezení pohyblivosti $7 D051346
- 650 _2
- $a rozsah kloubních pohybů $x fyziologie $7 D016059
- 650 _2
- $a reoperace $x metody $x využití $7 D012086
- 650 _2
- $a artróza kolenních kloubů $x prevence a kontrola $x terapie $7 D020370
- 650 _2
- $a pooperační komplikace $x prevence a kontrola $7 D011183
- 650 _2
- $a pooperační péče $x metody $x rehabilitace $7 D011182
- 650 _2
- $a interpretace statistických dat $7 D003627
- 700 1_
- $a Urban, Karel, $d 1943- $7 skuk0005685
- 700 1_
- $a Karpaš, Karel, $d 1944- $7 jn20000710159
- 700 1_
- $a Šponer, Pavel, $d 1969- $7 xx0035643
- 773 0_
- $w MED00011021 $t Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae čechoslovaca $g Roč. 74, č. 5 (2007), s. 326-331 $x 0001-5415
- 856 41
- $u http://www.achot.cz/dwnld/0705_326.pdf $y plný text volně přístupný
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b A 8 $c 507 $y 1 $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20081005142126 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20161214085926 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 625538 $s 477973
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BMC __
- $a 2007 $b 74 $c 5 $d 326-331 $i 0001-5415 $m Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca $x MED00011021
- LZP __
- $a 2008-34/vtal