• Something wrong with this record ?

Přesnost CT angiografie věnčitých tepen
[Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography]

W. Bob Meijboom, et al.

. 2009 ; 3 (3) : 22.

Language Czech Country Czech Republic

Document type Multicenter Study

Persistent link   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc09002288

This study sought to determine the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomographic coronary angiography (CTCA) to detect or rule out significant coronary artery disease (CAD). BACKGROUND: CTCA is emerging as a noninvasive technique to detect coronary atherosclerosis. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study involving 360 symptomatic patients with acute and stable anginal syndromes who were between 50 and 70 years of age and were referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography (CCA) from September 2004 through June 2006. All patients underwent a nonenhanced calcium scan and a CTCA, which was compared with CCA. No patients or segments were excluded because of impaired image quality attributable to either coronary motion or calcifications. Patient-, vessel-, and segment-based sensitivities and specificities were calculated to detect or rule out significant CAD, defined as >or=50% lumen diameter reduction. RESULTS: The prevalence among patients of having at least 1 significant stenosis was 68%. In a patient-based analysis, the sensitivity for detecting patients with significant CAD was 99% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 98% to 100%), specificity was 64% (95% CI: 55% to 73%), positive predictive value was 86% (95% CI: 82% to 90%), and negative predictive value was 97% (95% CI: 94% to 100%). In a segment-based analysis, the sensitivity was 88% (95% CI: 85% to 91%), specificity was 90% (95% CI: 89% to 92%), positive predictive value was 47% (95% CI: 44% to 51%), and negative predictive value was 99% (95% CI: 98% to 99%). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients in whom a decision had already been made to obtain CCA, 64-slice CTCA was reliable for ruling out significant CAD in patients with stable and unstable anginal syndromes. A positive 64-slice CTCA scan often overestimates the severity of atherosclerotic obstructions and requires further testing to guide patient management.

Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography

Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study

Recenze v:

Komentář [k článku Přesnost CT angiografie věnčitých tepen].

000      
00000naa 2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc09002288
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20111210152420.0
008      
091105s2009 xr e cze||
009      
AR
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a cze $b eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Meijboom, W. Bob
245    10
$a Přesnost CT angiografie věnčitých tepen / $c W. Bob Meijboom, et al.
246    11
$a Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography
246    13
$a Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study
314    __
$a Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam
520    9_
$a This study sought to determine the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomographic coronary angiography (CTCA) to detect or rule out significant coronary artery disease (CAD). BACKGROUND: CTCA is emerging as a noninvasive technique to detect coronary atherosclerosis. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study involving 360 symptomatic patients with acute and stable anginal syndromes who were between 50 and 70 years of age and were referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography (CCA) from September 2004 through June 2006. All patients underwent a nonenhanced calcium scan and a CTCA, which was compared with CCA. No patients or segments were excluded because of impaired image quality attributable to either coronary motion or calcifications. Patient-, vessel-, and segment-based sensitivities and specificities were calculated to detect or rule out significant CAD, defined as >or=50% lumen diameter reduction. RESULTS: The prevalence among patients of having at least 1 significant stenosis was 68%. In a patient-based analysis, the sensitivity for detecting patients with significant CAD was 99% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 98% to 100%), specificity was 64% (95% CI: 55% to 73%), positive predictive value was 86% (95% CI: 82% to 90%), and negative predictive value was 97% (95% CI: 94% to 100%). In a segment-based analysis, the sensitivity was 88% (95% CI: 85% to 91%), specificity was 90% (95% CI: 89% to 92%), positive predictive value was 47% (95% CI: 44% to 51%), and negative predictive value was 99% (95% CI: 98% to 99%). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients in whom a decision had already been made to obtain CCA, 64-slice CTCA was reliable for ruling out significant CAD in patients with stable and unstable anginal syndromes. A positive 64-slice CTCA scan often overestimates the severity of atherosclerotic obstructions and requires further testing to guide patient management.
650    _2
$a financování organizované $7 D005381
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a interval spolehlivosti $7 D016001
650    _2
$a koronární angiografie $x metody $7 D017023
650    _2
$a nemoci koronárních tepen $x patofyziologie $x radiografie $7 D003324
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a prediktivní hodnota testů $7 D011237
650    _2
$a prevalence $7 D015995
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
650    _2
$a počítačová rentgenová tomografie $7 D014057
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
773    0_
$w MED00012706 $t Clinical cardiology alert $g Roč. 3, č. 3 (2009), s. 22 $x 1213-2586
787    18
$w bmc09002292 $i Recenze v: $t Komentář [k článku Přesnost CT angiografie věnčitých tepen]
910    __
$a ABA008 $b B 2242 $c 407 a $y 9
990    __
$a 20091105082547 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20091201103324 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 691459 $s 553358
BAS    __
$a 3
BMC    __
$a 2009 $b 3 $c 3 $d 22 $i 1213-2586 $m Clinical Cardiology Alert $x MED00012706
LZP    __
$a 2009-34/mkme

Find record

Citation metrics

Archiving options