Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Dlahová osteosyntéza u periprotetických zlomenin typu Vancouver B1 a B2
[Plate osteosynthesis in vancouver type b1 and b2 periprosthetic fractures]

J. Fousek, P. Vašek

Jazyk čeština Země Česko

Typ dokumentu retrospektivní studie, hodnotící studie, následné studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc09006406

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY In a retrospective study we evaluated the results of plate osteosynthesis for treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures classified as Vancouver types B1 and B2. MATERIAL AND METHODS The group comprised 19 patients with post-operative periprosthetic fractures treated by open reduction and internal fixation with plate osteosynthesis at our department between the beginning of 2004 and June 2007. Perioperative fractures were not included. The average age of the patients was 72.0 (range, 53 to 88) years. A locking compression plate (PCL) was used in 16 patients. The average follow-up was 21 months, with 6 months at least. We evaluated radiographs of the fracture and, in the majority of cases, also those before a periprosthetic fracture occurred. We focussed on the signs of potential femoral component loosening and the course of fracture line; fractures were classified according to the Vancouver classification system. Follow-up included both clinical and radiographic examination. RESULTS Thirteen patients showed bone union and a good functional outcome. One patient was present at follow-up only once and was not included in the final evaluation. Non-union was recorded in five patients (27.7 %), marked implant migration occurred in three (all had type B2 fracture) and osteosynthesis failed in two patients. DISCUSSION We consider the Vancouver classification to be the most suitable classification system. The relatively high proportion of non-union fractures can be accounted for by an inappropriate indication for osteosynthesis in fractures with stem loosening.The assessment of stem stability based on a radiograph only may, in some cases, be questionable;therefore, if doubtful, we prefer an intra-operative evaluation of implant stability. We also discuss a contribution of angle-stable plates to the osteosynthesis of periprosthetic fractures as well as their bone fixation technique. CONCLUSIONS Plate osteosynthesis is a suitable method for treatment of periprosthetic fractures if there is a stable femoral component. LPC implants are not discriminative enough in the range of indications for plate osteosynthesis.The use of plate osteosynthesis in a total hip arthroplasty with signs of loosening is bound to lead to acceleration of loosening and stem migration, and may even result in plate breakage or its expulsion. This implies that, in such THAs, plate osteosynthesis can only be carried out as a palliative procedure in immobile and severely ill old patients.

Plate osteosynthesis in vancouver type b1 and b2 periprosthetic fractures

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

Bibliografie atd.

Lit.: 27

000      
00000naa 2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc09006406
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20111210154424.0
008      
091230s2009 xr e cze||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.55095/achot2009/078 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)19912706
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a cze $b eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Fousek, Jiří $7 xx0100092
245    10
$a Dlahová osteosyntéza u periprotetických zlomenin typu Vancouver B1 a B2 / $c J. Fousek, P. Vašek
246    11
$a Plate osteosynthesis in vancouver type b1 and b2 periprosthetic fractures
314    __
$a Oddělení ortopedie, traumatologie a rekonstrukční chirurgie Ústřední vojenské nemocnice v Praze
504    __
$a Lit.: 27
520    9_
$a PURPOSE OF THE STUDY In a retrospective study we evaluated the results of plate osteosynthesis for treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures classified as Vancouver types B1 and B2. MATERIAL AND METHODS The group comprised 19 patients with post-operative periprosthetic fractures treated by open reduction and internal fixation with plate osteosynthesis at our department between the beginning of 2004 and June 2007. Perioperative fractures were not included. The average age of the patients was 72.0 (range, 53 to 88) years. A locking compression plate (PCL) was used in 16 patients. The average follow-up was 21 months, with 6 months at least. We evaluated radiographs of the fracture and, in the majority of cases, also those before a periprosthetic fracture occurred. We focussed on the signs of potential femoral component loosening and the course of fracture line; fractures were classified according to the Vancouver classification system. Follow-up included both clinical and radiographic examination. RESULTS Thirteen patients showed bone union and a good functional outcome. One patient was present at follow-up only once and was not included in the final evaluation. Non-union was recorded in five patients (27.7 %), marked implant migration occurred in three (all had type B2 fracture) and osteosynthesis failed in two patients. DISCUSSION We consider the Vancouver classification to be the most suitable classification system. The relatively high proportion of non-union fractures can be accounted for by an inappropriate indication for osteosynthesis in fractures with stem loosening.The assessment of stem stability based on a radiograph only may, in some cases, be questionable;therefore, if doubtful, we prefer an intra-operative evaluation of implant stability. We also discuss a contribution of angle-stable plates to the osteosynthesis of periprosthetic fractures as well as their bone fixation technique. CONCLUSIONS Plate osteosynthesis is a suitable method for treatment of periprosthetic fractures if there is a stable femoral component. LPC implants are not discriminative enough in the range of indications for plate osteosynthesis.The use of plate osteosynthesis in a total hip arthroplasty with signs of loosening is bound to lead to acceleration of loosening and stem migration, and may even result in plate breakage or its expulsion. This implies that, in such THAs, plate osteosynthesis can only be carried out as a palliative procedure in immobile and severely ill old patients.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a náhrada kyčelního kloubu $x metody $x škodlivé účinky $7 D019644
650    _2
$a kyčelní protézy $x škodlivé účinky $7 D006622
650    _2
$a selhání protézy $7 D011475
650    _2
$a fraktury kyčle $x chirurgie $7 D006620
650    _2
$a reoperace $7 D012086
650    _2
$a vnitřní fixace fraktury $7 D005593
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a kostní destičky $7 D001860
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a fraktury femuru $7 D005264
650    _2
$a hojení fraktur $7 D017102
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a fraktury kostí $7 D050723
655    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
655    _2
$a hodnotící studie $7 D023362
655    _2
$a následné studie $7 D005500
700    1_
$a Vašek, P. $7 _BN003486
773    0_
$w MED00011021 $t Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae čechoslovaca $g Roč. 76, č. 5 (2009), s. 410-416 $x 0001-5415
910    __
$a ABA008 $b A 8 $c 507 $y 8
990    __
$a 20091230084414 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20100212111425 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 702220 $s 564649
BAS    __
$a 3
BMC    __
$a 2009 $b 76 $c 5 $d 410-416 $i 0001-5415 $m Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca $x MED00011021
LZP    __
$a 2009-66/vtmd

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...