-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Tekutinová resuscitace pacientů s polytraumaty
[Fluid resuscitation in multiple trauma patients]
Christian Ertmer, Tim Kampmeier, Sebastian Rehberg, Matthias Lange
Jazyk čeština Země Česko
Typ dokumentu přehledy
- MeSH
- hemoragický šok farmakoterapie patofyziologie terapie MeSH
- hypertonické roztoky terapeutické užití MeSH
- isotonické roztoky terapeutické užití MeSH
- koloidy terapeutické užití MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- náhražky plazmy terapeutické užití MeSH
- polytrauma patofyziologie terapie MeSH
- poranění mozku terapie MeSH
- resuscitace metody MeSH
- tekutinová terapie MeSH
- urgentní zdravotnické služby MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- přehledy MeSH
Fluid resuscitation in trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock is controversially discussed in the literature. The coincidence of brain injury complicates management of these patients. This article summarizes the current knowledge on nonblood component fluid resuscitation and choice of fluids in patients with multiple trauma. RECENT FINDINGS: Whereas current evidence suggests the efficacy of fluid therapy in hemorrhagic shock without active bleeding, experimental and clinical data demonstrate that aggressive volume challenge may be futile or even deleterious in the setting of uncontrolled hemorrhage. Large amounts of isotonic crystalloids may be associated with hypothermia, acidosis and inflammation. In patients with traumatic brain injury hypertonic solutions may positively influence inflammation and intracranial pressure without affecting neurologic outcome or mortality. SUMMARY: To date no large-scale clinical studies exist to either support or refute the use of nonblood component fluid resuscitation of hemorrhagic shock in trauma patients. The optimal choice of fluid remains to be determined, but existing evidence suggests avoiding crystalloids in favor of hypertonic solutions. The role of modern, iso-oncotic colloids in the treatment of hemorrhagic shock has not yet been sufficiently defined. In patients with concomitant brain injury, arterial hypotension must be avoided and infusion of hypotonic solutions is obsolete, whereas administration of hypertonic solutions may exert beneficial effects beyond hemodynamic stabilization.
Fluid resuscitation in multiple trauma patients
Lit.: 68
- 000
- 00000naa 2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc11039407
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20111210223334.0
- 008
- 111108s2011 xr e cze||
- 009
- AR
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a cze $b eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Ertmer, Christian
- 245 10
- $a Tekutinová resuscitace pacientů s polytraumaty / $c Christian Ertmer, Tim Kampmeier, Sebastian Rehberg, Matthias Lange
- 246 11
- $a Fluid resuscitation in multiple trauma patients
- 314 __
- $a Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany
- 504 __
- $a Lit.: 68
- 520 9_
- $a Fluid resuscitation in trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock is controversially discussed in the literature. The coincidence of brain injury complicates management of these patients. This article summarizes the current knowledge on nonblood component fluid resuscitation and choice of fluids in patients with multiple trauma. RECENT FINDINGS: Whereas current evidence suggests the efficacy of fluid therapy in hemorrhagic shock without active bleeding, experimental and clinical data demonstrate that aggressive volume challenge may be futile or even deleterious in the setting of uncontrolled hemorrhage. Large amounts of isotonic crystalloids may be associated with hypothermia, acidosis and inflammation. In patients with traumatic brain injury hypertonic solutions may positively influence inflammation and intracranial pressure without affecting neurologic outcome or mortality. SUMMARY: To date no large-scale clinical studies exist to either support or refute the use of nonblood component fluid resuscitation of hemorrhagic shock in trauma patients. The optimal choice of fluid remains to be determined, but existing evidence suggests avoiding crystalloids in favor of hypertonic solutions. The role of modern, iso-oncotic colloids in the treatment of hemorrhagic shock has not yet been sufficiently defined. In patients with concomitant brain injury, arterial hypotension must be avoided and infusion of hypotonic solutions is obsolete, whereas administration of hypertonic solutions may exert beneficial effects beyond hemodynamic stabilization.
- 650 _2
- $a poranění mozku $x terapie $7 D001930
- 650 _2
- $a koloidy $x terapeutické užití $7 D003102
- 650 _2
- $a urgentní zdravotnické služby $7 D004632
- 650 _2
- $a tekutinová terapie $7 D005440
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a hypertonické roztoky $x terapeutické užití $7 D006982
- 650 _2
- $a isotonické roztoky $x terapeutické užití $7 D007552
- 650 _2
- $a polytrauma $x patofyziologie $x terapie $7 D009104
- 650 _2
- $a náhražky plazmy $x terapeutické užití $7 D010952
- 650 _2
- $a resuscitace $x metody $7 D012151
- 650 _2
- $a hemoragický šok $x farmakoterapie $x patofyziologie $x terapie $7 D012771
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Kampmeier, Tim
- 700 1_
- $a Rehberg, Sebastian
- 700 1_
- $a Lange, Matthias
- 773 0_
- $w MED00169418 $t Current opinion in anesthesiology $g Roč. 2, č. 2 (2011), s. 30-36 $x 1804-204X
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b B 2620 $c 24 $y 7
- 990 __
- $a 20111108085418 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20111108091245 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 885570 $s 749723
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BMC __
- $a 2011 $b 2 $c 2 $d 30-36 $m Current Opinion in Anesthesiology $x MED00169418
- LZP __
- $a 2011-22/mkme