• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Pulse wave as an alternate signal for data synchronization during gated myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging

O. Lang, H. Trojanova, HR. Balon, I. Kunikova, M. Bilwachs, M. Penicka, M. Kaminek, M. Myslivecek,

. 2011 ; 36 (9) : 762-6.

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc12028115

PURPOSE: Proper identification of the cardiac cycle is essential for gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. We have developed an alternate method of ECG for gating, that is, using the peripheral pulse wave (PW) as the triggering signal for gated SPECT acquisition. The aim of this study is to compare the use of this method of gating with the standard ECG trigger. METHODS: We tested the PW triggering by comparing it with the ECG trigger. We evaluated 33 patients (25 males, 8 females), average age of 61 years (39-80) referred for stress myocardial perfusion imaging. Data from all patients were acquired twice and were processed by CEqual and QGS software. We compared the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes (EDV, ESV). Paired t test and Pearson correlation coefficient were used for comparison. RESULTS: The mean LVEF, EDV, and ESV calculated with the ECG trigger were 0.52, 120, and 64, respectively, those with the pulse-wave trigger were 0.48, 126, and 71, respectively. Mean paired difference for LVEF was -0.034 (P<0.001), for EDV 5.9 (P=0.012), and for ESV 7.9 (P<0.001). Pearson correlation coefficient for LVEF was 0.955, for EDV 0.987, and for ESV 0.991 (P<0.001 for all correlations). CONCLUSION: Triggering of gated-data acquisition by the PW is feasible. Quantitative parameters of cardiac function correlate highly with those obtained from the ECG trigger and the absolute differences are not clinically significant across a wide range of values.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc12028115
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20121206125302.0
007      
ta
008      
120817s2011 xxu f 000 0#eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1097/rlu.0b013e318217aec5 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)21825844
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Lang, Otto $u Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charles University, Third Medical Faculty, Prague, Czech Republic. lang@fnkv.cz
245    10
$a Pulse wave as an alternate signal for data synchronization during gated myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging / $c O. Lang, H. Trojanova, HR. Balon, I. Kunikova, M. Bilwachs, M. Penicka, M. Kaminek, M. Myslivecek,
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: Proper identification of the cardiac cycle is essential for gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. We have developed an alternate method of ECG for gating, that is, using the peripheral pulse wave (PW) as the triggering signal for gated SPECT acquisition. The aim of this study is to compare the use of this method of gating with the standard ECG trigger. METHODS: We tested the PW triggering by comparing it with the ECG trigger. We evaluated 33 patients (25 males, 8 females), average age of 61 years (39-80) referred for stress myocardial perfusion imaging. Data from all patients were acquired twice and were processed by CEqual and QGS software. We compared the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes (EDV, ESV). Paired t test and Pearson correlation coefficient were used for comparison. RESULTS: The mean LVEF, EDV, and ESV calculated with the ECG trigger were 0.52, 120, and 64, respectively, those with the pulse-wave trigger were 0.48, 126, and 71, respectively. Mean paired difference for LVEF was -0.034 (P<0.001), for EDV 5.9 (P=0.012), and for ESV 7.9 (P<0.001). Pearson correlation coefficient for LVEF was 0.955, for EDV 0.987, and for ESV 0.991 (P<0.001 for all correlations). CONCLUSION: Triggering of gated-data acquisition by the PW is feasible. Quantitative parameters of cardiac function correlate highly with those obtained from the ECG trigger and the absolute differences are not clinically significant across a wide range of values.
650    _2
$a srdeční akcí synchronizované zobrazovací metody $x metody $7 D055424
650    _2
$a elektrokardiografie $7 D004562
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a zobrazování myokardiální perfuze $x metody $7 D055414
650    _2
$a pulz $x metody $7 D011674
650    _2
$a počítačové zpracování signálu $7 D012815
650    _2
$a tepový objem $7 D013318
650    _2
$a jednofotonová emisní výpočetní tomografie $x metody $7 D015899
650    _2
$a funkce levé komory srdeční $7 D016277
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Trojanova, Helena
700    1_
$a Balon, Helena R
700    1_
$a Kunikova, Ivana
700    1_
$a Bilwachs, Milos
700    1_
$a Penicka, Martin
700    1_
$a Kaminek, Milan
700    1_
$a Myslivecek, Miroslav
773    0_
$w MED00001147 $t Clinical nuclear medicine $x 1536-0229 $g Roč. 36, č. 9 (2011), s. 762-6
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21825844 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m
990    __
$a 20120817 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20121206125336 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 950157 $s 785461
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2011 $b 36 $c 9 $d 762-6 $i 1536-0229 $m Clinical nuclear medicine $n Clin Nucl Med $x MED00001147
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20120817/11/04

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...