-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Extrakce infikovaných stimulačních a defibrilačních elektrod
[Percutaneous pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead extraction in 100 patients with intracardiac vegetations defined by transesophageal echocardiogram]
Grammes JA, et al.
Jazyk čeština Země Česko
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie
- MeSH
- defibrilátory implantabilní škodlivé účinky MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- echokardiografie transezofageální MeSH
- elektrokardiografie MeSH
- incidence MeSH
- infekce spojené s protézou diagnóza epidemiologie chirurgie MeSH
- kardiostimulátor škodlivé účinky MeSH
- katetrizace metody MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- míra přežití MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- následné studie MeSH
- odstranění implantátu metody MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- tachykardie terapie MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- srovnávací studie MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Pennsylvania MeSH
We describe the feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes of percutaneous lead extraction in patients at a tertiary care center who had intracardiac vegetations identified by transesophageal echocardiogram. BACKGROUND: Infection in the presence of intracardiac devices is a problem of considerable morbidity and mortality. Patients with intracardiac vegetations are at high risk for complications related to extraction and protracted clinical courses. Historically, lead extraction in this cohort has been managed by surgical thoracotomy. METHODS: We analyzed percutaneous lead extractions performed from January 1991 to September 2007 in infected patients with echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac vegetations, followed by a descriptive and statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 984 patients underwent extraction of 1,838 leads; local or systemic infection occurred in 480 patients. One hundred patients had intracardiac vegetations identified by transesophageal echocardiogram, and all underwent percutaneous lead extraction (215 leads). Mean age was 67 years. Median extraction time was 3 min per lead; median implant duration was 34 months. During the index hospitalization, a new device was implanted in 54 patients at a median of 7 days after extraction. Post-operative 30-day mortality was 10%; no deaths were related directly to the extraction procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with intracardiac vegetations identified on transesophageal echocardiogram can safely undergo complete device extraction using standard percutaneous lead extraction techniques. Permanent devices can safely be reimplanted provided blood cultures remain sterile. The presence of intracardiac vegetations identifies a subset of patients at increased risk for complications and early mortality from systemic infection despite device extraction and appropriate antimicrobial therapy. Copyright 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Percutaneous pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead extraction in 100 patients with intracardiac vegetations defined by transesophageal echocardiogram
- 000
- 00000naa 2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc10028273
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20111210192729.0
- 008
- 101025s2010 xr e cze||
- 009
- AR
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a cze $b eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Grammes, Jon A.
- 245 10
- $a Extrakce infikovaných stimulačních a defibrilačních elektrod / $c Grammes JA, et al.
- 246 11
- $a Percutaneous pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead extraction in 100 patients with intracardiac vegetations defined by transesophageal echocardiogram
- 314 __
- $a Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- 520 9_
- $a We describe the feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes of percutaneous lead extraction in patients at a tertiary care center who had intracardiac vegetations identified by transesophageal echocardiogram. BACKGROUND: Infection in the presence of intracardiac devices is a problem of considerable morbidity and mortality. Patients with intracardiac vegetations are at high risk for complications related to extraction and protracted clinical courses. Historically, lead extraction in this cohort has been managed by surgical thoracotomy. METHODS: We analyzed percutaneous lead extractions performed from January 1991 to September 2007 in infected patients with echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac vegetations, followed by a descriptive and statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 984 patients underwent extraction of 1,838 leads; local or systemic infection occurred in 480 patients. One hundred patients had intracardiac vegetations identified by transesophageal echocardiogram, and all underwent percutaneous lead extraction (215 leads). Mean age was 67 years. Median extraction time was 3 min per lead; median implant duration was 34 months. During the index hospitalization, a new device was implanted in 54 patients at a median of 7 days after extraction. Post-operative 30-day mortality was 10%; no deaths were related directly to the extraction procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with intracardiac vegetations identified on transesophageal echocardiogram can safely undergo complete device extraction using standard percutaneous lead extraction techniques. Permanent devices can safely be reimplanted provided blood cultures remain sterile. The presence of intracardiac vegetations identifies a subset of patients at increased risk for complications and early mortality from systemic infection despite device extraction and appropriate antimicrobial therapy. Copyright 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
- 650 _2
- $a mladiství $7 D000293
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
- 650 _2
- $a katetrizace $x metody $7 D002404
- 650 _2
- $a defibrilátory implantabilní $x škodlivé účinky $7 D017147
- 650 _2
- $a odstranění implantátu $x metody $7 D020878
- 650 _2
- $a echokardiografie transezofageální $7 D017548
- 650 _2
- $a elektrokardiografie $7 D004562
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a následné studie $7 D005500
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a incidence $7 D015994
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a kardiostimulátor $x škodlivé účinky $7 D010138
- 650 _2
- $a infekce spojené s protézou $x diagnóza $x epidemiologie $x chirurgie $7 D016459
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 _2
- $a míra přežití $7 D015996
- 650 _2
- $a tachykardie $x terapie $7 D013610
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 651 _2
- $a Pennsylvania $x epidemiologie $7 D010414
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 773 0_
- $w MED00012706 $t Clinical cardiology alert $g Roč. 4, č. 4 (2010), s. 29-30 $x 1213-2586
- 787 18
- $w bmc10028274 $i Recenze v: $t Komentář [k článku Extrakce infikovaných stimulačních a defibrilačních elektrod]
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b B 2242 $c 407 a $y 7
- 990 __
- $a 20101013125906 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20110131102239 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 803387 $s 668160
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BMC __
- $a 2010 $b 4 $c 4 $d 29-30 $m Clinical Cardiology Alert $x MED00012706
- LZP __
- $a 2010-29/mkme