-
Something wrong with this record ?
CCND1 and ZNF217 gene amplification is equally frequent in BRCA1 and BRCA2 associated and non-BRCA breast cancer
P. Plevova, D. Cerna, A. Balcar, L. Foretova, J. Zapletalova, E. Silhanova, R. Curik, J. Dvorackova,
Language English Country Slovakia
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Grant support
NR9092
MZ0
CEP Register
- MeSH
- Gene Amplification MeSH
- Cyclin D1 genetics MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast genetics metabolism pathology MeSH
- ErbB Receptors metabolism MeSH
- Genetic Predisposition to Disease MeSH
- In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence MeSH
- Immunoenzyme Techniques MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Carcinoma, Lobular genetics metabolism pathology MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous genetics metabolism pathology MeSH
- Breast Neoplasms genetics metabolism pathology MeSH
- Prognosis MeSH
- BRCA1 Protein genetics MeSH
- BRCA2 Protein genetics MeSH
- Apoptosis Regulatory Proteins MeSH
- Receptor, ErbB-2 metabolism MeSH
- Receptors, Estrogen metabolism MeSH
- Receptors, Progesterone metabolism MeSH
- Trans-Activators genetics MeSH
- Germ-Line Mutation genetics MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
Breast cancer associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations differs from non-BRCA tumors in several respects. We determined whether there was any difference in CCND1 (11q13) and ZNF217 (20q13) gene amplification with respect to BRCA status. Of 40 breast cancer samples examined, 15 and 9 were from BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, respectively, and 16 from patients without mutation. Fluorescence in situ hybridization showed that eight tumors exhibited CCND1 amplification (20%; 3 BRCA1, 3 BRCA2, 2 non-BRCA). ZNF217 amplification was observed in three of 38 cases (8%; 2 BRCA1, 1 non-BRCA). There was no significant difference in CCND1 and ZNF217 amplification between BRCA1, BRCA2 and non-BRCA tumors. CCND1 amplification was associated with decreased disease-free (P = 0.045) and overall survival (P = 0.015). BRCA1 tumors with CCND1 amplification were estrogen receptor negative, in contrast to CCND1 amplified BRCA2 and non-BRCA tumors, suggesting that concurrent CCND1 amplification and estrogen and progesterone receptor negativity may predict germline BRCA1 gene mutation. All ZNF217 amplified tumors were of the medullary histological type (P = 0.002). There was no statistical correlation between CCND1 and ZNF217 amplification and estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and ERBB2 expression and TNM classification. CCND1 amplification did not correlate with EGFR expression.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12025753
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20140312120830.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 120817s2010 xo f 000 0#eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.4149/neo_2010_04_325 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)20429623
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xo
- 100 1_
- $a Plevova, P $u Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty Hospital of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic. pavlina.plevova@volny
- 245 10
- $a CCND1 and ZNF217 gene amplification is equally frequent in BRCA1 and BRCA2 associated and non-BRCA breast cancer / $c P. Plevova, D. Cerna, A. Balcar, L. Foretova, J. Zapletalova, E. Silhanova, R. Curik, J. Dvorackova,
- 520 9_
- $a Breast cancer associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations differs from non-BRCA tumors in several respects. We determined whether there was any difference in CCND1 (11q13) and ZNF217 (20q13) gene amplification with respect to BRCA status. Of 40 breast cancer samples examined, 15 and 9 were from BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, respectively, and 16 from patients without mutation. Fluorescence in situ hybridization showed that eight tumors exhibited CCND1 amplification (20%; 3 BRCA1, 3 BRCA2, 2 non-BRCA). ZNF217 amplification was observed in three of 38 cases (8%; 2 BRCA1, 1 non-BRCA). There was no significant difference in CCND1 and ZNF217 amplification between BRCA1, BRCA2 and non-BRCA tumors. CCND1 amplification was associated with decreased disease-free (P = 0.045) and overall survival (P = 0.015). BRCA1 tumors with CCND1 amplification were estrogen receptor negative, in contrast to CCND1 amplified BRCA2 and non-BRCA tumors, suggesting that concurrent CCND1 amplification and estrogen and progesterone receptor negativity may predict germline BRCA1 gene mutation. All ZNF217 amplified tumors were of the medullary histological type (P = 0.002). There was no statistical correlation between CCND1 and ZNF217 amplification and estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and ERBB2 expression and TNM classification. CCND1 amplification did not correlate with EGFR expression.
- 650 _2
- $a mucinózní adenokarcinom $x genetika $x metabolismus $x patologie $7 D002288
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a proteiny regulující apoptózu $7 D051017
- 650 _2
- $a protein BRCA1 $x genetika $7 D019313
- 650 _2
- $a protein BRCA2 $x genetika $7 D024682
- 650 _2
- $a nádory prsu $x genetika $x metabolismus $x patologie $7 D001943
- 650 _2
- $a duktální karcinom prsu $x genetika $x metabolismus $x patologie $7 D018270
- 650 _2
- $a lobulární karcinom $x genetika $x metabolismus $x patologie $7 D018275
- 650 _2
- $a cyklin D1 $x genetika $7 D019938
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a amplifikace genu $7 D005784
- 650 _2
- $a genetická predispozice k nemoci $7 D020022
- 650 _2
- $a zárodečné mutace $x genetika $7 D018095
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a imunoenzymatické techniky $7 D007124
- 650 _2
- $a hybridizace in situ fluorescenční $7 D017404
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a prognóza $7 D011379
- 650 _2
- $a erbB receptory $x metabolismus $7 D066246
- 650 _2
- $a receptor erbB-2 $x metabolismus $7 D018719
- 650 _2
- $a receptory pro estrogeny $x metabolismus $7 D011960
- 650 _2
- $a receptory progesteronu $x metabolismus $7 D011980
- 650 _2
- $a trans-aktivátory $x genetika $7 D015534
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Cerna, D
- 700 1_
- $a Balcar, A
- 700 1_
- $a Foretova, L
- 700 1_
- $a Zapletalova, J
- 700 1_
- $a Silhanova, E
- 700 1_
- $a Curik, R
- 700 1_
- $a Dvorackova, J
- 773 0_
- $w MED00003470 $t Neoplasma $x 0028-2685 $g Roč. 57, č. 4 (2010), s. 325-32
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20429623 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b A 1194 $c 659 $y m $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20120817 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20140312120838 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 947795 $s 783099
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2010 $b 57 $c 4 $d 325-32 $i 0028-2685 $m Neoplasma $n Neoplasma $x MED00003470
- GRA __
- $a NR9092 $p MZ0
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20120817/10/03