-
Something wrong with this record ?
Polypropylene mesh repair of incisional hernia after kidney transplantation: single-center experience and review of the literature
M. Varga, I. Matia, M. Kucera, M. Oliverius, M. Adamec
Language English Country Poland
Document type Journal Article, Review
PubMed
21959519
DOI
10.12659/aot.882004
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Surgical Mesh MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Herniorrhaphy methods MeSH
- Polypropylenes MeSH
- Postoperative Complications etiology surgery MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Risk Factors MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Kidney Transplantation adverse effects MeSH
- Hernia, Ventral etiology surgery MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Review MeSH
BACKGROUND: Incisional hernia after kidney transplantation increases patient morbidity and impacts quality of life. Reports of hernia mesh repair after kidney transplantation are rare; thus, the benefit of mesh hernioplasty in transplanted patients is assumed. However, it is also assumed that transplant patients are susceptible to incisional and mesh infections. MATERIAL/METHODS: Between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2010, we performed 1067 kidney transplantations. Twenty-eight patients developed incisional hernias (2.6%), and mesh repair was performed in 20 of them (8 women, 12 men; median age 59.5 years, range 43 to 68 years). We retrospectively studied this latter group. We also reviewed the literature regarding the results of this treatment. RESULTS: Postoperative mortality was zero, but postoperative wound bleeding led to surgical revision in 1 patient. Wound infection did not occur. During the follow-up period we observed 4 hernia recurrences (20%). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, our retrospective study and review of the literature confirmed the safety and low incidence (1.1% to 3.8%) of mesh hernia repair in chronic immunosuppressed patients after renal transplantation, which has a minimal risk of wound infection and no higher risk of hernia recurrence than in non-transplant patients.
Transplant Surgery Department Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine Prague Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12022096
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20150827144604.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 120806s2011 pl f 000 0#eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.12659/aot.882004 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)21959519
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a pl
- 100 1_
- $a Varga, Martin $7 xx0143533 $u Transplant Surgery Department, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Polypropylene mesh repair of incisional hernia after kidney transplantation: single-center experience and review of the literature / $c M. Varga, I. Matia, M. Kucera, M. Oliverius, M. Adamec
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Incisional hernia after kidney transplantation increases patient morbidity and impacts quality of life. Reports of hernia mesh repair after kidney transplantation are rare; thus, the benefit of mesh hernioplasty in transplanted patients is assumed. However, it is also assumed that transplant patients are susceptible to incisional and mesh infections. MATERIAL/METHODS: Between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2010, we performed 1067 kidney transplantations. Twenty-eight patients developed incisional hernias (2.6%), and mesh repair was performed in 20 of them (8 women, 12 men; median age 59.5 years, range 43 to 68 years). We retrospectively studied this latter group. We also reviewed the literature regarding the results of this treatment. RESULTS: Postoperative mortality was zero, but postoperative wound bleeding led to surgical revision in 1 patient. Wound infection did not occur. During the follow-up period we observed 4 hernia recurrences (20%). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, our retrospective study and review of the literature confirmed the safety and low incidence (1.1% to 3.8%) of mesh hernia repair in chronic immunosuppressed patients after renal transplantation, which has a minimal risk of wound infection and no higher risk of hernia recurrence than in non-transplant patients.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a ventrální hernie $x etiologie $x chirurgie $7 D006555
- 650 _2
- $a operace kýly $x metody $7 D059685
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a transplantace ledvin $x škodlivé účinky $7 D016030
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a polypropyleny $7 D011126
- 650 _2
- $a pooperační komplikace $x etiologie $x chirurgie $7 D011183
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 _2
- $a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
- 650 _2
- $a chirurgické síťky $7 D013526
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Matia, Ivan $7 xx0084014
- 700 1_
- $a Kučera, Miloš $7 xx0103987
- 700 1_
- $a Oliverius, Martin $7 xx0106430
- 700 1_
- $a Adamec, Miloš, $d 1959- $7 nlk20000083689
- 773 0_
- $w MED00000447 $t Annals of transplantation quarterly of the Polish Transplantation Society $x 1425-9524 $g Roč. 16, č. 3 (2011), s. 121-125
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21959519 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20120806 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20150827144719 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 944009 $s 779393
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2011 $b 16 $c 3 $d 121-125 $i 1425-9524 $m Annals of Transplantation $n Ann Transplant $x MED00000447
- LZP __
- $b NLK111 $a Pubmed-20120806/12/01