• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Globální genomový vzorec predikuje prognózu u neuroblastomu
[Overall genomic pattern is a predictor of outcome in neuroblastoma]

Isabelle Janoueix-Lerosey, Gudrun Schleiermacher, Evi Michels, Véronique Mosseri, Agnes Ribeiro, Delphine Lequin, Joëlle Vermeulen, Jérôme Couturier, Michel Peuchmaur, Alexander Valent, Dominique Plantaz, Hervé Rubie, Dominique Valteau-Couanet,...

Jazyk čeština Země Česko

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, multicentrická studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc09003086

For a comprehensive overview of the genetic alterations of neuroblastoma, their association and clinical significance, we conducted a whole-genome DNA copy number analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A series of 493 neuroblastoma (NB) samples was investigated by array-based comparative genomic hybridization in two consecutive steps (224, then 269 patients). RESULTS: Genomic analysis identified several types of profiles. Tumors presenting exclusively whole-chromosome copy number variations were associated with excellent survival. No disease-related death was observed in this group. In contrast, tumors with any type of segmental chromosome alterations characterized patients with a high risk of relapse. Patients with both numerical and segmental abnormalities clearly shared the higher risk of relapse of segmental-only patients. In a multivariate analysis, taking into account the genomic profile, but also previously described individual genetic and clinical markers with prognostic significance, the presence of segmental alterations with (HR, 7.3; 95% CI, 3.7 to 14.5; P < .001) or without MYCN amplification (HR, 4.5; 95% CI, 2.4 to 8.4; P < .001) was the strongest predictor of relapse; the other significant variables were age older than 18 months (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2 to 2.8; P = .004) and stage 4 (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2 to 2.7; P = .005). Finally, within tumors showing segmental alterations, stage 4, age, MYCN amplification, 1p and 11q deletions, and 1q gain were independent predictors of decreased overall survival. CONCLUSION: The analysis of the overall genomic pattern, which probably unravels particular genomic instability mechanisms rather than the analysis of individual markers, is essential to predict relapse in NB patients. It adds critical prognostic information to conventional markers and should be included in future treatment stratification.

Overall genomic pattern is a predictor of outcome in neuroblastoma

Bibliografie atd.

Lit.: 39

000      
00000naa 2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc09003086
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20161229083603.0
008      
091113s2009 xr e cze||
009      
AR
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a cze $b eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Janoueix-Lerosey, I.
245    10
$a Globální genomový vzorec predikuje prognózu u neuroblastomu / $c Isabelle Janoueix-Lerosey, Gudrun Schleiermacher, Evi Michels, Véronique Mosseri, Agnes Ribeiro, Delphine Lequin, Joëlle Vermeulen, Jérôme Couturier, Michel Peuchmaur, Alexander Valent, Dominique Plantaz, Hervé Rubie, Dominique Valteau-Couanet, Caroline Th omas, Valérie Combaret, Raphaël Rousseau, Angelika Eggert, Jean Michon, Frank Speleman a Olivier Delattre
246    11
$a Overall genomic pattern is a predictor of outcome in neuroblastoma
314    __
$a INSERM U830, Laboratoire de Génétique et Biologie des Cancers, Paris olivier.delattre@curie.fr
504    __
$a Lit.: 39
520    9_
$a For a comprehensive overview of the genetic alterations of neuroblastoma, their association and clinical significance, we conducted a whole-genome DNA copy number analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A series of 493 neuroblastoma (NB) samples was investigated by array-based comparative genomic hybridization in two consecutive steps (224, then 269 patients). RESULTS: Genomic analysis identified several types of profiles. Tumors presenting exclusively whole-chromosome copy number variations were associated with excellent survival. No disease-related death was observed in this group. In contrast, tumors with any type of segmental chromosome alterations characterized patients with a high risk of relapse. Patients with both numerical and segmental abnormalities clearly shared the higher risk of relapse of segmental-only patients. In a multivariate analysis, taking into account the genomic profile, but also previously described individual genetic and clinical markers with prognostic significance, the presence of segmental alterations with (HR, 7.3; 95% CI, 3.7 to 14.5; P < .001) or without MYCN amplification (HR, 4.5; 95% CI, 2.4 to 8.4; P < .001) was the strongest predictor of relapse; the other significant variables were age older than 18 months (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2 to 2.8; P = .004) and stage 4 (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2 to 2.7; P = .005). Finally, within tumors showing segmental alterations, stage 4, age, MYCN amplification, 1p and 11q deletions, and 1q gain were independent predictors of decreased overall survival. CONCLUSION: The analysis of the overall genomic pattern, which probably unravels particular genomic instability mechanisms rather than the analysis of individual markers, is essential to predict relapse in NB patients. It adds critical prognostic information to conventional markers and should be included in future treatment stratification.
650    _2
$a financování organizované $7 D005381
650    _2
$a srovnávací genomová hybridizace $7 D055028
650    _2
$a DNA nádorová $x genetika $7 D004273
650    _2
$a následné studie $7 D005500
650    _2
$a amplifikace genu $7 D005784
650    _2
$a geny myc $7 D016259
650    _2
$a nestabilita genomu $7 D042822
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a kojenec $7 D007223
650    _2
$a multivariační analýza $7 D015999
650    _2
$a neuroblastom $x genetika $x patologie $7 D009447
650    _2
$a sekvenční analýza hybridizací s uspořádaným souborem oligonukleotidů $7 D020411
650    _2
$a prognóza $7 D011379
650    _2
$a proporcionální rizikové modely $7 D016016
650    _2
$a analýza přežití $7 D016019
650    _2
$a nádorové biomarkery $7 D014408
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
700    1_
$a Schleiermacher, G.
700    1_
$a Michels, E.
700    1_
$a Mosseri, V.
700    1_
$a Ribeiro, A.
700    1_
$a Lequin, D.
700    1_
$a Vermeulen, J.
700    1_
$a Couturier, J.
700    1_
$a Peuchmaur, M.
700    1_
$a Valent, A.
700    1_
$a Plantaz, D.
700    1_
$a Rubie, H.
700    1_
$a Valteau-Couanet, H.
700    1_
$a Thomas, Carlos, $d 1931-2016 $7 ola20050406002
700    1_
$a Combaret, V.
773    0_
$w MED00164415 $t Journal of clinical oncology $g Roč. 1, č. 2 (2009), s. 65-72 $x 1803-8506
856    41
$u http://www.tribune.cz/clanek/14355 $y plný text volně přístupný
910    __
$a ABA008 $b B 2589 $c 655 a $y 9 $z 0
990    __
$a 20091113115224 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20161229083645 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 692253 $s 554164
BAS    __
$a 3
BMC    __
$a 2009 $b 1 $c 2 $d 65-72 $i 1803-8506 $m Journal of Clinical Oncology (České vyd.) $x MED00164415
LZP    __
$a 2009-37/mkme

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...