Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Chronic diabetic macular oedema, pars plana vitrectomy or combination of PPV and laser?

S Synek, M Synkova

. 2008 ; 32 (Suppl 2) : 11-14.

Jazyk angličtina Země Chorvatsko

Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, srovnávací studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc11006185

Diabetic cystoid macular oedema (DME) is a common cause of visual acuity (VA) decrease. Good anatomical results and VA of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) in cases of macular hole internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling leads to usage of this technique in DME. A favorable result even in a case without vitreoretinal traction leads to conclusion that pathogenesis of this disease is different. We analyzed retrospectively 20 eyes from 20 patients with DME that had undergone PPV and ILM peeling. Half of them were laser treated 6 months before surgery. All eyes had an attached posterior hyaloids membrane in the macular region, but without thickening and without traction. Median duration of DME at the time of PPV was 18 months (range 12-24 months). The median preoperative best-corrected VA of 0.4 (range 0.01-1.0), improved to a median postoperative VA of 0.55 (range 0.01-1.0). Ten eyes without preoperative laser coagulation had a median VA improvement of 77%, while 10 eyes with preoperative macular laser treatment had a median VA improvement of 14.8%. In all 20 eyes DME was no longer visible on microscopic examination after a median period of 3 months after PPV. PPV and ILM peeling resulted in the resolution of oedema, with an improvement in VA in the majority of cases. Eyes without preoperative macular photocoagulation had a significantly higher visual improvement than eyes with preoperative laser treatment. A randomized controlled prospective trial of PPV versus laser is needed to determine the role of PPV as a treatment modality for DME.

000      
03016naa 2200397 a 4500
001      
bmc11006185
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20180314102558.0
008      
110331s2008 ci e eng||
009      
AR
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ci
100    1_
$a Synek, Svatopluk, $d 1951- $7 jn20000710634
245    10
$a Chronic diabetic macular oedema, pars plana vitrectomy or combination of PPV and laser? / $c S Synek, M Synkova
314    __
$a Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Medical Faculty, Masaryk University, Teaching Hospital St. Anne, Brno, Czech Republic. svatopluk.synek@fnusa.cz
520    9_
$a Diabetic cystoid macular oedema (DME) is a common cause of visual acuity (VA) decrease. Good anatomical results and VA of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) in cases of macular hole internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling leads to usage of this technique in DME. A favorable result even in a case without vitreoretinal traction leads to conclusion that pathogenesis of this disease is different. We analyzed retrospectively 20 eyes from 20 patients with DME that had undergone PPV and ILM peeling. Half of them were laser treated 6 months before surgery. All eyes had an attached posterior hyaloids membrane in the macular region, but without thickening and without traction. Median duration of DME at the time of PPV was 18 months (range 12-24 months). The median preoperative best-corrected VA of 0.4 (range 0.01-1.0), improved to a median postoperative VA of 0.55 (range 0.01-1.0). Ten eyes without preoperative laser coagulation had a median VA improvement of 77%, while 10 eyes with preoperative macular laser treatment had a median VA improvement of 14.8%. In all 20 eyes DME was no longer visible on microscopic examination after a median period of 3 months after PPV. PPV and ILM peeling resulted in the resolution of oedema, with an improvement in VA in the majority of cases. Eyes without preoperative macular photocoagulation had a significantly higher visual improvement than eyes with preoperative laser treatment. A randomized controlled prospective trial of PPV versus laser is needed to determine the role of PPV as a treatment modality for DME.
590    __
$a bohemika - dle Pubmed
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a kombinovaná terapie $7 D003131
650    _2
$a diabetická retinopatie $x chirurgie $7 D003930
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a laserová koagulace $x škodlivé účinky $7 D017075
650    _2
$a makulární edém $x chirurgie $7 D008269
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    _2
$a zraková ostrost $7 D014792
650    _2
$a vitrektomie $x škodlivé účinky $7 D014821
655    _2
$a klinické zkoušky $7 D016430
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
700    1_
$a Synková, Monika $7 xx0102253
773    0_
$t Coll Antropol $w MED00180201 $g Roč. 32, Suppl 2 (2008), s. 11-14 $x 0350-6134
910    __
$a ABA008 $b x $y 2 $z 0
990    __
$a 20110414100438 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20180314102608 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 833798 $s 698277
BAS    __
$a 3
BMC    __
$a 2008 $b 32 $c Suppl 2 $d 11-14 $i 0350-6134 $m Collegium antropologicum $n Coll Antropol $x MED00180201
LZP    __
$a 2011-1B09/jt

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...