-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Terlipressin in the treatment of late phase catecholamine-resistant septic shock
P. Svoboda, P. Scheer, I. Kantorová, J. Doubek, J. Dudra, M. Radvan, J. Radvanova
Jazyk angličtina Země Řecko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie, práce podpořená grantem
Grantová podpora
NR9284
MZ0
CEP - Centrální evidence projektů
PubMed
22580654
DOI
10.5754/hge10550
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- léková rezistence MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- lypresin škodlivé účinky analogy a deriváty terapeutické užití MeSH
- noradrenalin terapeutické užití MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- septický šok farmakoterapie mortalita patofyziologie MeSH
- vazokonstriktory terapeutické užití MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Norepinephrine, but also dopamine and epinephrine are recommended as first line vasopressors in the treatment of septic shock. In some patients, septic shock deteriorates and becomes to be resistant to catecholamines. In this situation, addition of vasopressin or terlipressin can be advantageous. The aim of our pilot study was to evaluate the impact of terlipressin on open label norepinephrine requirements and mortality. METHODOLOGY: In a randomized, controlled, single centre study we assigned patients with late advanced septic shock refractory to catecholamines (norepinephrine >0.6µg/kg/min for more than 24h) to receive either continuously terlipressin 4mg/24h for 72 hours in addition to open label norepinephrine (TERLI group) or to continue therapy only with catecholamines (CON group). All vasopressor infusions were titrated to maintain a target blood pressure. RESULTS: We enrolled 30 patients, of whom 13 were assigned to terlipressin and in 17 we continued in catecholamine therapy. There was no significant difference in norepinephrine consumption between the groups. Open label norepinephrine infusion rates decreased significantly in the TERLI group as compared with initial consumption, but the decrease we observed only in 7 (54%) patients. There was no significant difference between groups in the rate of death at day 28 (77% in TERLI group and 94% in CON group; p=0.18) or at day 90 (91% vs. 94%; p=0.85). CONCLUSIONS: Continuous terlipressin infusion was not effective in reducing norepinephrine consumption or in the mortality of patients, if administered in late phase of catecholamine refractory septic shock.
Hospital Trebíc Czech Republic
Trauma Hospital Brno Research Center for Traumatology and Surgery Brno Czech Republic
Traumatological Hospital Brno Research Center for Traumatology and Surgery Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12034510
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20160607124054.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 121023s2012 gr f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.5754/hge10550 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)22580654
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gr
- 100 1_
- $a Svoboda, Petr $u Trauma Hospital Brno, Research Center for Traumatology and Surgery, Brno, Czech Republic. p.svoboda@unbr.cz
- 245 10
- $a Terlipressin in the treatment of late phase catecholamine-resistant septic shock / $c P. Svoboda, P. Scheer, I. Kantorová, J. Doubek, J. Dudra, M. Radvan, J. Radvanova
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND/AIMS: Norepinephrine, but also dopamine and epinephrine are recommended as first line vasopressors in the treatment of septic shock. In some patients, septic shock deteriorates and becomes to be resistant to catecholamines. In this situation, addition of vasopressin or terlipressin can be advantageous. The aim of our pilot study was to evaluate the impact of terlipressin on open label norepinephrine requirements and mortality. METHODOLOGY: In a randomized, controlled, single centre study we assigned patients with late advanced septic shock refractory to catecholamines (norepinephrine >0.6µg/kg/min for more than 24h) to receive either continuously terlipressin 4mg/24h for 72 hours in addition to open label norepinephrine (TERLI group) or to continue therapy only with catecholamines (CON group). All vasopressor infusions were titrated to maintain a target blood pressure. RESULTS: We enrolled 30 patients, of whom 13 were assigned to terlipressin and in 17 we continued in catecholamine therapy. There was no significant difference in norepinephrine consumption between the groups. Open label norepinephrine infusion rates decreased significantly in the TERLI group as compared with initial consumption, but the decrease we observed only in 7 (54%) patients. There was no significant difference between groups in the rate of death at day 28 (77% in TERLI group and 94% in CON group; p=0.18) or at day 90 (91% vs. 94%; p=0.85). CONCLUSIONS: Continuous terlipressin infusion was not effective in reducing norepinephrine consumption or in the mortality of patients, if administered in late phase of catecholamine refractory septic shock.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
- 650 _2
- $a léková rezistence $7 D004351
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a lypresin $x škodlivé účinky $x analogy a deriváty $x terapeutické užití $7 D008236
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a noradrenalin $x terapeutické užití $7 D009638
- 650 _2
- $a septický šok $x farmakoterapie $x mortalita $x patofyziologie $7 D012772
- 650 _2
- $a vazokonstriktory $x terapeutické užití $7 D014662
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Scheer, Peter, $d 1973- $7 xx0033760 $u Department of Physiology, Faculty of Veterina ry Medicine, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Science Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Kantorová, Ilona $7 xx0060603 $u Traumatological Hospital Brno, Research Center for Traumatology and Surgery, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Doubek, Jaroslav, $d 1947- $7 mzk2003185823 $u Department of Physiology, Faculty of Veterina ry Medicine, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Science Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Dudra, Jan
- 700 1_
- $a Radvan, Martin $7 xx0137562 $u Hospital Trebíc, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Radvanová, Jana $7 xx0137564 $u Hospital Trebíc, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002025 $t Hepato-gastroenterology $x 0172-6390 $g Roč. 59, č. 116 (2012), s. 1043-1047
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22580654 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20121023 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20160607123829 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 956520 $s 792007
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2012 $b 59 $c 116 $d 1043-1047 $i 0172-6390 $m Hepato-gastroenterology $n Hepatogastroenterology $x MED00002025
- GRA __
- $a NR9284 $p MZ0
- LZP __
- $b NLK112 $a Pubmed-20121023