• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Microalgae--novel highly efficient starch producers

I. Brányiková, B. Maršálková, J. Doucha, T. Brányik, K. Bišová, V. Zachleder, M. Vítová,

. 2011 ; 108 (4) : 766-76.

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc12027721

The freshwater alga Chlorella, a highly productive source of starch, might substitute for starch-rich terrestrial plants in bioethanol production. The cultivation conditions necessary for maximizing starch content in Chlorella biomass, generated in outdoor scale-up solar photobioreactors, are described. The most important factor that can affect the rate of starch synthesis, and its accumulation, is mean illumination resulting from a combination of biomass concentration and incident light intensity. While 8.5% DW of starch was attained at a mean light intensity of 215 µmol/(m2 s1), 40% of DW was synthesized at a mean light intensity 330 µmol/(m2 s1). Another important factor is the phase of the cell cycle. The content of starch was highest (45% of DW) prior to cell division, but during the course of division, its cellular level rapidly decreased to about 13% of DW in cells grown in light, or to about 4% in those kept in the dark during the division phase. To produce biomass with high starch content, it is necessary to suppress cell division events, but not to disturb synthesis of starch in the chloroplast. The addition of cycloheximide (1 mg/L), a specific inhibitor of cytoplasmic protein synthesis, and the effect of element limitation (nitrogen, sulfur, phosphorus) were tested. The majority of the experiments were carried out in laboratory-scale photobioreactors, where culture treatments increased starch content to up to about 60% of DW in the case of cycloheximide inhibition or sulfur limitation. When the cells were limited by phosphorus or nitrogen supply, the cellular starch content increased to 55% or 38% of DW, respectively, however, after about 20 h, growth of the cultures stopped producing starch, and the content of starch again decreased. Sulfur limited and cycloheximide-treated cells maintained a high content of starch (60% of DW) for up to 2 days. Sulfur limitation, the most appropriate treatment for scaled-up culture of starch-enriched biomass, was carried out in an outdoor pilot-scale experiment. After 120 h of growth in complete mineral medium, during which time the starch content reached around 18% of DW, sulfur limitation increased the starch content to 50% of DW.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc12027721
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20121206120948.0
007      
ta
008      
120817s2011 xxu f 000 0#eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1002/bit.23016 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)21404251
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Brányiková, Irena $u Institute of Microbiology, AS CR, Department of Autotrophic Microorganisms, Laboratory of Cell Cycle of Algae, Opatovický mlýn, 379 81 Třeboň, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Microalgae--novel highly efficient starch producers / $c I. Brányiková, B. Maršálková, J. Doucha, T. Brányik, K. Bišová, V. Zachleder, M. Vítová,
520    9_
$a The freshwater alga Chlorella, a highly productive source of starch, might substitute for starch-rich terrestrial plants in bioethanol production. The cultivation conditions necessary for maximizing starch content in Chlorella biomass, generated in outdoor scale-up solar photobioreactors, are described. The most important factor that can affect the rate of starch synthesis, and its accumulation, is mean illumination resulting from a combination of biomass concentration and incident light intensity. While 8.5% DW of starch was attained at a mean light intensity of 215 µmol/(m2 s1), 40% of DW was synthesized at a mean light intensity 330 µmol/(m2 s1). Another important factor is the phase of the cell cycle. The content of starch was highest (45% of DW) prior to cell division, but during the course of division, its cellular level rapidly decreased to about 13% of DW in cells grown in light, or to about 4% in those kept in the dark during the division phase. To produce biomass with high starch content, it is necessary to suppress cell division events, but not to disturb synthesis of starch in the chloroplast. The addition of cycloheximide (1 mg/L), a specific inhibitor of cytoplasmic protein synthesis, and the effect of element limitation (nitrogen, sulfur, phosphorus) were tested. The majority of the experiments were carried out in laboratory-scale photobioreactors, where culture treatments increased starch content to up to about 60% of DW in the case of cycloheximide inhibition or sulfur limitation. When the cells were limited by phosphorus or nitrogen supply, the cellular starch content increased to 55% or 38% of DW, respectively, however, after about 20 h, growth of the cultures stopped producing starch, and the content of starch again decreased. Sulfur limited and cycloheximide-treated cells maintained a high content of starch (60% of DW) for up to 2 days. Sulfur limitation, the most appropriate treatment for scaled-up culture of starch-enriched biomass, was carried out in an outdoor pilot-scale experiment. After 120 h of growth in complete mineral medium, during which time the starch content reached around 18% of DW, sulfur limitation increased the starch content to 50% of DW.
650    _2
$a biomasa $7 D018533
650    _2
$a biotechnologie $x metody $7 D001709
650    _2
$a Chlorella vulgaris $x metabolismus $7 D048408
650    _2
$a mikrořasy $x metabolismus $7 D058086
650    _2
$a dusík $x metabolismus $7 D009584
650    _2
$a fosfor $x metabolismus $7 D010758
650    _2
$a fotobioreaktory $7 D058433
650    _2
$a škrob $x biosyntéza $x metabolismus $7 D013213
650    _2
$a síra $x metabolismus $7 D013455
650    _2
$a sluneční záření $7 D013472
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Maršálková, Barbora
700    1_
$a Doucha, Jiří
700    1_
$a Brányik, Tomáš
700    1_
$a Bišová, Kateřina
700    1_
$a Zachleder, Vilém
700    1_
$a Vítová, Milada
773    0_
$w MED00000795 $t Biotechnology and bioengineering $x 1097-0290 $g Roč. 108, č. 4 (2011), s. 766-76
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21404251 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m
990    __
$a 20120817 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20121206121021 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 949763 $s 785067
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2011 $b 108 $c 4 $d 766-76 $i 1097-0290 $m Biotechnology and bioengineering $n Biotechnol Bioeng $x MED00000795
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20120817/11/03

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...