• Something wrong with this record ?

Cytokinové sítě u roztroušené sklerózy - absence klinické aplikace
[Cytokine networks in multiple sclerosis: lost in translation]

Laura Codarri, Adriano Fontana, Burkhard Becher

Language Czech Country Czech Republic

Document type Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review will discuss aspects of cytokine networks in neuroinflammatory diseases and attempt to provide some explanation for our failures and successes in translating preclinical data to benefit patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). We will discuss innate cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor alpha and interferon (IFN) beta and will then go on to cover recent findings on the role of interleukin-23 and the so-called T(H)17 cells and how they are implicated in the pathogenesis of neuroinflammation. RECENT FINDINGS: Even though IFN-beta has been used for the treatment of MS for many years, it is only recently that the mechanistic underpinnings of the IFN-beta-mediated immune modulation was discovered in preclinical models. The timeline is at odds with the idea that preclinical data should shape the design of therapeutic strategies in the clinic. Conversely, the discovery of the so-called T(H)17 cells and their association with neuroinflammation has broken the dogma that IFN-gamma-producing T(H)1 cells have the exclusive capacity to invade and destroy the central nervous system tissue. So why then did a clinical trial targeting the T(H)17-promoting cytokine interleukin-23 fail? SUMMARY: Preclinical studies using the animal models for MS have yielded promising results, but unfortunately the translation into the clinic is often disappointing. The reason for this may be the complex nature of the pathogenesis of autoimmune neuroinflammation, but more often an oversimplified interpretation of preclinical observations appears to hinder our progress.

Cytokine networks in multiple sclerosis: lost in translation

Bibliography, etc.

Lit.: 87

000      
00000naa 2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc10035860
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20111210200721.0
008      
110106s2010 xr e cze||
009      
AR
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a cze $b eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Codarri, Laura
245    10
$a Cytokinové sítě u roztroušené sklerózy - absence klinické aplikace / $c Laura Codarri, Adriano Fontana, Burkhard Becher
246    11
$a Cytokine networks in multiple sclerosis: lost in translation
314    __
$a Department of Pathology, Institute of Experimental Immunology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich
504    __
$a Lit.: 87
520    9_
$a PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review will discuss aspects of cytokine networks in neuroinflammatory diseases and attempt to provide some explanation for our failures and successes in translating preclinical data to benefit patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). We will discuss innate cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor alpha and interferon (IFN) beta and will then go on to cover recent findings on the role of interleukin-23 and the so-called T(H)17 cells and how they are implicated in the pathogenesis of neuroinflammation. RECENT FINDINGS: Even though IFN-beta has been used for the treatment of MS for many years, it is only recently that the mechanistic underpinnings of the IFN-beta-mediated immune modulation was discovered in preclinical models. The timeline is at odds with the idea that preclinical data should shape the design of therapeutic strategies in the clinic. Conversely, the discovery of the so-called T(H)17 cells and their association with neuroinflammation has broken the dogma that IFN-gamma-producing T(H)1 cells have the exclusive capacity to invade and destroy the central nervous system tissue. So why then did a clinical trial targeting the T(H)17-promoting cytokine interleukin-23 fail? SUMMARY: Preclinical studies using the animal models for MS have yielded promising results, but unfortunately the translation into the clinic is often disappointing. The reason for this may be the complex nature of the pathogenesis of autoimmune neuroinflammation, but more often an oversimplified interpretation of preclinical observations appears to hinder our progress.
650    _2
$a financování organizované $7 D005381
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a cytokiny $x genetika $x metabolismus $7 D016207
650    _2
$a demyelinizační autoimunitní nemoci CNS $x imunologie $x patofyziologie $x patologie $7 D020278
650    _2
$a modely nemocí na zvířatech $7 D004195
650    _2
$a preklinické hodnocení léčiv $x metody $x trendy $7 D004353
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a imunologické faktory $x farmakologie $x terapeutické užití $7 D007155
650    _2
$a zánět $x imunologie $x patofyziologie $x patologie $7 D007249
650    _2
$a roztroušená skleróza $x imunologie $x patofyziologie $x patologie $7 D009103
650    _2
$a T-lymfocyty pomocné-indukující $x imunologie $x účinky léků $7 D006377
650    _2
$a biomedicínský výzkum $x metody $x trendy $7 D035843
655    _2
$a přehledy $7 D016454
700    1_
$a Fontana, Adriano
700    1_
$a Becher, Burkhard
773    0_
$w MED00172591 $t Current opinion in neurology $g Roč. 1, č. 1 (2010), s. 17-22 $x 1804-5669
910    __
$a ABA008 $b B 2619 $c 608 a $y 7
990    __
$a 20110106080203 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20110106101245 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 824573 $s 689762
BAS    __
$a 3
BMC    __
$a 2010 $b 1 $c 1 $d 17-22 $m Current Opinion in Neurology (České vyd.) $x MED00172591
LZP    __
$a 2011-01/mkme

Find record