-
Something wrong with this record ?
Recognition of beer brand based on multivariate analysis of volatile fingerprint
T. Cajka, K. Riddellova, M. Tomaniova, J. Hajslova,
Language English Country Netherlands
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- MeSH
- Multivariate Analysis MeSH
- Beer analysis MeSH
- Quality Control MeSH
- Volatile Organic Compounds analysis MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
Automated head-space solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME)-based sampling procedure, coupled to gas chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC-TOFMS), was developed and employed for obtaining of fingerprints (GC profiles) of beer volatiles. In total, 265 speciality beer samples were collected over a 1-year period with the aim to distinguish, based on analytical (profiling) data, (i) the beers labelled as Rochefort 8; (ii) a group consisting of Rochefort 6, 8, 10 beers; and (iii) Trappist beers. For the chemometric evaluation of the data, partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), and artificial neural networks with multilayer perceptrons (ANN-MLP) were tested. The best prediction ability was obtained for the model that distinguished a group of Rochefort 6, 8, 10 beers from the rest of beers. In this case, all chemometric tools employed provided 100% correct classification. Slightly worse prediction abilities were achieved for the models "Trappist vs. non-Trappist beers" with the values of 93.9% (PLS-DA), 91.9% (LDA) and 97.0% (ANN-MLP) and "Rochefort 8 vs. the rest" with the values of 87.9% (PLS-DA) and 84.8% (LDA) and 93.9% (ANN-MLP). In addition to chromatographic profiling, also the potential of direct coupling of SPME (extraction/pre-concentration device) with high-resolution TOFMS employing a direct analysis in real time (DART) ion source has been demonstrated as a challenging profiling approach.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12025964
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20121207115905.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 120817e20100104ne f 000 0#eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.12.049 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)20074737
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ne
- 100 1_
- $a Cajka, Tomas $u Institute of Chemical Technology, Prague, Faculty of Food and Biochemical Technology, Department of Food Chemistry and Analysis, Technicka 3, 16628 Prague 6, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Recognition of beer brand based on multivariate analysis of volatile fingerprint / $c T. Cajka, K. Riddellova, M. Tomaniova, J. Hajslova,
- 520 9_
- $a Automated head-space solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME)-based sampling procedure, coupled to gas chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC-TOFMS), was developed and employed for obtaining of fingerprints (GC profiles) of beer volatiles. In total, 265 speciality beer samples were collected over a 1-year period with the aim to distinguish, based on analytical (profiling) data, (i) the beers labelled as Rochefort 8; (ii) a group consisting of Rochefort 6, 8, 10 beers; and (iii) Trappist beers. For the chemometric evaluation of the data, partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), and artificial neural networks with multilayer perceptrons (ANN-MLP) were tested. The best prediction ability was obtained for the model that distinguished a group of Rochefort 6, 8, 10 beers from the rest of beers. In this case, all chemometric tools employed provided 100% correct classification. Slightly worse prediction abilities were achieved for the models "Trappist vs. non-Trappist beers" with the values of 93.9% (PLS-DA), 91.9% (LDA) and 97.0% (ANN-MLP) and "Rochefort 8 vs. the rest" with the values of 87.9% (PLS-DA) and 84.8% (LDA) and 93.9% (ANN-MLP). In addition to chromatographic profiling, also the potential of direct coupling of SPME (extraction/pre-concentration device) with high-resolution TOFMS employing a direct analysis in real time (DART) ion source has been demonstrated as a challenging profiling approach.
- 650 _2
- $a pivo $x analýza $7 D001515
- 650 _2
- $a multivariační analýza $7 D015999
- 650 _2
- $a řízení kvality $7 D011786
- 650 _2
- $a těkavé organické sloučeniny $x analýza $7 D055549
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Riddellova, Katerina
- 700 1_
- $a Tomaniova, Monika
- 700 1_
- $a Hajslova, Jana
- 773 0_
- $w MED00004962 $t Journal of chromatography. A $x 1873-3778 $g Roč. 1217, č. 25 (20100104), s. 4195-203
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20074737 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m
- 990 __
- $a 20120817 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20121207115940 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 948006 $s 783310
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2010 $b 1217 $c 25 $d 4195-203 $e 20100104 $i 1873-3778 $m Journal of chromatography. A, Including electrophoresis and other separation methods $n J Chromatogr A $x MED00004962
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20120817/10/03