-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Dlahová osteosyntéza u periprotetických zlomenin typu Vancouver B1 a B2
[Plate osteosynthesis in vancouver type b1 and b2 periprosthetic fractures]
J. Fousek, P. Vašek
Jazyk čeština Země Česko
Typ dokumentu retrospektivní studie, hodnotící studie, následné studie
PubMed
19912706
DOI
10.55095/achot2009/078
- MeSH
- fraktury femuru MeSH
- fraktury kostí MeSH
- fraktury kyčle chirurgie MeSH
- hojení fraktur MeSH
- kostní destičky MeSH
- kyčelní protézy škodlivé účinky MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- náhrada kyčelního kloubu metody škodlivé účinky MeSH
- následné studie MeSH
- reoperace MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- selhání protézy MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- vnitřní fixace fraktury MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- hodnotící studie MeSH
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY In a retrospective study we evaluated the results of plate osteosynthesis for treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures classified as Vancouver types B1 and B2. MATERIAL AND METHODS The group comprised 19 patients with post-operative periprosthetic fractures treated by open reduction and internal fixation with plate osteosynthesis at our department between the beginning of 2004 and June 2007. Perioperative fractures were not included. The average age of the patients was 72.0 (range, 53 to 88) years. A locking compression plate (PCL) was used in 16 patients. The average follow-up was 21 months, with 6 months at least. We evaluated radiographs of the fracture and, in the majority of cases, also those before a periprosthetic fracture occurred. We focussed on the signs of potential femoral component loosening and the course of fracture line; fractures were classified according to the Vancouver classification system. Follow-up included both clinical and radiographic examination. RESULTS Thirteen patients showed bone union and a good functional outcome. One patient was present at follow-up only once and was not included in the final evaluation. Non-union was recorded in five patients (27.7 %), marked implant migration occurred in three (all had type B2 fracture) and osteosynthesis failed in two patients. DISCUSSION We consider the Vancouver classification to be the most suitable classification system. The relatively high proportion of non-union fractures can be accounted for by an inappropriate indication for osteosynthesis in fractures with stem loosening.The assessment of stem stability based on a radiograph only may, in some cases, be questionable;therefore, if doubtful, we prefer an intra-operative evaluation of implant stability. We also discuss a contribution of angle-stable plates to the osteosynthesis of periprosthetic fractures as well as their bone fixation technique. CONCLUSIONS Plate osteosynthesis is a suitable method for treatment of periprosthetic fractures if there is a stable femoral component. LPC implants are not discriminative enough in the range of indications for plate osteosynthesis.The use of plate osteosynthesis in a total hip arthroplasty with signs of loosening is bound to lead to acceleration of loosening and stem migration, and may even result in plate breakage or its expulsion. This implies that, in such THAs, plate osteosynthesis can only be carried out as a palliative procedure in immobile and severely ill old patients.
Plate osteosynthesis in vancouver type b1 and b2 periprosthetic fractures
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
Lit.: 27
- 000
- 00000naa 2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc09006406
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20111210154424.0
- 008
- 091230s2009 xr e cze||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.55095/achot2009/078 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)19912706
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a cze $b eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Fousek, Jiří $7 xx0100092
- 245 10
- $a Dlahová osteosyntéza u periprotetických zlomenin typu Vancouver B1 a B2 / $c J. Fousek, P. Vašek
- 246 11
- $a Plate osteosynthesis in vancouver type b1 and b2 periprosthetic fractures
- 314 __
- $a Oddělení ortopedie, traumatologie a rekonstrukční chirurgie Ústřední vojenské nemocnice v Praze
- 504 __
- $a Lit.: 27
- 520 9_
- $a PURPOSE OF THE STUDY In a retrospective study we evaluated the results of plate osteosynthesis for treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures classified as Vancouver types B1 and B2. MATERIAL AND METHODS The group comprised 19 patients with post-operative periprosthetic fractures treated by open reduction and internal fixation with plate osteosynthesis at our department between the beginning of 2004 and June 2007. Perioperative fractures were not included. The average age of the patients was 72.0 (range, 53 to 88) years. A locking compression plate (PCL) was used in 16 patients. The average follow-up was 21 months, with 6 months at least. We evaluated radiographs of the fracture and, in the majority of cases, also those before a periprosthetic fracture occurred. We focussed on the signs of potential femoral component loosening and the course of fracture line; fractures were classified according to the Vancouver classification system. Follow-up included both clinical and radiographic examination. RESULTS Thirteen patients showed bone union and a good functional outcome. One patient was present at follow-up only once and was not included in the final evaluation. Non-union was recorded in five patients (27.7 %), marked implant migration occurred in three (all had type B2 fracture) and osteosynthesis failed in two patients. DISCUSSION We consider the Vancouver classification to be the most suitable classification system. The relatively high proportion of non-union fractures can be accounted for by an inappropriate indication for osteosynthesis in fractures with stem loosening.The assessment of stem stability based on a radiograph only may, in some cases, be questionable;therefore, if doubtful, we prefer an intra-operative evaluation of implant stability. We also discuss a contribution of angle-stable plates to the osteosynthesis of periprosthetic fractures as well as their bone fixation technique. CONCLUSIONS Plate osteosynthesis is a suitable method for treatment of periprosthetic fractures if there is a stable femoral component. LPC implants are not discriminative enough in the range of indications for plate osteosynthesis.The use of plate osteosynthesis in a total hip arthroplasty with signs of loosening is bound to lead to acceleration of loosening and stem migration, and may even result in plate breakage or its expulsion. This implies that, in such THAs, plate osteosynthesis can only be carried out as a palliative procedure in immobile and severely ill old patients.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a náhrada kyčelního kloubu $x metody $x škodlivé účinky $7 D019644
- 650 _2
- $a kyčelní protézy $x škodlivé účinky $7 D006622
- 650 _2
- $a selhání protézy $7 D011475
- 650 _2
- $a fraktury kyčle $x chirurgie $7 D006620
- 650 _2
- $a reoperace $7 D012086
- 650 _2
- $a vnitřní fixace fraktury $7 D005593
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
- 650 _2
- $a kostní destičky $7 D001860
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a fraktury femuru $7 D005264
- 650 _2
- $a hojení fraktur $7 D017102
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a fraktury kostí $7 D050723
- 655 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 655 _2
- $a hodnotící studie $7 D023362
- 655 _2
- $a následné studie $7 D005500
- 700 1_
- $a Vašek, P. $7 _BN003486
- 773 0_
- $w MED00011021 $t Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae čechoslovaca $g Roč. 76, č. 5 (2009), s. 410-416 $x 0001-5415
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b A 8 $c 507 $y 8
- 990 __
- $a 20091230084414 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20100212111425 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 702220 $s 564649
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BMC __
- $a 2009 $b 76 $c 5 $d 410-416 $i 0001-5415 $m Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca $x MED00011021
- LZP __
- $a 2009-66/vtmd