-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Chronic diabetic macular oedema, pars plana vitrectomy or combination of PPV and laser?
S Synek, M Synkova
Jazyk angličtina Země Chorvatsko
Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, srovnávací studie
NLK
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2007-03-01 do 2017-03-31
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2006
- MeSH
- diabetická retinopatie chirurgie MeSH
- kombinovaná terapie MeSH
- laserová koagulace škodlivé účinky MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- makulární edém chirurgie MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- vitrektomie škodlivé účinky MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- zraková ostrost MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- klinické zkoušky MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
Diabetic cystoid macular oedema (DME) is a common cause of visual acuity (VA) decrease. Good anatomical results and VA of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) in cases of macular hole internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling leads to usage of this technique in DME. A favorable result even in a case without vitreoretinal traction leads to conclusion that pathogenesis of this disease is different. We analyzed retrospectively 20 eyes from 20 patients with DME that had undergone PPV and ILM peeling. Half of them were laser treated 6 months before surgery. All eyes had an attached posterior hyaloids membrane in the macular region, but without thickening and without traction. Median duration of DME at the time of PPV was 18 months (range 12-24 months). The median preoperative best-corrected VA of 0.4 (range 0.01-1.0), improved to a median postoperative VA of 0.55 (range 0.01-1.0). Ten eyes without preoperative laser coagulation had a median VA improvement of 77%, while 10 eyes with preoperative macular laser treatment had a median VA improvement of 14.8%. In all 20 eyes DME was no longer visible on microscopic examination after a median period of 3 months after PPV. PPV and ILM peeling resulted in the resolution of oedema, with an improvement in VA in the majority of cases. Eyes without preoperative macular photocoagulation had a significantly higher visual improvement than eyes with preoperative laser treatment. A randomized controlled prospective trial of PPV versus laser is needed to determine the role of PPV as a treatment modality for DME.
- 000
- 03016naa 2200397 a 4500
- 001
- bmc11006185
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20180314102558.0
- 008
- 110331s2008 ci e eng||
- 009
- AR
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ci
- 100 1_
- $a Synek, Svatopluk, $d 1951- $7 jn20000710634
- 245 10
- $a Chronic diabetic macular oedema, pars plana vitrectomy or combination of PPV and laser? / $c S Synek, M Synkova
- 314 __
- $a Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Medical Faculty, Masaryk University, Teaching Hospital St. Anne, Brno, Czech Republic. svatopluk.synek@fnusa.cz
- 520 9_
- $a Diabetic cystoid macular oedema (DME) is a common cause of visual acuity (VA) decrease. Good anatomical results and VA of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) in cases of macular hole internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling leads to usage of this technique in DME. A favorable result even in a case without vitreoretinal traction leads to conclusion that pathogenesis of this disease is different. We analyzed retrospectively 20 eyes from 20 patients with DME that had undergone PPV and ILM peeling. Half of them were laser treated 6 months before surgery. All eyes had an attached posterior hyaloids membrane in the macular region, but without thickening and without traction. Median duration of DME at the time of PPV was 18 months (range 12-24 months). The median preoperative best-corrected VA of 0.4 (range 0.01-1.0), improved to a median postoperative VA of 0.55 (range 0.01-1.0). Ten eyes without preoperative laser coagulation had a median VA improvement of 77%, while 10 eyes with preoperative macular laser treatment had a median VA improvement of 14.8%. In all 20 eyes DME was no longer visible on microscopic examination after a median period of 3 months after PPV. PPV and ILM peeling resulted in the resolution of oedema, with an improvement in VA in the majority of cases. Eyes without preoperative macular photocoagulation had a significantly higher visual improvement than eyes with preoperative laser treatment. A randomized controlled prospective trial of PPV versus laser is needed to determine the role of PPV as a treatment modality for DME.
- 590 __
- $a bohemika - dle Pubmed
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a kombinovaná terapie $7 D003131
- 650 _2
- $a diabetická retinopatie $x chirurgie $7 D003930
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a laserová koagulace $x škodlivé účinky $7 D017075
- 650 _2
- $a makulární edém $x chirurgie $7 D008269
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 _2
- $a zraková ostrost $7 D014792
- 650 _2
- $a vitrektomie $x škodlivé účinky $7 D014821
- 655 _2
- $a klinické zkoušky $7 D016430
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 700 1_
- $a Synková, Monika $7 xx0102253
- 773 0_
- $t Coll Antropol $w MED00180201 $g Roč. 32, Suppl 2 (2008), s. 11-14 $x 0350-6134
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b x $y 2 $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20110414100438 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20180314102608 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 833798 $s 698277
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BMC __
- $a 2008 $b 32 $c Suppl 2 $d 11-14 $i 0350-6134 $m Collegium antropologicum $n Coll Antropol $x MED00180201
- LZP __
- $a 2011-1B09/jt