• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Influence of anesthesia on the results of intraoperative diagnostic electromyostimulation in patients with anorectal malformation

V. Mixa, R. Skába, J. Kraus, K. Cvachovec,

. 2011 ; 46 (11) : 2135-9.

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc12024290

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Stimulation electromyography (sEMG) is useful in identifying the sphincter muscle (M) in patients with anorectal malformations (ARMs). This study evaluates the effect of anesthetic agents and M relaxants on sEMG findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventeen infants (10 boys and 7 girls) with a mean age of 6.3 months and mean body weight of 6.7 kg were included in a prospective randomized study. Anesthesia was induced by sevoflurane and opioids, and an epidural catheter was inserted caudally. Stimulation electromyography of levator ani M using 14 mA current was used, and latency and amplitude of the evoked compound M action potential (CMAP) were recorded. Patients were randomized into 2 groups. Group A received a local anesthetic epidurally, and sEMG was performed. Administration of the M relaxant and measurement of M response followed. In group B drug administration, sEMG and response measurement were performed after administration of M relaxant. RESULTS: Baseline CMAP was recorded in all patients. Average latency was 4.1 milliseconds, and average amplitude was 0.43 mV. In group A, the average latency was 4.0 milliseconds, and average amplitude was 0.65 mV. After administration of the M relaxant, the CMAP disappeared. In group B, no CMAP was observed immediately after administration of the M relaxant. CONCLUSION: Administration of the inhalational anesthetic, opioids, and local anesthetic did not influence the M response of M fibers in the levator ani M on sEMG and enables its localization during ARM reconstruction. Nondepolarizing M relaxation completely abolished the response. If M relaxant is necessary, cisatracurium is used. The most suitable method of anesthesia for ARM surgery appears to be inhalational anesthesia supplemented by opioids and epidural analgesia.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc12024290
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20121210093044.0
007      
ta
008      
120815s2011 xxu f 000 0#eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.07.021 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)22075345
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Mixa, Vladimír $u Department of Anesthesiology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol Hospital, 150 06 Prague, Czech Republic. vmxa@volny.cz
245    10
$a Influence of anesthesia on the results of intraoperative diagnostic electromyostimulation in patients with anorectal malformation / $c V. Mixa, R. Skába, J. Kraus, K. Cvachovec,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Stimulation electromyography (sEMG) is useful in identifying the sphincter muscle (M) in patients with anorectal malformations (ARMs). This study evaluates the effect of anesthetic agents and M relaxants on sEMG findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventeen infants (10 boys and 7 girls) with a mean age of 6.3 months and mean body weight of 6.7 kg were included in a prospective randomized study. Anesthesia was induced by sevoflurane and opioids, and an epidural catheter was inserted caudally. Stimulation electromyography of levator ani M using 14 mA current was used, and latency and amplitude of the evoked compound M action potential (CMAP) were recorded. Patients were randomized into 2 groups. Group A received a local anesthetic epidurally, and sEMG was performed. Administration of the M relaxant and measurement of M response followed. In group B drug administration, sEMG and response measurement were performed after administration of M relaxant. RESULTS: Baseline CMAP was recorded in all patients. Average latency was 4.1 milliseconds, and average amplitude was 0.43 mV. In group A, the average latency was 4.0 milliseconds, and average amplitude was 0.65 mV. After administration of the M relaxant, the CMAP disappeared. In group B, no CMAP was observed immediately after administration of the M relaxant. CONCLUSION: Administration of the inhalational anesthetic, opioids, and local anesthetic did not influence the M response of M fibers in the levator ani M on sEMG and enables its localization during ARM reconstruction. Nondepolarizing M relaxation completely abolished the response. If M relaxant is necessary, cisatracurium is used. The most suitable method of anesthesia for ARM surgery appears to be inhalational anesthesia supplemented by opioids and epidural analgesia.
650    _2
$a anální kanál $x abnormality $7 D001003
650    _2
$a epidurální anestezie $7 D000767
650    _2
$a inhalační anestezie $7 D000769
650    _2
$a intravenózní anestezie $7 D000771
650    _2
$a anestetika inhalační $x farmakologie $7 D018685
650    _2
$a anestetika intravenózní $x farmakologie $7 D018686
650    _2
$a anestetika lokální $x farmakologie $7 D000779
650    _2
$a atrakurium $x analogy a deriváty $x farmakologie $7 D001279
650    _2
$a bupivakain $x analogy a deriváty $x farmakologie $7 D002045
650    _2
$a abnormality trávicího systému $x diagnóza $7 D004065
650    _2
$a elektrody $7 D004566
650    _2
$a elektromyografie $x přístrojové vybavení $x metody $7 D004576
650    _2
$a design vybavení $7 D004867
650    _2
$a motorické evokované potenciály $x účinky léků $7 D019054
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a kojenec $7 D007223
650    _2
$a novorozenec $7 D007231
650    _2
$a peroperační péče $x metody $7 D007430
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a methylethery $x farmakologie $7 D008738
650    _2
$a nedepolarizující myorelaxancia $x farmakologie $7 D003473
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a reakční čas $x účinky léků $7 D011930
650    _2
$a rektum $x abnormality $7 D012007
650    _2
$a sufentanil $x aplikace a dávkování $x farmakologie $7 D017409
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
700    1_
$a Skába, Richard
700    1_
$a Kraus, Josef
700    1_
$a Cvachovec, Karel
773    0_
$w MED00002884 $t Journal of pediatric surgery $x 1531-5037 $g Roč. 46, č. 11 (2011), s. 2135-9
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22075345 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m
990    __
$a 20120815 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20121210093121 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 946438 $s 781618
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2011 $b 46 $c 11 $d 2135-9 $i 1531-5037 $m Journal of pediatric surgery $n J Pediatr Surg $x MED00002884
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20120815/12/02

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...