-
Something wrong with this record ?
A high ankle-brachial index is associated with increased aortic pulse wave velocity: the Czech post-MONICA study
P. Wohlfahrt, D. Palous, M. Ingrischová, A. Krajcoviechová, J. Seidlerová, M. Galovcová, J. Bruthans, M. Jozífová, V. Adámková, J. Filipovsky, R. Cífková
Language English Country Great Britain
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Grant support
NR9389
MZ0
CEP Register
- MeSH
- Analysis of Variance MeSH
- Aorta physiopathology ultrasonography MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Risk Assessment MeSH
- Cardiovascular Diseases diagnosis etiology physiopathology ultrasonography MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Logistic Models MeSH
- Compliance MeSH
- Predictive Value of Tests MeSH
- Pulsatile Flow MeSH
- Risk Factors MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Ankle Brachial Index MeSH
- Ultrasonography, Doppler MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Geographicals
- Czech Republic MeSH
BACKGROUND: Ankle brachial index (ABI) has been increasingly used in general practice to identify individuals with low ABI at high cardiovascular risk. However, there has been no consensus on the clinical significance of high ABI. The aim of our study was to compare aortic stiffness as a marker of cardiovascular risk in individuals with low (<1.0), normal (1.0-1.4), and high ABI (>1.4). METHODS: A total of 911 individuals from the Czech post-MONICA study (a randomly selected 1% representative population sample, aged 54 ± 13.5 years, 47% of men) were examined. ABI was measured using a handheld Doppler and aortic pulse wave velocity (aPWV) using the Sphygmocor device. RESULTS: Of the 911 individuals, 28 (3.1%) had low ABI and 23 (2.5%) high ABI. There was a U-shaped association between aPWV and ABI. aPWV was significantly higher in individuals with low and high ABI compared with the normal ABI group (11.1 ± 2.8, 8.3 ± 2.3, p < 0.001; 10.8 ± 2.5, 8.3 ± 2.3 m/s, p < 0.001, respectively). In a model adjusted for age, sex, systolic, diastolic, mean blood pressure and examiner, aPWV remained increased in both extreme ABI groups compared with the normal ABI group. In logistic regression analysis, aPWV together with glucose level, male sex, and a history of deep venous thrombosis were independent predictors of high ABI, while cholesterol was not. CONCLUSION: This is the first study showing increased aortic stiffness in individuals with high ABI, presumably responsible for increased left ventricular mass described previously in this group. These findings suggest increased cardiovascular risk of high ABI individuals.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12022256
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20160323110648.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 120806s2011 xxk f 000 0#eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1177/1741826711398840 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)21450589
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Wohlfahrt, Peter. $7 xx0230851 $u Department of Preventive Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
- 245 12
- $a A high ankle-brachial index is associated with increased aortic pulse wave velocity: the Czech post-MONICA study / $c P. Wohlfahrt, D. Palous, M. Ingrischová, A. Krajcoviechová, J. Seidlerová, M. Galovcová, J. Bruthans, M. Jozífová, V. Adámková, J. Filipovsky, R. Cífková
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Ankle brachial index (ABI) has been increasingly used in general practice to identify individuals with low ABI at high cardiovascular risk. However, there has been no consensus on the clinical significance of high ABI. The aim of our study was to compare aortic stiffness as a marker of cardiovascular risk in individuals with low (<1.0), normal (1.0-1.4), and high ABI (>1.4). METHODS: A total of 911 individuals from the Czech post-MONICA study (a randomly selected 1% representative population sample, aged 54 ± 13.5 years, 47% of men) were examined. ABI was measured using a handheld Doppler and aortic pulse wave velocity (aPWV) using the Sphygmocor device. RESULTS: Of the 911 individuals, 28 (3.1%) had low ABI and 23 (2.5%) high ABI. There was a U-shaped association between aPWV and ABI. aPWV was significantly higher in individuals with low and high ABI compared with the normal ABI group (11.1 ± 2.8, 8.3 ± 2.3, p < 0.001; 10.8 ± 2.5, 8.3 ± 2.3 m/s, p < 0.001, respectively). In a model adjusted for age, sex, systolic, diastolic, mean blood pressure and examiner, aPWV remained increased in both extreme ABI groups compared with the normal ABI group. In logistic regression analysis, aPWV together with glucose level, male sex, and a history of deep venous thrombosis were independent predictors of high ABI, while cholesterol was not. CONCLUSION: This is the first study showing increased aortic stiffness in individuals with high ABI, presumably responsible for increased left ventricular mass described previously in this group. These findings suggest increased cardiovascular risk of high ABI individuals.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a analýza rozptylu $7 D000704
- 650 _2
- $a tlakový index kotník-paže $7 D055109
- 650 _2
- $a aorta $x patofyziologie $x ultrasonografie $7 D001011
- 650 _2
- $a kardiovaskulární nemoci $x diagnóza $x etiologie $x patofyziologie $x ultrasonografie $7 D002318
- 650 _2
- $a poddajnost $7 D003187
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a logistické modely $7 D016015
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a prediktivní hodnota testů $7 D011237
- 650 _2
- $a pulzatilní průtok $7 D011673
- 650 _2
- $a hodnocení rizik $7 D018570
- 650 _2
- $a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
- 650 _2
- $a ultrasonografie dopplerovská $7 D018608
- 651 _2
- $a Česká republika $7 D018153
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Palouš, Daniel $7 xx0089381 $u Department of Preventive Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Ingrischová, Michaela $7 xx0118940 $u 2nd Medical Department, Cardiology and Angiology, 1st Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Krajčoviechová, Alena $7 xx0095262 $u Department of Preventive Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Mlíková Seidlerová, Jitka, $d 1977- $7 xx0096735 $u 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Charles University, Medical Faculty, Pilsen, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Galovcová, Markéta, $d 1974- $7 xx0156655 $u Department of Preventive Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Bruthans, Jan, $d 1948- $7 jn20000810219 $u Department of Preventive Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Jozífová, Marie $7 xx0101783 $u Department of Preventive Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Adámková, Věra, $d 1954- $7 jx20050329003 $u Department of Preventive Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Filipovský, Jan, $d 1958- $7 xx0058293 $u 2nd Medical Department, Cardiology and Angiology, 1st Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Cífková, Renata, $d 1955- $7 nlk20010094490 $u Department of Preventive Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00158635 $t European journal of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation official journal of the European Society of Cardiology, Working Groups on Epidemiology & Prevention and Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology $x 1741-8275 $g Roč. 18, č. 6 (2011), s. 790-796
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21450589 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20120806 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20160323110716 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 944169 $s 779553
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2011 $b 18 $c 6 $d 790-796 $e 20110301 $i 1741-8275 $m European journal of cardiovascular prevention & rehabilitation $n Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil $x MED00158635
- GRA __
- $a NR9389 $p MZ0
- LZP __
- $b NLK111 $a Pubmed-20120806/12/01