Influence of anesthesia on the results of intraoperative diagnostic electromyostimulation in patients with anorectal malformation
Language English Country United States Media print
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial
PubMed
22075345
DOI
10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.07.021
PII: S0022-3468(11)00645-2
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Digestive System Abnormalities diagnosis MeSH
- Anal Canal abnormalities MeSH
- Anesthetics, Inhalation pharmacology MeSH
- Anesthetics, Intravenous pharmacology MeSH
- Anesthetics, Local pharmacology MeSH
- Atracurium analogs & derivatives pharmacology MeSH
- Bupivacaine analogs & derivatives pharmacology MeSH
- Equipment Design MeSH
- Electrodes MeSH
- Electromyography instrumentation methods MeSH
- Anesthesia, Epidural * MeSH
- Anesthesia, Inhalation * MeSH
- Anesthesia, Intravenous * MeSH
- Infant MeSH
- Levobupivacaine MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Methyl Ethers pharmacology MeSH
- Evoked Potentials, Motor drug effects MeSH
- Neuromuscular Nondepolarizing Agents pharmacology MeSH
- Infant, Newborn MeSH
- Intraoperative Care methods MeSH
- Prospective Studies MeSH
- Reaction Time drug effects MeSH
- Rectum abnormalities MeSH
- Sevoflurane MeSH
- Sufentanil administration & dosage pharmacology MeSH
- Check Tag
- Infant MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Infant, Newborn MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Anesthetics, Inhalation MeSH
- Anesthetics, Intravenous MeSH
- Anesthetics, Local MeSH
- Atracurium MeSH
- Bupivacaine MeSH
- cisatracurium MeSH Browser
- Levobupivacaine MeSH
- Methyl Ethers MeSH
- Neuromuscular Nondepolarizing Agents MeSH
- Sevoflurane MeSH
- Sufentanil MeSH
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Stimulation electromyography (sEMG) is useful in identifying the sphincter muscle (M) in patients with anorectal malformations (ARMs). This study evaluates the effect of anesthetic agents and M relaxants on sEMG findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventeen infants (10 boys and 7 girls) with a mean age of 6.3 months and mean body weight of 6.7 kg were included in a prospective randomized study. Anesthesia was induced by sevoflurane and opioids, and an epidural catheter was inserted caudally. Stimulation electromyography of levator ani M using 14 mA current was used, and latency and amplitude of the evoked compound M action potential (CMAP) were recorded. Patients were randomized into 2 groups. Group A received a local anesthetic epidurally, and sEMG was performed. Administration of the M relaxant and measurement of M response followed. In group B drug administration, sEMG and response measurement were performed after administration of M relaxant. RESULTS: Baseline CMAP was recorded in all patients. Average latency was 4.1 milliseconds, and average amplitude was 0.43 mV. In group A, the average latency was 4.0 milliseconds, and average amplitude was 0.65 mV. After administration of the M relaxant, the CMAP disappeared. In group B, no CMAP was observed immediately after administration of the M relaxant. CONCLUSION: Administration of the inhalational anesthetic, opioids, and local anesthetic did not influence the M response of M fibers in the levator ani M on sEMG and enables its localization during ARM reconstruction. Nondepolarizing M relaxation completely abolished the response. If M relaxant is necessary, cisatracurium is used. The most suitable method of anesthesia for ARM surgery appears to be inhalational anesthesia supplemented by opioids and epidural analgesia.
References provided by Crossref.org