-
Something wrong with this record ?
Mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) fauna in an area endemic for West Nile virus
O. Sebesta, J. Halouzka, Z. Hubálek, Z. Juricová, I. Rudolf, S. Sikutová, P. Svobodová, P. Reiter,
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
ProQuest Central
from 2009-06-01 to 2020-12-31
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2006-12-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2009-06-01 to 2020-12-31
- MeSH
- Aedes growth & development virology MeSH
- Anopheles growth & development virology MeSH
- Culicidae growth & development virology MeSH
- West Nile Fever epidemiology transmission MeSH
- Geography MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
Mosquito collections with CDC light traps using dry ice and pigeon-baited traps were carried out in south Moravia (Czech Republic) from April to October in 2007 and 2008 at two study sites. In 2007, 11 two-day captures were carried out in two-week intervals, and 1,490 female mosquitoes of nine species were caught. In 2008, 15 two-day trappings of mosquitoes were carried out: 6,778 females of 22 species of mosquitoes were trapped. The results showed marked differences in abundance and species composition of mosquitoes between both study sites and between the trapping methods. In the floodplain forest ecosystem of the Soutok study area, Aedes vexans predominated. The species composition in the Nesyt study site was more varied and the most common species was Culex pipiens. At the latter study site, Anopheles hyrcanus (var. pseudopictus) and Uranotaenia unguiculata, mosquito species with largely southern Eurasian distribution, were repeatedly demonstrated. The largest capture of mosquitoes was in traps with CO2 placed at a height 1 m above the ground. The capture of mosquitoes in the pigeon-baited traps as well as in the traps with CO2 placed in the canopy of trees was markedly lower in both study sites, with the predominant species being Culex pipiens.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12026260
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20130213114024.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 120817s2010 xxu f 000 0#eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1111/j.1948-7134.2010.00042.x $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)20618662
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Sebesta, O $u Institute of Vertebrate Biology ASCR, Kvetná 8, 60365 Brno, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) fauna in an area endemic for West Nile virus / $c O. Sebesta, J. Halouzka, Z. Hubálek, Z. Juricová, I. Rudolf, S. Sikutová, P. Svobodová, P. Reiter,
- 520 9_
- $a Mosquito collections with CDC light traps using dry ice and pigeon-baited traps were carried out in south Moravia (Czech Republic) from April to October in 2007 and 2008 at two study sites. In 2007, 11 two-day captures were carried out in two-week intervals, and 1,490 female mosquitoes of nine species were caught. In 2008, 15 two-day trappings of mosquitoes were carried out: 6,778 females of 22 species of mosquitoes were trapped. The results showed marked differences in abundance and species composition of mosquitoes between both study sites and between the trapping methods. In the floodplain forest ecosystem of the Soutok study area, Aedes vexans predominated. The species composition in the Nesyt study site was more varied and the most common species was Culex pipiens. At the latter study site, Anopheles hyrcanus (var. pseudopictus) and Uranotaenia unguiculata, mosquito species with largely southern Eurasian distribution, were repeatedly demonstrated. The largest capture of mosquitoes was in traps with CO2 placed at a height 1 m above the ground. The capture of mosquitoes in the pigeon-baited traps as well as in the traps with CO2 placed in the canopy of trees was markedly lower in both study sites, with the predominant species being Culex pipiens.
- 650 _2
- $a Aedes $x růst a vývoj $x virologie $7 D000330
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a Anopheles $x růst a vývoj $x virologie $7 D000852
- 650 _2
- $a Culicidae $x růst a vývoj $x virologie $7 D009033
- 650 _2
- $a zeměpis $7 D005843
- 650 _2
- $a západonilská horečka $x epidemiologie $x přenos $7 D014901
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Halouzka, J
- 700 1_
- $a Hubálek, Z
- 700 1_
- $a Juricová, Z
- 700 1_
- $a Rudolf, I
- 700 1_
- $a Sikutová, S
- 700 1_
- $a Svobodová, P
- 700 1_
- $a Reiter, P
- 773 0_
- $w MED00180380 $t Journal of vector ecology : journal of the Society for Vector Ecology $x 1081-1710 $g Roč. 35, č. 1 (2010), s. 156-62
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20618662 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m
- 990 __
- $a 20120817 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20130213114208 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 948302 $s 783606
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2010 $b 35 $c 1 $d 156-62 $i 1081-1710 $m Journal of vector ecology $n J Vector Ecol $x MED00180380
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20120817/10/04