-
Something wrong with this record ?
Development of the Brief Bedside Dysphagia Screening Test in the Czech Republic
P. Mandysova, J. Skvrňáková, E. Ehler, M. Cerný,
Language English Country Australia
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Validation Study
- MeSH
- Video Recording instrumentation MeSH
- Fluoroscopy instrumentation methods MeSH
- Risk Assessment methods MeSH
- Confidence Intervals MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Deglutition MeSH
- Deglutition Disorders diagnosis nursing MeSH
- Predictive Value of Tests MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Sensitivity and Specificity MeSH
- Health Status Indicators MeSH
- Point-of-Care Systems MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
- Validation Study MeSH
- Geographicals
- Czech Republic MeSH
In patients who are prone to impaired swallowing, dysphagia screening has been advocated. However, most dysphagia screening tests are lacking gold-standard validation and nurse screeners. The purpose of this study was to develop a nursing dysphagia screening test to determine the penetration or aspiration risk in patients with neurological and ear, nose, and throat conditions. Eighty-seven Czech patients underwent a bedside assessment by nurse screeners. A comparison of the results to the gold standard, flexible endoscopic examination of swallowing, identified eight "important" or "marginal" assessment items, which were combined into one test, called the Brief Bedside Dysphagia Screening Test: "ability to clench the teeth"; "symmetry/strength of the tongue"; "symmetry/strength of the facial muscles"; "symmetry/strength of the shoulder shrug"; "dysarthria"; "thick liquid: choking"; "thick liquid: dripping from the mouth"; and "thick liquid: cough". The sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value of the Brief Bedside Dysphagia Screening Test were: 87.1%, 30.4%, and 81%, respectively, in all patients; 95.2%, 27.5%, and 93.3%, respectively, in patients with neurological conditions; and 60%, 60%, and 42.9%, respectively, in patients with ear, nose, and throat conditions. The test is more suitable for patients with neurological conditions than for more heterogeneous patient populations.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12024374
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20170626090101.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 120815s2011 at f 000 0#eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1111/j.1442-2018.2011.00630.x $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)21883767
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a at
- 100 1_
- $a Mandysová, Petra $u Faculty of Health Studies, University of Pardubice, Pardubice Regional Hospital, Pardubice, Czech Republic. Petra.Mandysova@upce.cz $7 xx0085709
- 245 10
- $a Development of the Brief Bedside Dysphagia Screening Test in the Czech Republic / $c P. Mandysova, J. Skvrňáková, E. Ehler, M. Cerný,
- 520 9_
- $a In patients who are prone to impaired swallowing, dysphagia screening has been advocated. However, most dysphagia screening tests are lacking gold-standard validation and nurse screeners. The purpose of this study was to develop a nursing dysphagia screening test to determine the penetration or aspiration risk in patients with neurological and ear, nose, and throat conditions. Eighty-seven Czech patients underwent a bedside assessment by nurse screeners. A comparison of the results to the gold standard, flexible endoscopic examination of swallowing, identified eight "important" or "marginal" assessment items, which were combined into one test, called the Brief Bedside Dysphagia Screening Test: "ability to clench the teeth"; "symmetry/strength of the tongue"; "symmetry/strength of the facial muscles"; "symmetry/strength of the shoulder shrug"; "dysarthria"; "thick liquid: choking"; "thick liquid: dripping from the mouth"; and "thick liquid: cough". The sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value of the Brief Bedside Dysphagia Screening Test were: 87.1%, 30.4%, and 81%, respectively, in all patients; 95.2%, 27.5%, and 93.3%, respectively, in patients with neurological conditions; and 60%, 60%, and 42.9%, respectively, in patients with ear, nose, and throat conditions. The test is more suitable for patients with neurological conditions than for more heterogeneous patient populations.
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a interval spolehlivosti $7 D016001
- 650 _2
- $a polykání $7 D003679
- 650 _2
- $a poruchy polykání $x diagnóza $x ošetřování $7 D003680
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a fluoroskopie $x přístrojové vybavení $x metody $7 D005471
- 650 _2
- $a ukazatele zdravotního stavu $7 D006305
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a vyšetření u lůžka $7 D019095
- 650 _2
- $a prediktivní hodnota testů $7 D011237
- 650 _2
- $a hodnocení rizik $x metody $7 D018570
- 650 _2
- $a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
- 650 _2
- $a audiovizuální záznam $x přístrojové vybavení $7 D014741
- 651 _2
- $a Česká republika $7 D018153
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a validační studie $7 D023361
- 700 1_
- $a Skvrňáková, Jana
- 700 1_
- $a Ehler, Edvard
- 700 1_
- $a Cerný, Michal
- 773 0_
- $w MED00007213 $t Nursing & health sciences $x 1442-2018 $g Roč. 13, č. 4 (2011), s. 388-95
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21883767 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20120815 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20170626090523 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 946522 $s 781702
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2011 $b 13 $c 4 $d 388-95 $e 20110831 $i 1442-2018 $m Nursing & health sciences $n Nurs Health Sci $x MED00007213
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20120815/12/02