Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Treatment of proximal humeral fractures - a review of current concepts enlightened by basic principles [Léčba zlomenin proximálního humeru - přehled současných přístupů s ohledem na základní principy]

D. Maier, M. Jäger, P. C. Strohm, N. P. Südkamp

. 2012 ; 79 (4) : 307-316.

Language English Country Czech Republic

Digital library NLK
Source

E-resources Online

NLK Free Medical Journals from 2006

Fractures of the proximal humerus commonly affect elderly patients. The vast majority of proximal humeral fractures result from low-energy trauma in presence of osteoporosis. Incidence of proximal humeral fractures dramatically increased over the last decades. Recent epidemiological studies expect a rather stagnant incidence. Diversity of fracture types attenuates reliability of available classification systems. Even though, predictive morphologic criteria have been detected enabling a prognostic assessment. A short or absent metaphyseal head extension and disruption of the medial periosteal hinge reliably predict ischemia of the humeral head fragment. Still, humeral head necrosis may be prevented in early reduction and fixation. The range of treatment options consists of non-operative therapy, minimal-invasive osteosynthesis, open reduction and plate fixation, intramedullary nailing and primary arthroplasty. Most proximal humeral fractures in the elderly are stable injuries and can be successfully treated by non-operative means. Operative treatment of displaced, unstable fractures should resort to the least invasive procedure providing adequate reduction and fixation stability. To date, open reduction and locking plate osteosynthesis represents the standard operative procedure in displaced three- and four-part fractures. However, a number of risk factors may promote fixation failure or impair functional outcome, most important low local bone mineral density, residual varus displacement of the humeral head, insufficient restoration of medial calcar support, humeral head ischemia and insufficient fracture reduction. Innovation of fixation techniques (e. g. angular stable locking systems and bone augmentation) will further expand indications for operative fracture treatment. Outcome of hemi-arthroplasty is closely related to anatomical tuberosity healing and restoration of rotator cuff function. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty may provide satisfactory shoulder function in geriatric patients, rotator cuff dysfunction or failure of first-line treatment. Choice of treatment should be individualized and base on careful evaluation of patient-specific, fracture-specific and surgeon-specific aspects.

Léčba zlomenin proximálního humeru - přehled současných přístupů s ohledem na základní principy

Bibliography, etc.

Literatura

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc12029592
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20121024150250.0
007      
ta
008      
120912s2012 xr fo f 000 0eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$2 doi $a 10.55095/achot2012/044
040    __
$a ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2 $b cze
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Maier, D. $u Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Dept. Orthopädie und Traumatologie, Klinik für Traumatologie Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
245    10
$a Treatment of proximal humeral fractures - a review of current concepts enlightened by basic principles / $c D. Maier, M. Jäger, P. C. Strohm, N. P. Südkamp
246    31
$a Léčba zlomenin proximálního humeru - přehled současných přístupů s ohledem na základní principy
504    __
$a Literatura $b 58
520    9_
$a Fractures of the proximal humerus commonly affect elderly patients. The vast majority of proximal humeral fractures result from low-energy trauma in presence of osteoporosis. Incidence of proximal humeral fractures dramatically increased over the last decades. Recent epidemiological studies expect a rather stagnant incidence. Diversity of fracture types attenuates reliability of available classification systems. Even though, predictive morphologic criteria have been detected enabling a prognostic assessment. A short or absent metaphyseal head extension and disruption of the medial periosteal hinge reliably predict ischemia of the humeral head fragment. Still, humeral head necrosis may be prevented in early reduction and fixation. The range of treatment options consists of non-operative therapy, minimal-invasive osteosynthesis, open reduction and plate fixation, intramedullary nailing and primary arthroplasty. Most proximal humeral fractures in the elderly are stable injuries and can be successfully treated by non-operative means. Operative treatment of displaced, unstable fractures should resort to the least invasive procedure providing adequate reduction and fixation stability. To date, open reduction and locking plate osteosynthesis represents the standard operative procedure in displaced three- and four-part fractures. However, a number of risk factors may promote fixation failure or impair functional outcome, most important low local bone mineral density, residual varus displacement of the humeral head, insufficient restoration of medial calcar support, humeral head ischemia and insufficient fracture reduction. Innovation of fixation techniques (e. g. angular stable locking systems and bone augmentation) will further expand indications for operative fracture treatment. Outcome of hemi-arthroplasty is closely related to anatomical tuberosity healing and restoration of rotator cuff function. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty may provide satisfactory shoulder function in geriatric patients, rotator cuff dysfunction or failure of first-line treatment. Choice of treatment should be individualized and base on careful evaluation of patient-specific, fracture-specific and surgeon-specific aspects.
650    _2
$a fraktury humeru $x etiologie $x chirurgie $x komplikace $x terapie $7 D006810
650    _2
$a klasifikace $7 D002965
650    _2
$a osteoporóza $7 D010024
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a vnitřní fixace fraktury $x metody $x využití $7 D005593
650    _2
$a intramedulární fixace fraktury $7 D005594
650    _2
$a ortopedické výkony $x metody $7 D019637
650    _2
$a artroplastika $x klasifikace $x metody $x využití $7 D001178
650    _2
$a incidence $7 D015994
650    _2
$a radiografie $x využití $7 D011859
650    _2
$a chirurgie operační $x metody $x využití $7 D013514
650    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma $7 D016032
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a chirurgické fixační pomůcky $x využití $7 D053831
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    _2
$a výsledky a postupy - zhodnocení (zdravotní péče) $x metody $x využití $7 D010043
650    _2
$a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
700    1_
$a Jäger, M. $u Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Dept. Orthopädie und Traumatologie, Klinik für Traumatologie Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
700    1_
$a Strohm, P. C. $u Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Dept. Orthopädie und Traumatologie, Klinik für Traumatologie Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
700    1_
$a Südkamp, N. P. $u Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Dept. Orthopädie und Traumatologie, Klinik für Traumatologie Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
773    0_
$t Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae čechoslovaca $x 0001-5415 $g Roč. 79, č. 4 (2012), s. 307-316 $w MED00011021
910    __
$a ABA008 $b A 8 $c 507 $y 2
990    __
$a 20120912072544 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20121024150455 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 951831 $s 786970
BAS    __
$a 3
BMC    __
$a 2012 $b 79 $c 4 $d 307-316 $i 0001-5415 $m Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca $n Acta chir. orthop. traumatol. Čechoslovaca $x MED00011021
LZP    __
$c NLK183 $d 20121024 $a 2012-40/ipeh

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...