-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Non-HDL cholesterol a apolipoprotein B jsou rovnocenné ukazatele: kromě případů, kdy to neplatí!
[Non-HDL C equals apolipoprotein B: except when it does not!]
Allan Sniderman, Ken Williams, Jacqueline de Graaf
Jazyk čeština Země Česko
Typ dokumentu přehledy
- MeSH
- apolipoproteiny B krev MeSH
- biologické markery krev MeSH
- diferenciální diagnóza MeSH
- dyslipidemie diagnóza patofyziologie terapie MeSH
- HDL-cholesterol krev MeSH
- hypolipidemika terapeutické užití MeSH
- individualizovaná medicína MeSH
- kardiovaskulární nemoci patofyziologie prevence a kontrola terapie MeSH
- klinické zkoušky jako téma MeSH
- LDL-cholesterol krev MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- metabolismus lipidů MeSH
- rizikové faktory MeSH
- senzitivita a specificita MeSH
- směrnice pro lékařskou praxi jako téma MeSH
- VLDL-cholesterol krev MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- přehledy MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Kanada MeSH
Whether national guidelines should incorporate apolipoprotein B (apoB) into clinical practice is one of the most important and contentious decisions they must face. Canada has chosen to do so. What Europe and America decide remains to be seen. RECENT FINDINGS: Obviously, the results of the major epidemiological studies and clinical trials should be major drivers of decisions about guidelines. Such evidence clearly indicates that apoB is superior to LDL C as a marker of risk and an index of the adequacy of therapy but is mixed as to whether apoB is superior to non-HDL C. In this paper, we demonstrate that the issue is more complicated than it appears: that even if non-HDL C and apoB are equal predictors of vascular risk (which we do not believe is the case), this is not due to the VLDL C that is included in non-HDL C but rather reflects the fact that non-HDL C is a 'backwards' measure of apoB - that is, non-HDL C provides an indirect estimate of LDL particle number. Moreover, equal predictive power in groups does not mean that markers have equal predictive power in individuals. We also list multiple clinical circumstances when non-HDL C and apoB lead to different clinical decisions because the real test of markers is when they differ, not when they agree. SUMMARY: Thus, our conclusion is that apoB and non-HDL C are equal - except when they are not. Because apoB allows greater specificity of diagnosis and therapy, it re-establishes the primacy of individuals over groups as the objects of our study and our care and that may be its most important contribution to clinical lipidology. Dyslipidemias/physiopathology Dyslipidemias/therapy* Humans Hypolipidemic Agents/therapeutic use Individualized Medicine Lipid Metabolism Practice Guidelines as Topic Risk Factors Sensitivity and Specificity Substances Apolipoproteins B Biological Markers Cholesterol, HDL Cholesterol, LDL Cholesterol, VLDL Hypolipidemic Agents LinkOut - more resourcesFull Text Sources Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies, Inc. Swets Information Services Other Literature Sources Labome Researcher Resource - ExactAntigen/Labome
Non-HDL C equals apolipoprotein B: except when it does not!
Lit.: 17
- 000
- 00000naa 2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc11039386
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20111210223331.0
- 008
- 111107s2011 xr e cze||
- 009
- AR
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a cze $b eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Sniderman, Allan
- 245 10
- $a Non-HDL cholesterol a apolipoprotein B jsou rovnocenné ukazatele: kromě případů, kdy to neplatí! / $c Allan Sniderman, Ken Williams, Jacqueline de Graaf
- 246 11
- $a Non-HDL C equals apolipoprotein B: except when it does not!
- 314 __
- $a Mike Rosenbloom Laboratory for Cardiovascular Research, Montreal, Quebec, Canada allansniderman@hotmail.com
- 504 __
- $a Lit.: 17
- 520 9_
- $a Whether national guidelines should incorporate apolipoprotein B (apoB) into clinical practice is one of the most important and contentious decisions they must face. Canada has chosen to do so. What Europe and America decide remains to be seen. RECENT FINDINGS: Obviously, the results of the major epidemiological studies and clinical trials should be major drivers of decisions about guidelines. Such evidence clearly indicates that apoB is superior to LDL C as a marker of risk and an index of the adequacy of therapy but is mixed as to whether apoB is superior to non-HDL C. In this paper, we demonstrate that the issue is more complicated than it appears: that even if non-HDL C and apoB are equal predictors of vascular risk (which we do not believe is the case), this is not due to the VLDL C that is included in non-HDL C but rather reflects the fact that non-HDL C is a 'backwards' measure of apoB - that is, non-HDL C provides an indirect estimate of LDL particle number. Moreover, equal predictive power in groups does not mean that markers have equal predictive power in individuals. We also list multiple clinical circumstances when non-HDL C and apoB lead to different clinical decisions because the real test of markers is when they differ, not when they agree. SUMMARY: Thus, our conclusion is that apoB and non-HDL C are equal - except when they are not. Because apoB allows greater specificity of diagnosis and therapy, it re-establishes the primacy of individuals over groups as the objects of our study and our care and that may be its most important contribution to clinical lipidology. Dyslipidemias/physiopathology Dyslipidemias/therapy* Humans Hypolipidemic Agents/therapeutic use Individualized Medicine Lipid Metabolism Practice Guidelines as Topic Risk Factors Sensitivity and Specificity Substances Apolipoproteins B Biological Markers Cholesterol, HDL Cholesterol, LDL Cholesterol, VLDL Hypolipidemic Agents LinkOut - more resourcesFull Text Sources Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies, Inc. Swets Information Services Other Literature Sources Labome Researcher Resource - ExactAntigen/Labome
- 650 _2
- $a apolipoproteiny B $x krev $7 D001055
- 650 _2
- $a biologické markery $x krev $7 D015415
- 650 _2
- $a kardiovaskulární nemoci $x patofyziologie $x prevence a kontrola $x terapie $7 D002318
- 650 _2
- $a HDL-cholesterol $x krev $7 D008076
- 650 _2
- $a LDL-cholesterol $x krev $7 D008078
- 650 _2
- $a VLDL-cholesterol $x krev $7 D015243
- 650 _2
- $a klinické zkoušky jako téma $7 D002986
- 650 _2
- $a diferenciální diagnóza $7 D003937
- 650 _2
- $a dyslipidemie $x diagnóza $x patofyziologie $x terapie $7 D050171
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a hypolipidemika $x terapeutické užití $7 D000960
- 650 _2
- $a individualizovaná medicína $7 D057285
- 650 _2
- $a metabolismus lipidů $7 D050356
- 650 _2
- $a směrnice pro lékařskou praxi jako téma $7 D017410
- 650 _2
- $a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
- 650 _2
- $a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
- 651 _2
- $a Kanada $7 D002170
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Williams, Ken
- 700 1_
- $a Graaf, Jacqueline de
- 773 0_
- $w MED00156015 $t Current opinion in lipidology $g Roč. 5, č. 2 (2011), s. 43-49 $x 1802-372X
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b B 2483 $c 129 $y 7
- 990 __
- $a 20111107151429 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20111108121910 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 885546 $s 749699
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BMC __
- $a 2011 $b 5 $c 2 $d 43-49 $m Current Opinion in Lipidology $x MED00156015
- LZP __
- $a 2011-22/mkme