-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Determination of capsidiol in tobacco cells culture by HPLC
P. Literakova, J. Lochman, Z. Zdrahal, Z. Prokop, V. Mikes, T. Kasparovsky
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- chemická frakcionace MeSH
- chromatografie kapalinová MeSH
- hmotnostní spektrometrie MeSH
- kultivované buňky MeSH
- lineární modely MeSH
- plynová chromatografie s hmotnostně spektrometrickou detekcí MeSH
- reprodukovatelnost výsledků MeSH
- rostlinné extrakty analýza MeSH
- seskviterpeny analýza MeSH
- tabák chemie MeSH
- vysokoúčinná kapalinová chromatografie metody MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
Capsidiol is a bicyclic sesquiterpene, which accumulates extracellularly in plants, and has been isolated from many types of Solanaceae. It acts as a phytoalexin produced by Nicotiana tabacum in response to pathogens. Capsidiol has antifungal activity and is formed first in tobacco and pepper plants after infestation. The amount of capsidiol in tobacco cell suspension culture has been previously determined by solid-phase extraction and organic solvent extraction with thin-layer chromatography or gas chromatography analysis. A high-performance liquid chromatography method with UV detection at 210 nm on a C(8) column utilizing both extraction methods was developed to analyze capsidiol in suspension cell culture. The HPLC method was linear in the concentration range of 0.1-2.0 mg/L. The lower limit of quantitation was 0.1 mg/L. Organic solvent extraction and solid-phase extraction methods were compared. Both methods are generally similar in their overall efficiency (82% and 75%, respectively), but eliminations of interfering compounds are different. The relative standard deviation across five extractions of known amounts of capsidiol from plant sample was less than 5.1%. The relative standard deviation across five elicitations of cell cultures was less than 5.9%. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of capsidiol was performed, and corresponding mass spectra are presented.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12026113
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20130423084037.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 120817s2010 xxu f 000 0#eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1093/chromsci/48.6.436 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)20822656
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Literaková, Petra $u Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlarska 2, 61137 Brno, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Determination of capsidiol in tobacco cells culture by HPLC / $c P. Literakova, J. Lochman, Z. Zdrahal, Z. Prokop, V. Mikes, T. Kasparovsky
- 520 9_
- $a Capsidiol is a bicyclic sesquiterpene, which accumulates extracellularly in plants, and has been isolated from many types of Solanaceae. It acts as a phytoalexin produced by Nicotiana tabacum in response to pathogens. Capsidiol has antifungal activity and is formed first in tobacco and pepper plants after infestation. The amount of capsidiol in tobacco cell suspension culture has been previously determined by solid-phase extraction and organic solvent extraction with thin-layer chromatography or gas chromatography analysis. A high-performance liquid chromatography method with UV detection at 210 nm on a C(8) column utilizing both extraction methods was developed to analyze capsidiol in suspension cell culture. The HPLC method was linear in the concentration range of 0.1-2.0 mg/L. The lower limit of quantitation was 0.1 mg/L. Organic solvent extraction and solid-phase extraction methods were compared. Both methods are generally similar in their overall efficiency (82% and 75%, respectively), but eliminations of interfering compounds are different. The relative standard deviation across five extractions of known amounts of capsidiol from plant sample was less than 5.1%. The relative standard deviation across five elicitations of cell cultures was less than 5.9%. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of capsidiol was performed, and corresponding mass spectra are presented.
- 650 _2
- $a kultivované buňky $7 D002478
- 650 _2
- $a chemická frakcionace $7 D005591
- 650 _2
- $a vysokoúčinná kapalinová chromatografie $x metody $7 D002851
- 650 _2
- $a chromatografie kapalinová $7 D002853
- 650 _2
- $a plynová chromatografie s hmotnostně spektrometrickou detekcí $7 D008401
- 650 _2
- $a lineární modely $7 D016014
- 650 _2
- $a hmotnostní spektrometrie $7 D013058
- 650 _2
- $a rostlinné extrakty $x analýza $7 D010936
- 650 _2
- $a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
- 650 _2
- $a seskviterpeny $x analýza $7 D012717
- 650 _2
- $a tabák $x chemie $7 D014026
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Lochman, Jan $7 xx0128720
- 700 1_
- $a Zdráhal, Zbyněk $7 xx0074482
- 700 1_
- $a Prokop, Zbyněk, $d 1974- $7 nlk20030127804
- 700 1_
- $a Mikeš, Vladimír, $d 1950-2007 $7 mzk2003181728
- 700 1#
- $a Kašparovský, Tomáš. $7 _AN071162
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002734 $t Journal of chromatographic science $x 1945-239X $g Roč. 48, č. 6 (2010), s. 436-40
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20822656 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m
- 990 __
- $a 20120817 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20130423084323 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 948155 $s 783459
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2010 $b 48 $c 6 $d 436-40 $i 1945-239X $m Journal of chromatographic science $n J Chromatogr Sci $x MED00002734
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20120817/10/04