• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Non-HDL cholesterol a apolipoprotein B jsou rovnocenné ukazatele: kromě případů, kdy to neplatí!
[Non-HDL C equals apolipoprotein B: except when it does not!]

Allan Sniderman, Ken Williams, Jacqueline de Graaf

Jazyk čeština Země Česko

Typ dokumentu přehledy

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc11039386

Whether national guidelines should incorporate apolipoprotein B (apoB) into clinical practice is one of the most important and contentious decisions they must face. Canada has chosen to do so. What Europe and America decide remains to be seen. RECENT FINDINGS: Obviously, the results of the major epidemiological studies and clinical trials should be major drivers of decisions about guidelines. Such evidence clearly indicates that apoB is superior to LDL C as a marker of risk and an index of the adequacy of therapy but is mixed as to whether apoB is superior to non-HDL C. In this paper, we demonstrate that the issue is more complicated than it appears: that even if non-HDL C and apoB are equal predictors of vascular risk (which we do not believe is the case), this is not due to the VLDL C that is included in non-HDL C but rather reflects the fact that non-HDL C is a 'backwards' measure of apoB - that is, non-HDL C provides an indirect estimate of LDL particle number. Moreover, equal predictive power in groups does not mean that markers have equal predictive power in individuals. We also list multiple clinical circumstances when non-HDL C and apoB lead to different clinical decisions because the real test of markers is when they differ, not when they agree. SUMMARY: Thus, our conclusion is that apoB and non-HDL C are equal - except when they are not. Because apoB allows greater specificity of diagnosis and therapy, it re-establishes the primacy of individuals over groups as the objects of our study and our care and that may be its most important contribution to clinical lipidology. Dyslipidemias/physiopathology Dyslipidemias/therapy* Humans Hypolipidemic Agents/therapeutic use Individualized Medicine Lipid Metabolism Practice Guidelines as Topic Risk Factors Sensitivity and Specificity Substances Apolipoproteins B Biological Markers Cholesterol, HDL Cholesterol, LDL Cholesterol, VLDL Hypolipidemic Agents LinkOut - more resourcesFull Text Sources Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies, Inc. Swets Information Services Other Literature Sources Labome Researcher Resource - ExactAntigen/Labome

Non-HDL C equals apolipoprotein B: except when it does not!

Bibliografie atd.

Lit.: 17

000      
00000naa 2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc11039386
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20111210223331.0
008      
111107s2011 xr e cze||
009      
AR
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a cze $b eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Sniderman, Allan
245    10
$a Non-HDL cholesterol a apolipoprotein B jsou rovnocenné ukazatele: kromě případů, kdy to neplatí! / $c Allan Sniderman, Ken Williams, Jacqueline de Graaf
246    11
$a Non-HDL C equals apolipoprotein B: except when it does not!
314    __
$a Mike Rosenbloom Laboratory for Cardiovascular Research, Montreal, Quebec, Canada allansniderman@hotmail.com
504    __
$a Lit.: 17
520    9_
$a Whether national guidelines should incorporate apolipoprotein B (apoB) into clinical practice is one of the most important and contentious decisions they must face. Canada has chosen to do so. What Europe and America decide remains to be seen. RECENT FINDINGS: Obviously, the results of the major epidemiological studies and clinical trials should be major drivers of decisions about guidelines. Such evidence clearly indicates that apoB is superior to LDL C as a marker of risk and an index of the adequacy of therapy but is mixed as to whether apoB is superior to non-HDL C. In this paper, we demonstrate that the issue is more complicated than it appears: that even if non-HDL C and apoB are equal predictors of vascular risk (which we do not believe is the case), this is not due to the VLDL C that is included in non-HDL C but rather reflects the fact that non-HDL C is a 'backwards' measure of apoB - that is, non-HDL C provides an indirect estimate of LDL particle number. Moreover, equal predictive power in groups does not mean that markers have equal predictive power in individuals. We also list multiple clinical circumstances when non-HDL C and apoB lead to different clinical decisions because the real test of markers is when they differ, not when they agree. SUMMARY: Thus, our conclusion is that apoB and non-HDL C are equal - except when they are not. Because apoB allows greater specificity of diagnosis and therapy, it re-establishes the primacy of individuals over groups as the objects of our study and our care and that may be its most important contribution to clinical lipidology. Dyslipidemias/physiopathology Dyslipidemias/therapy* Humans Hypolipidemic Agents/therapeutic use Individualized Medicine Lipid Metabolism Practice Guidelines as Topic Risk Factors Sensitivity and Specificity Substances Apolipoproteins B Biological Markers Cholesterol, HDL Cholesterol, LDL Cholesterol, VLDL Hypolipidemic Agents LinkOut - more resourcesFull Text Sources Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies, Inc. Swets Information Services Other Literature Sources Labome Researcher Resource - ExactAntigen/Labome
650    _2
$a apolipoproteiny B $x krev $7 D001055
650    _2
$a biologické markery $x krev $7 D015415
650    _2
$a kardiovaskulární nemoci $x patofyziologie $x prevence a kontrola $x terapie $7 D002318
650    _2
$a HDL-cholesterol $x krev $7 D008076
650    _2
$a LDL-cholesterol $x krev $7 D008078
650    _2
$a VLDL-cholesterol $x krev $7 D015243
650    _2
$a klinické zkoušky jako téma $7 D002986
650    _2
$a diferenciální diagnóza $7 D003937
650    _2
$a dyslipidemie $x diagnóza $x patofyziologie $x terapie $7 D050171
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a hypolipidemika $x terapeutické užití $7 D000960
650    _2
$a individualizovaná medicína $7 D057285
650    _2
$a metabolismus lipidů $7 D050356
650    _2
$a směrnice pro lékařskou praxi jako téma $7 D017410
650    _2
$a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
650    _2
$a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
651    _2
$a Kanada $7 D002170
655    _2
$a přehledy $7 D016454
700    1_
$a Williams, Ken
700    1_
$a Graaf, Jacqueline de
773    0_
$w MED00156015 $t Current opinion in lipidology $g Roč. 5, č. 2 (2011), s. 43-49 $x 1802-372X
910    __
$a ABA008 $b B 2483 $c 129 $y 7
990    __
$a 20111107151429 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20111108121910 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 885546 $s 749699
BAS    __
$a 3
BMC    __
$a 2011 $b 5 $c 2 $d 43-49 $m Current Opinion in Lipidology $x MED00156015
LZP    __
$a 2011-22/mkme

Najít záznam