Detail
Článek
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Isolated left ventricular pacing results in worse long-term clinical outcome when compared with biventricular pacing: a single-centre randomized study

Kamil Sedláček, Lucie Burianová, Hanka Mlčochová, Petr Peichl, Tomáš Marek, and Josef Kautzner

. 2010 ; 12 (12) : 1762-1768. [pub] 20100821

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc12027376

Grantová podpora
NS9698 MZ0 CEP - Centrální evidence projektů

AIMS: The objective of this study was to compare long-term clinical effects of biventricular pacing with isolated left ventricular pacing. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty consecutive patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy were randomized to biventricular or isolated left ventricular pacing. Clinical and echocardiographic parameters were studied regularly prior to implantation and during 1 year of follow-up. Patients with atrial fibrillation were excluded from the study. A retrospective cross-sectional outcome analysis was performed 4 years after the beginning of the study. Biventricular pacing was associated with more pronounced clinical and echocardiographic benefit compared with left ventricular pacing. Biventricular pacing was associated with significantly more distinct reverse remodelling. Left ventricular ejection fraction improved by 12.5 per cent-points (95% CI 7.3-17.7) compared with 5.1 per cent-points (95% CI 1.1-9.2) (P = 0.01) and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter decreased by 8.69 mm (95% CI 5.2-12.2) compared with 5.1 mm (95% CI 1.5-8.7) (P = 0.05) in the biventricular and left-ventricular pacing group, respectively. Semi-quantitative summarization of response points revealed a greater benefit in the biventricular vs. left ventricular pacing group [mean sum of response points 3.25 (95% CI 2.62-3.88) vs. 2.35 (95% CI 1.74-2.96), respectively, P = 0.06]. After 3 years of follow-up, there was no cardiovascular death in the biventricular pacing group compared with three cardiovascular deaths in the left ventricular pacing group. CONCLUSION: In patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, biventricular pacing is associated with significantly more pronounced benefit in clinical outcomes and reverse remodelling. A retrospective analysis after 3 years of follow-up suggests that isolated left ventricular pacing may be associated with a higher mortality rate compared with biventricular pacing.

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc12027376
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20160226161534.0
007      
ta
008      
120816s2010 enk f 000 0#eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1093/europace/euq307 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)20729533
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Sedlacek, Kamil $u Clinic of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM), Prague, Czech Republic $7 jo2008446723
245    10
$a Isolated left ventricular pacing results in worse long-term clinical outcome when compared with biventricular pacing: a single-centre randomized study / $c Kamil Sedláček, Lucie Burianová, Hanka Mlčochová, Petr Peichl, Tomáš Marek, and Josef Kautzner
520    9_
$a AIMS: The objective of this study was to compare long-term clinical effects of biventricular pacing with isolated left ventricular pacing. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty consecutive patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy were randomized to biventricular or isolated left ventricular pacing. Clinical and echocardiographic parameters were studied regularly prior to implantation and during 1 year of follow-up. Patients with atrial fibrillation were excluded from the study. A retrospective cross-sectional outcome analysis was performed 4 years after the beginning of the study. Biventricular pacing was associated with more pronounced clinical and echocardiographic benefit compared with left ventricular pacing. Biventricular pacing was associated with significantly more distinct reverse remodelling. Left ventricular ejection fraction improved by 12.5 per cent-points (95% CI 7.3-17.7) compared with 5.1 per cent-points (95% CI 1.1-9.2) (P = 0.01) and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter decreased by 8.69 mm (95% CI 5.2-12.2) compared with 5.1 mm (95% CI 1.5-8.7) (P = 0.05) in the biventricular and left-ventricular pacing group, respectively. Semi-quantitative summarization of response points revealed a greater benefit in the biventricular vs. left ventricular pacing group [mean sum of response points 3.25 (95% CI 2.62-3.88) vs. 2.35 (95% CI 1.74-2.96), respectively, P = 0.06]. After 3 years of follow-up, there was no cardiovascular death in the biventricular pacing group compared with three cardiovascular deaths in the left ventricular pacing group. CONCLUSION: In patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, biventricular pacing is associated with significantly more pronounced benefit in clinical outcomes and reverse remodelling. A retrospective analysis after 3 years of follow-up suggests that isolated left ventricular pacing may be associated with a higher mortality rate compared with biventricular pacing.
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a srdeční resynchronizační terapie $7 D058406
650    _2
$a dilatační kardiomyopatie $x mortalita $x patofyziologie $x terapie $7 D002311
650    _2
$a průřezové studie $7 D003430
650    _2
$a echokardiografie $7 D004452
650    _2
$a elektrokardiografie $7 D004562
650    _2
$a následné studie $7 D005500
650    _2
$a srdeční komory $x patofyziologie $x ultrasonografie $7 D006352
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    _2
$a míra přežití $7 D015996
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Burianová, Lucie $u Clinic of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM), Prague, Czech Republic $7 xx0196172
700    1_
$a Mlčochová, Hanka $u Clinic of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM), Prague, Czech Republic $7 xx0119056
700    1_
$a Peichl, Petr, $u Clinic of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM), Prague, Czech Republic $d 1976- $7 xx0092197
700    1_
$a Marek, Tomáš $u Clinic of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM), Prague, Czech Republic $7 xx0059973
700    1_
$a Kautzner, Josef, $u Clinic of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM), Prague, Czech Republic $d 1957- $7 xx0037112
773    0_
$w MED00149837 $t Europace European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology $x 1532-2092 $g Roč. 12, č. 12 (2010), s. 1762-1768
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20729533 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m $z 0
990    __
$a 20120816 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20160226161251 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 949418 $s 784722
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2010 $b 12 $c 12 $d 1762-1768 $e 20100821 $i 1532-2092 $m Europace $n Europace $x MED00149837
GRA    __
$a NS9698 $p MZ0
LZP    __
$b NLK112 $a Pubmed-20120816/11/02

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat...