-
Something wrong with this record ?
Rare and asymmetrical hybridization of the endemic Barbus carpathicus with its widespread congener Barbus barbus
Z. Lajbner, V. Slechtová, V. Slechta, M. Svátora, P. Berrebi, P. Kotlík,
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- MeSH
- Alleles MeSH
- Chimera MeSH
- Cyprinidae genetics MeSH
- Genetic Variation MeSH
- Genotype MeSH
- Hybridization, Genetic MeSH
- Isoenzymes analysis MeSH
- Microsatellite Repeats MeSH
- DNA, Mitochondrial genetics MeSH
- Multilocus Sequence Typing MeSH
- Genetics, Population MeSH
- Rivers MeSH
- Sequence Analysis, DNA MeSH
- Linkage Disequilibrium MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Geographicals
- Slovakia MeSH
In endemic species that co-occur with widespread congeners, hybridization can lead to an influx of novel and beneficial genetic variation, but high rates of introgression may cause genetic swamping of the endemic species and have detrimental effects on its survival potential. This study examines hybridization between sympatric populations of the Carpathian barbel Barbus carpathicus, a recently discovered cryptic species with a restricted range, and the widespread common barbel Barbus barbus. Based on six diagnostic allozyme loci, a microsatellite locus and mtDNA, hybrids were found to be present at multiple localities within the Vistula River drainage (Baltic Sea) as well as in the Tisza River system of the Danube River drainage (Black Sea). However, the numbers of hybrids were very low; four individuals of 230 fish sampled from the Vistula drainage. Bayesian assessment of their nuclear genotypes suggested that two hybrids in the Vistula drainage and nine in the Tisza system were F1 generation, and one in the Vistula drainage and one in the Tisza system were backcrosses (BC) to B. barbus, while no F2 or BC to B. carpathicus were detected. No hybrid carried B. carpathicus mtDNA and cytonuclear linkage disequilibria showed significant positive associations between hybrid genotypes and B. barbus mtDNA, suggesting unidirectionality in the interspecific mating with a disproportionate contribution of B. barbus mothers. Despite geographically broad occurrence of hybrids, these data provide evidence of strong constraints on hybridization in the native breeding habitats and the lack of introgression towards B. carpathicus.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12026522
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20130125092021.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 120817s2009 enk f 000 0#eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2008.02098.x $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)20735568
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Lajbner, Z $u Department of Vertebrate Evolutionary Biology and Genetics, Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Rumburská 89, 277 21 Libechov, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Rare and asymmetrical hybridization of the endemic Barbus carpathicus with its widespread congener Barbus barbus / $c Z. Lajbner, V. Slechtová, V. Slechta, M. Svátora, P. Berrebi, P. Kotlík,
- 520 9_
- $a In endemic species that co-occur with widespread congeners, hybridization can lead to an influx of novel and beneficial genetic variation, but high rates of introgression may cause genetic swamping of the endemic species and have detrimental effects on its survival potential. This study examines hybridization between sympatric populations of the Carpathian barbel Barbus carpathicus, a recently discovered cryptic species with a restricted range, and the widespread common barbel Barbus barbus. Based on six diagnostic allozyme loci, a microsatellite locus and mtDNA, hybrids were found to be present at multiple localities within the Vistula River drainage (Baltic Sea) as well as in the Tisza River system of the Danube River drainage (Black Sea). However, the numbers of hybrids were very low; four individuals of 230 fish sampled from the Vistula drainage. Bayesian assessment of their nuclear genotypes suggested that two hybrids in the Vistula drainage and nine in the Tisza system were F1 generation, and one in the Vistula drainage and one in the Tisza system were backcrosses (BC) to B. barbus, while no F2 or BC to B. carpathicus were detected. No hybrid carried B. carpathicus mtDNA and cytonuclear linkage disequilibria showed significant positive associations between hybrid genotypes and B. barbus mtDNA, suggesting unidirectionality in the interspecific mating with a disproportionate contribution of B. barbus mothers. Despite geographically broad occurrence of hybrids, these data provide evidence of strong constraints on hybridization in the native breeding habitats and the lack of introgression towards B. carpathicus.
- 650 _2
- $a alely $7 D000483
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a chiméra $7 D002678
- 650 _2
- $a Cyprinidae $x genetika $7 D003530
- 650 _2
- $a mitochondriální DNA $x genetika $7 D004272
- 650 _2
- $a genetická variace $7 D014644
- 650 _2
- $a populační genetika $7 D005828
- 650 _2
- $a genotyp $7 D005838
- 650 _2
- $a hybridizace genetická $7 D006824
- 650 _2
- $a izoenzymy $x analýza $7 D007527
- 650 _2
- $a vazebná nerovnováha $7 D015810
- 650 _2
- $a mikrosatelitní repetice $7 D018895
- 650 _2
- $a multilokusová sekvenční typizace $7 D058885
- 650 _2
- $a řeky $7 D045483
- 650 _2
- $a sekvenční analýza DNA $7 D017422
- 651 _2
- $a Slovenská republika $7 D018154
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Slechtová, V
- 700 1_
- $a Slechta, V
- 700 1_
- $a Svátora, M
- 700 1_
- $a Berrebi, P
- 700 1_
- $a Kotlík, P
- 773 0_
- $w MED00180294 $t Journal of fish biology $x 1095-8649 $g Roč. 74, č. 2 (2009), s. 418-36
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20735568 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m
- 990 __
- $a 20120817 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20130125092142 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 948564 $s 783868
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2009 $b 74 $c 2 $d 418-36 $i 1095-8649 $m Journal of fish biology $n J Fish Biol $x MED00180294
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20120817/10/04