• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

PCI kmene levé věnčité tepny versus CABG: pětileté sledování ve dvou registrech

Park DW, et al.

Jazyk čeština Země Česko

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc11000483

OBJECTIVES: We performed the long-term follow-up of a large cohort of patients in a multicenter study receiving left main coronary artery (LMCA) revascularization. BACKGROUND: Limited information is available on long-term outcomes for patients with unprotected LMCA disease who underwent coronary stent procedure or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: We evaluated 2,240 patients with unprotected LMCA disease who received coronary stents (n = 1,102; 318 with bare-metal stents and 784 with drug-eluting stents) or underwent CABG (n = 1,138) between 2000 and 2006 and for whom complete follow-up data were available for at least 3 to 9 years (median 5.2 years). The 5-year adverse outcomes (death; a composite outcome of death, Q-wave myocardial infarction [MI], or stroke; and target vessel revascularization [TVR]) were compared with the use of the inverse probability of treatment weighted method and propensity-score matching. RESULTS: After adjustment for differences in baseline risk factors with the inverse probability of treatment weighting, the 5-year risk of death (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88 to 1.44, p = 0.35) and the combined risk of death, Q-wave MI, or stroke (HR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.84 to 1.37, p = 0.59) were not significantly different for patients undergoing stenting versus CABG. The risk of TVR was significantly higher in the stenting group than in the CABG group (HR: 5.11; 95% CI: 3.52 to 7.42, p < 0.001). Similar results were obtained in comparisons of bare-metal stent with concurrent CABG and of drug-eluting stent with concurrent CABG. In further analysis with propensity-score matching, overall findings were consistent. CONCLUSIONS: During 5-year follow-up, stenting showed similar rates of mortality and of the composite of death, Q-wave MI, or stroke but higher rates of TVR as compared with CABG for patients with unprotected LMCA disease.

Bibliografie atd.

Lit.: 2

000      
00000naa 2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc11000483
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20111210201451.0
008      
110203s2010 xr e cze||
009      
AR
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a cze $b eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Park, D. W.
245    10
$a PCI kmene levé věnčité tepny versus CABG: pětileté sledování ve dvou registrech / $c Park DW, et al.
314    __
$a Department of Cardiology, Center for Medical Research and Information, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
504    __
$a Lit.: 2
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVES: We performed the long-term follow-up of a large cohort of patients in a multicenter study receiving left main coronary artery (LMCA) revascularization. BACKGROUND: Limited information is available on long-term outcomes for patients with unprotected LMCA disease who underwent coronary stent procedure or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: We evaluated 2,240 patients with unprotected LMCA disease who received coronary stents (n = 1,102; 318 with bare-metal stents and 784 with drug-eluting stents) or underwent CABG (n = 1,138) between 2000 and 2006 and for whom complete follow-up data were available for at least 3 to 9 years (median 5.2 years). The 5-year adverse outcomes (death; a composite outcome of death, Q-wave myocardial infarction [MI], or stroke; and target vessel revascularization [TVR]) were compared with the use of the inverse probability of treatment weighted method and propensity-score matching. RESULTS: After adjustment for differences in baseline risk factors with the inverse probability of treatment weighting, the 5-year risk of death (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88 to 1.44, p = 0.35) and the combined risk of death, Q-wave MI, or stroke (HR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.84 to 1.37, p = 0.59) were not significantly different for patients undergoing stenting versus CABG. The risk of TVR was significantly higher in the stenting group than in the CABG group (HR: 5.11; 95% CI: 3.52 to 7.42, p < 0.001). Similar results were obtained in comparisons of bare-metal stent with concurrent CABG and of drug-eluting stent with concurrent CABG. In further analysis with propensity-score matching, overall findings were consistent. CONCLUSIONS: During 5-year follow-up, stenting showed similar rates of mortality and of the composite of death, Q-wave MI, or stroke but higher rates of TVR as compared with CABG for patients with unprotected LMCA disease.
650    _2
$a koronární bypass $7 D001026
650    _2
$a koronární nemoc $x mortalita $x terapie $7 D003327
650    _2
$a stenty uvolňující léky $7 D054855
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a následné studie $7 D005500
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a stenty $7 D015607
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
773    0_
$w MED00012706 $t Clinical cardiology alert $g Roč. 4, č. 5 (2010), s. 34-35 $x 1213-2586
787    18
$w bmc11000484 $i Recenze v: $t Komentář [k článku PCI kmene levé věnčité tepny versus CABG: pětileté sledování ve dvou registrech]
910    __
$a ABA008 $b B 2242 $c 407 a $y 7
990    __
$a 20110202063614 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20110228123019 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 827514 $s 692350
BAS    __
$a 3
BMC    __
$a 2010 $b 4 $c 5 $m Clinical Cardiology Alert $x MED00012706 $d 34-35
LZP    __
$a 2011-08/ipme

Najít záznam