Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Examination of specific DNA by PCR in patients with different forms of Lyme borreliosis

D. Picha, L. Moravcova, D. Holeckova, E. Zd'arsky, M. Valesova, V. Maresova, J. Hercogova, D. Vanousova

. 2008 ; 47 (10) : 1004-1010.

Language English Country United States

Document type Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Grant support
NR8263 MZ0 CEP Register
NR8293 MZ0 CEP Register

BACKGROUND: Borrelial specific DNA was examined in a group of 62 patients with different forms of Lyme borreliosis (LB) (32 patients suffered from neuroborreliosis, 19 manifested erythema migrans, and 11 joint involvement). METHODS: Nested-PCR system with five newly derived primers was used in parallel. The study was organized prospectively, the presence of DNA was tested for plasma, CSF, joint fluid and urine before treatment, and plasma, joint fluid and urine were examined after treatment. RESULTS: Before therapy, 36 patients (58.1%) were DNA positive on the whole; 21 positive patients (65.6%) were found in the group of neuroborreliosis, 8 (42.1%) showed signs of skin involvement, and 7 (63.6%) were positive in arthritis. After treatment, 11 patients (36.7%) were positive in neuroborreliosis, 3 (17.6%) in skin form, and 6 (54.5%) in joint form of LB. Among 97 positive amplifications the most frequent target was found in primer corresponding with 16S rDNA (50 samples, 51.5%). Lower but very similar results were obtained with primers for OspA (18 positive amplifications; 18.6%), OspC (13 positive amplifications; 13.4%), and flagellin (13 positive amplifications; 13.4%). There were 11 patients in whom only DNA and no specific antibodies were found. CONCLUSIONS: Specific DNA was found in all clinical groups of LB with similar sensitivity. Examination of the borrelial DNA in urine displayed the same sensitivity as in CSF and had a two times higher sensitivity than in plasma.

000      
01977naa 2200445 a 4500
001      
bmc11006313
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20131014101006.0
008      
110401s2008 xxu e eng||
009      
AR
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Pícha, Dušan, $d 1957- $7 skuk0004583
245    10
$a Examination of specific DNA by PCR in patients with different forms of Lyme borreliosis / $c D. Picha, L. Moravcova, D. Holeckova, E. Zd'arsky, M. Valesova, V. Maresova, J. Hercogova, D. Vanousova
314    __
$a Charles University, 2nd Medical School, 1st Clinic for Infectious Diseases, Teaching Hospital Bulovka, Prague, Czech Republic. dusan.picha@fnb.cz
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Borrelial specific DNA was examined in a group of 62 patients with different forms of Lyme borreliosis (LB) (32 patients suffered from neuroborreliosis, 19 manifested erythema migrans, and 11 joint involvement). METHODS: Nested-PCR system with five newly derived primers was used in parallel. The study was organized prospectively, the presence of DNA was tested for plasma, CSF, joint fluid and urine before treatment, and plasma, joint fluid and urine were examined after treatment. RESULTS: Before therapy, 36 patients (58.1%) were DNA positive on the whole; 21 positive patients (65.6%) were found in the group of neuroborreliosis, 8 (42.1%) showed signs of skin involvement, and 7 (63.6%) were positive in arthritis. After treatment, 11 patients (36.7%) were positive in neuroborreliosis, 3 (17.6%) in skin form, and 6 (54.5%) in joint form of LB. Among 97 positive amplifications the most frequent target was found in primer corresponding with 16S rDNA (50 samples, 51.5%). Lower but very similar results were obtained with primers for OspA (18 positive amplifications; 18.6%), OspC (13 positive amplifications; 13.4%), and flagellin (13 positive amplifications; 13.4%). There were 11 patients in whom only DNA and no specific antibodies were found. CONCLUSIONS: Specific DNA was found in all clinical groups of LB with similar sensitivity. Examination of the borrelial DNA in urine displayed the same sensitivity as in CSF and had a two times higher sensitivity than in plasma.
590    __
$a bohemika - dle Pubmed
650    _2
$a protilátky bakteriální $x analýza $7 D000907
650    _2
$a infekční artritida $x mikrobiologie $7 D001170
650    _2
$a Borrelia burgdorferi komplex $x genetika $7 D015748
650    _2
$a DNA primery $7 D017931
650    _2
$a DNA bakterií $x analýza $x genetika $7 D004269
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a lymeská nemoc $x genetika $x imunologie $7 D008193
650    _2
$a polymerázová řetězová reakce $7 D016133
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
650    _2
$a kůže $x mikrobiologie $7 D012867
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Moravcová, Lenka, $7 xx0110521 $d 1959-
700    1_
$a Holečková, Daniela $7 xx0110541
700    1_
$a Žďárský, Emanuel, $d 1957- $7 jn20000402981
700    1_
$a Valešová, Marie, $d 1950- $7 nlk19990073972
700    1_
$a Marešová, Vilma, $d 1943- $7 jn99240000677
700    1_
$a Třešňák Hercogová, Jana, $d 1959- $7 nlk19990073221
700    1#
$a Vanousová, Daniela. $7 _AN036759
773    0_
$t International Journal of Dermatology $w MED00009891 $g Roč. 47, č. 10 (2008), s. 1004-1010
910    __
$a ABA008 $b x $y 2 $z 0
990    __
$a 20110414103859 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20131014101532 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 833915 $s 698409
BAS    __
$a 3
BMC    __
$a 2008 $b 47 $c 10 $d 1004-1010 $m International journal of dermatology $n Int J Dermatol $x MED00009891
GRA    __
$a NR8263 $p MZ0
GRA    __
$a NR8293 $p MZ0
LZP    __
$a 2011-1B09/jjme

Find record