Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Přední mezitělová spondylodéza krční páteře klecí Zero-P (Prospektivní studie - radiologické výsledky s minimálně ročním sledováním)
[Anterior interbody fusion of the cervical spine with a zero-p spacer: radiographic results with a minimum follow-up of one year in a prospective study]

Vaněk P, Bradáč O, Saur K.

. 2011 ; 78 (6) : 562-567.

Language Czech Country Czech Republic

Digital library NLK
Source

E-resources Online

NLK Free Medical Journals from 2006

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of anterior cervical microdiscectomy and fusion carried out using a newly designed interbody spacer with that of a standard cage plate construct in patients with symptomatic cervical spine spodylosis. The comparison was based on radiographic results and fusion rates. MATERIAL: A total number of 113 consecutive patients were enrolled in this prospective study between October 2008 and July 2009. Mono- or bisegmental spondylosis was diagnosed in the patients in whom conservative treatment of cervicobrachial symptoms had had no effect. Patients with myelopathy were not included.. METHODS: All patients underwent standard anterior microdiscectomy (at one or two levels). The novel anchored spacer Zero-P was used in 61 patients (group 1) and, in 52 patients, stabilisation was done using the interbody spacer Cornerstone and dynamic plate Premier (group 2). Lateral radiographic views of the cervical spine were obtained before surgery and at 6 weeks, and then at 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery. During follow-up, the cervical spine sagittal alignment (CobbC), segmental angle of the treated levels (CobbS), amount of segmental collapse and fusion rates were measured. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in CobbC between the two groups during follow- up (p < 0.051). A significant difference in the first two values of CobbS was found (p < 0.001), but next changes in CobbS were without any difference in either group. The mean degree of interspace collapse was without any significant difference between the groups. The fusion rate was significantly higher in group 1 than group 2 nine months after surgery (p = 0.032), but was the same in both groups at 12 months after surgery (p = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: The anchored spacer Zero-P provides biomechanical stability for the cervical spine similar to the cage and dynamic plate construct. Efforts to improve the cervical stand-alone anterior fusion device and to eliminate disadvantages of plate systems should be studied in larger patient groups with longer follow-ups. Key words: cervical spine, interbody fusion, fusion rate, radiology, stand-alone implant, Zero-P.

Anterior interbody fusion of the cervical spine with a zero-p spacer: radiographic results with a minimum follow-up of one year in a prospective study

Obsahuje 1 tabulku

Bibliography, etc.

Literatura

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc12004335
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20120313151051.0
007      
ta
008      
120210s2011 xr fdo f 000 0cze||
009      
AR
024    7_
$2 doi $a 10.55095/achot2011/089
040    __
$a ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2 $b cze
041    0_
$a cze $b eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Vaněk, Petr, $d 1972- $7 nlk20020123492 $u Neurochirurgická klinika, Ústřední vojenská nemocnice Praha
245    10
$a Přední mezitělová spondylodéza krční páteře klecí Zero-P (Prospektivní studie - radiologické výsledky s minimálně ročním sledováním) / $c Vaněk P, Bradáč O, Saur K.
246    31
$a Anterior interbody fusion of the cervical spine with a zero-p spacer: radiographic results with a minimum follow-up of one year in a prospective study
500    __
$a Obsahuje 1 tabulku
504    __
$a Literatura $b 27
520    9_
$a The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of anterior cervical microdiscectomy and fusion carried out using a newly designed interbody spacer with that of a standard cage plate construct in patients with symptomatic cervical spine spodylosis. The comparison was based on radiographic results and fusion rates. MATERIAL: A total number of 113 consecutive patients were enrolled in this prospective study between October 2008 and July 2009. Mono- or bisegmental spondylosis was diagnosed in the patients in whom conservative treatment of cervicobrachial symptoms had had no effect. Patients with myelopathy were not included.. METHODS: All patients underwent standard anterior microdiscectomy (at one or two levels). The novel anchored spacer Zero-P was used in 61 patients (group 1) and, in 52 patients, stabilisation was done using the interbody spacer Cornerstone and dynamic plate Premier (group 2). Lateral radiographic views of the cervical spine were obtained before surgery and at 6 weeks, and then at 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery. During follow-up, the cervical spine sagittal alignment (CobbC), segmental angle of the treated levels (CobbS), amount of segmental collapse and fusion rates were measured. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in CobbC between the two groups during follow- up (p < 0.051). A significant difference in the first two values of CobbS was found (p < 0.001), but next changes in CobbS were without any difference in either group. The mean degree of interspace collapse was without any significant difference between the groups. The fusion rate was significantly higher in group 1 than group 2 nine months after surgery (p = 0.032), but was the same in both groups at 12 months after surgery (p = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: The anchored spacer Zero-P provides biomechanical stability for the cervical spine similar to the cage and dynamic plate construct. Efforts to improve the cervical stand-alone anterior fusion device and to eliminate disadvantages of plate systems should be studied in larger patient groups with longer follow-ups. Key words: cervical spine, interbody fusion, fusion rate, radiology, stand-alone implant, Zero-P.
650    _2
$a nemoci páteře $x chirurgie $x patologie $x radiografie $7 D013122
650    _2
$a krční obratle $x chirurgie $x patologie $x radiografie $7 D002574
650    _2
$a meziobratlová ploténka $x chirurgie $x patologie $x radiografie $7 D007403
650    _2
$a fúze páteře $x metody $x přístrojové vybavení $x škodlivé účinky $7 D013123
650    _2
$a komprese míchy $7 D013117
650    _2
$a statistika jako téma $7 D013223
650    _2
$a interpretace statistických dat $7 D003627
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    _2
$a výsledky a postupy - zhodnocení (zdravotní péče) $7 D010043
650    _2
$a pooperační komplikace $7 D011183
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a interní fixátory $7 D016268
650    _2
$a protézy a implantáty $7 D019736
650    _2
$a biomechanika $7 D001696
700    1_
$a Bradáč, Ondřej $7 xx0121581 $u Neurochirurgická klinika, Ústřední vojenská nemocnice Praha
700    1_
$a Saur, Karel, $d 1976- $7 nlk20020123490 $u Neurochirurgická klinika, Ústřední vojenská nemocnice Praha
773    0_
$t Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae čechoslovaca $x 0001-5415 $g Roč. 78, č. 6 (2011), s. 562-567 $w MED00011021
910    __
$a ABA008 $b A 8 $c 507 $y 2
990    __
$a 20120209145703 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20120313151024 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 897248 $s 761124
BAS    __
$a 3
BMC    __
$a 2011 $b 78 $c 6 $d 562-567 $i 0001-5415 $m Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca $n Acta chir. orthop. traumatol. Čechoslovaca $x MED00011021
LZP    __
$a 2012-03/mkrk

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...