-
Something wrong with this record ?
Segmental color Doppler myocardial imaging derived pre-ejection velocities are not clinically useful in the assessment of post-infarction scar transmurality
Tomáš Skála, Martin Hutyra, David Horák, Miloš Táborský
Language English Country Czech Republic
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2001
Free Medical Journals
from 1998
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2007-06-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2001
- MeSH
- Echocardiography, Doppler, Color MeSH
- Myocardial Infarction pathology ultrasonography MeSH
- Cicatrix etiology ultrasonography MeSH
- Myocardial Contraction MeSH
- Coronary Disease physiopathology ultrasonography MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging MeSH
- Myocardium pathology MeSH
- Observer Variation MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Sensitivity and Specificity MeSH
- Stroke Volume MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
Introduction. The presence of a velocity in isovolumic contraction phase (Vivc) evaluated using tissue Pulse wave Doppler myocardial imaging (PWDMI) correlates with a transmural extent of scar after myocardial infarction. The possible clinical usefulness of Vivc evaluated using color Doppler myocardial imaging (CDMI) in detection of a scar after myocardial infarction extent in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and low LV systolic function remains to be clarified. Patients and methods. 57 patients with CHD (average LVEF 33.5±5%), examined echocardiographicaly (17-segment LV model, 689 segments evaluated) and by cardiac magnetic resonance. All segments were scanned for Vivc presence using CDMI. Vivc presence/absence was correlated with signs of a scar after MI in all segments and in akinetic segments separately. Results. We found significantly larger values of wall thickness (8.2±2,2 vs. 7.1±1.9, p<0.0001), significantly lower values of average late enhancement (LE) extent (1.32±1.78 vs. 1.66±1.98, p=0.041) and LE/wall thickness ratio (20.1±29.8 vs. 29.6±36.7, p=0.008) in segments with present Vivc. Vivc presence in a segment with an abnormal wall motion had a sensitivity of 72.9% and a specificity of 35.7% in recognizing a segment without a transmural scar (LE/ wall thickness ratio ?75%). Vivc absence in a segment with an abnormal wall motion had a sensitivity of 72.7% and a specificity of 41.2% in recognizing a segment with a transmural scar (LE/wall thickness ratio ?75%). Conclusions. Isovolumic velocities evaluation assessed using color Doppler myocardial imaging is not applicable in a real-world clinical setting. The presence or absence of a velocity pattern during LV isovolumic contraction is not useful in in the assessment of a post-infarction scar transmurality.
References provided by Crossref.org
Lit.: 7
- 000
- 00000naa 2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc11000518
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20120605161150.0
- 008
- 110202s2010 xr e eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.5507/bp.2010.038 $2 doi
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Skála, Tomáš $7 xx0137536
- 245 10
- $a Segmental color Doppler myocardial imaging derived pre-ejection velocities are not clinically useful in the assessment of post-infarction scar transmurality / $c Tomáš Skála, Martin Hutyra, David Horák, Miloš Táborský
- 314 __
- $a 1st Department of Internal Medicine (Cardiology), University Hospital, Olomouc
- 504 __
- $a Lit.: 7
- 520 9_
- $a Introduction. The presence of a velocity in isovolumic contraction phase (Vivc) evaluated using tissue Pulse wave Doppler myocardial imaging (PWDMI) correlates with a transmural extent of scar after myocardial infarction. The possible clinical usefulness of Vivc evaluated using color Doppler myocardial imaging (CDMI) in detection of a scar after myocardial infarction extent in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and low LV systolic function remains to be clarified. Patients and methods. 57 patients with CHD (average LVEF 33.5±5%), examined echocardiographicaly (17-segment LV model, 689 segments evaluated) and by cardiac magnetic resonance. All segments were scanned for Vivc presence using CDMI. Vivc presence/absence was correlated with signs of a scar after MI in all segments and in akinetic segments separately. Results. We found significantly larger values of wall thickness (8.2±2,2 vs. 7.1±1.9, p<0.0001), significantly lower values of average late enhancement (LE) extent (1.32±1.78 vs. 1.66±1.98, p=0.041) and LE/wall thickness ratio (20.1±29.8 vs. 29.6±36.7, p=0.008) in segments with present Vivc. Vivc presence in a segment with an abnormal wall motion had a sensitivity of 72.9% and a specificity of 35.7% in recognizing a segment without a transmural scar (LE/ wall thickness ratio ?75%). Vivc absence in a segment with an abnormal wall motion had a sensitivity of 72.7% and a specificity of 41.2% in recognizing a segment with a transmural scar (LE/wall thickness ratio ?75%). Conclusions. Isovolumic velocities evaluation assessed using color Doppler myocardial imaging is not applicable in a real-world clinical setting. The presence or absence of a velocity pattern during LV isovolumic contraction is not useful in in the assessment of a post-infarction scar transmurality.
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a jizva $x etiologie $x ultrasonografie $7 D002921
- 650 _2
- $a koronární nemoc $x patofyziologie $x ultrasonografie $7 D003327
- 650 _2
- $a barevná dopplerovská echokardiografie $7 D018618
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $7 D008279
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a kontrakce myokardu $7 D009200
- 650 _2
- $a infarkt myokardu $x patologie $x ultrasonografie $7 D009203
- 650 _2
- $a myokard $x patologie $7 D009206
- 650 _2
- $a odchylka pozorovatele $7 D015588
- 650 _2
- $a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
- 650 _2
- $a tepový objem $7 D013318
- 700 1_
- $a Hutyra, Martin, $d 1974- $7 xx0013232
- 700 1_
- $a Horák, David, $d -2010 $7 stk2007383283
- 700 1_
- $a Táborský, Miloš, $d 1962- $7 jn20010310074
- 773 0_
- $w MED00012606 $t Biomedical papers $g Roč. 154, č. 3 (2010), s. 251-256 $x 1213-8118
- 856 41
- $u http://biomed.papers.upol.cz/pdfs/bio/2010/03/10.pdf $y plný text volně přístupný
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b A 1502 $c 958 $y 7
- 990 __
- $a 20110202081017 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20120605161117 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 827549 $s 692386
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BMC __
- $a 2010 $b 154 $c 3 $m Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacký, Olomouc Czech Republic $x MED00012606 $d 251-256
- LZP __
- $a 2011-08/ipme