Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

The Taguchi technique of the transplanted kidney ureter implantation - single centre experience

J Pacovsky, P Navratil

. 2007 ; 112 (1) : 61-66, 2007.

Jazyk angličtina Země Švédsko

Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc11004108

Taguchi technique of ureteral implantation was used in 22 kidney transplant patients (group T). Group T was compared with 25 patients who were treated using Lich-Gregoir technique (group LG). Immunosuppression, incidence of biopsy evidenced acute cellular rejection (ACR), haematuria rate and ureteral complications (stricture, reflux) were assessed in both groups. The immunosuppression used was based on cyclosporin A (63.6%), tacrolimus (27.3%) and sirolimus (8.1%) in T group. Cyclosporin A(72%), tacrolimus (20%) and sirolimus (8%) were used in LG group. No induction was used. The incidence of ACR was similar in both groups--T resp. LG was 50% resp. 52%. Haematuria after operation was on average 4.0 days in the T group and on average 3.1 in the LG group. Ureteral complications were observed in 18.2% of cases in T group and in 16% of cases in LG group. No reflux was evidenced in any group. Taguchi technique is fast and very easy to do. A slightly higher incidence of ureteralcomplications and a longer period of postoperative haematuria were observed in T group. Taguchi technique is very easily performed with a shorter operating time. We advocate it as a method of ureteral implantation on the thin-wall urinary bladder. The results were very good in these cases.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
02529naa 2200301 a 4500
001      
bmc11004108
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20121220110909.0
008      
110303s2007 sw e eng||
009      
AR
024    __
$a 10.3109/2000-1967-095 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)17578808
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sw
100    1_
$a Pacovský, Jaroslav $7 xx0087007
245    14
$a The Taguchi technique of the transplanted kidney ureter implantation - single centre experience / $c J Pacovsky, P Navratil
314    __
$a Department of Urology-Transplant Centre, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Charles University Prague, Czech Republic. japacovsky@post.cz
520    9_
$a Taguchi technique of ureteral implantation was used in 22 kidney transplant patients (group T). Group T was compared with 25 patients who were treated using Lich-Gregoir technique (group LG). Immunosuppression, incidence of biopsy evidenced acute cellular rejection (ACR), haematuria rate and ureteral complications (stricture, reflux) were assessed in both groups. The immunosuppression used was based on cyclosporin A (63.6%), tacrolimus (27.3%) and sirolimus (8.1%) in T group. Cyclosporin A(72%), tacrolimus (20%) and sirolimus (8%) were used in LG group. No induction was used. The incidence of ACR was similar in both groups--T resp. LG was 50% resp. 52%. Haematuria after operation was on average 4.0 days in the T group and on average 3.1 in the LG group. Ureteral complications were observed in 18.2% of cases in T group and in 16% of cases in LG group. No reflux was evidenced in any group. Taguchi technique is fast and very easy to do. A slightly higher incidence of ureteralcomplications and a longer period of postoperative haematuria were observed in T group. Taguchi technique is very easily performed with a shorter operating time. We advocate it as a method of ureteral implantation on the thin-wall urinary bladder. The results were very good in these cases.
650    _2
$a studie případů a kontrol $7 D016022
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a imunosupresiva $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D007166
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    _2
$a ureter $x transplantace $7 D014513
650    _2
$a urologické chirurgické výkony $x metody $x škodlivé účinky $7 D013520
655    _2
$a klinické zkoušky $7 D016430
700    1_
$a Navrátil, Pavel, $d 1951- $7 skuk0004272
773    0_
$t Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences $w MED00010722 $g Roč. 112, č. 1 (2007), s. 61-66, 2007
910    __
$a ABA008 $b x $y 1
990    __
$a 20110414092428 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20121220110953 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 831447 $s 696136
BAS    __
$a 3
BMC    __
$a 2007 $b 112 $c 1 $d 61-66, 2007 $m Upsala journal of medical sciences $n Ups J Med Sci $x MED00010722
LZP    __
$a 2011-3B/ipme

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé