Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Terlipressin in the treatment of late phase catecholamine-resistant septic shock

P. Svoboda, P. Scheer, I. Kantorová, J. Doubek, J. Dudra, M. Radvan, J. Radvanova

. 2012 ; 59 (116) : 1043-1047.

Jazyk angličtina Země Řecko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc12034510

Grantová podpora
NR9284 MZ0 CEP - Centrální evidence projektů

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Norepinephrine, but also dopamine and epinephrine are recommended as first line vasopressors in the treatment of septic shock. In some patients, septic shock deteriorates and becomes to be resistant to catecholamines. In this situation, addition of vasopressin or terlipressin can be advantageous. The aim of our pilot study was to evaluate the impact of terlipressin on open label norepinephrine requirements and mortality. METHODOLOGY: In a randomized, controlled, single centre study we assigned patients with late advanced septic shock refractory to catecholamines (norepinephrine >0.6µg/kg/min for more than 24h) to receive either continuously terlipressin 4mg/24h for 72 hours in addition to open label norepinephrine (TERLI group) or to continue therapy only with catecholamines (CON group). All vasopressor infusions were titrated to maintain a target blood pressure. RESULTS: We enrolled 30 patients, of whom 13 were assigned to terlipressin and in 17 we continued in catecholamine therapy. There was no significant difference in norepinephrine consumption between the groups. Open label norepinephrine infusion rates decreased significantly in the TERLI group as compared with initial consumption, but the decrease we observed only in 7 (54%) patients. There was no significant difference between groups in the rate of death at day 28 (77% in TERLI group and 94% in CON group; p=0.18) or at day 90 (91% vs. 94%; p=0.85). CONCLUSIONS: Continuous terlipressin infusion was not effective in reducing norepinephrine consumption or in the mortality of patients, if administered in late phase of catecholamine refractory septic shock.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc12034510
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20160607124054.0
007      
ta
008      
121023s2012 gr f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.5754/hge10550 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)22580654
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gr
100    1_
$a Svoboda, Petr $u Trauma Hospital Brno, Research Center for Traumatology and Surgery, Brno, Czech Republic. p.svoboda@unbr.cz
245    10
$a Terlipressin in the treatment of late phase catecholamine-resistant septic shock / $c P. Svoboda, P. Scheer, I. Kantorová, J. Doubek, J. Dudra, M. Radvan, J. Radvanova
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND/AIMS: Norepinephrine, but also dopamine and epinephrine are recommended as first line vasopressors in the treatment of septic shock. In some patients, septic shock deteriorates and becomes to be resistant to catecholamines. In this situation, addition of vasopressin or terlipressin can be advantageous. The aim of our pilot study was to evaluate the impact of terlipressin on open label norepinephrine requirements and mortality. METHODOLOGY: In a randomized, controlled, single centre study we assigned patients with late advanced septic shock refractory to catecholamines (norepinephrine >0.6µg/kg/min for more than 24h) to receive either continuously terlipressin 4mg/24h for 72 hours in addition to open label norepinephrine (TERLI group) or to continue therapy only with catecholamines (CON group). All vasopressor infusions were titrated to maintain a target blood pressure. RESULTS: We enrolled 30 patients, of whom 13 were assigned to terlipressin and in 17 we continued in catecholamine therapy. There was no significant difference in norepinephrine consumption between the groups. Open label norepinephrine infusion rates decreased significantly in the TERLI group as compared with initial consumption, but the decrease we observed only in 7 (54%) patients. There was no significant difference between groups in the rate of death at day 28 (77% in TERLI group and 94% in CON group; p=0.18) or at day 90 (91% vs. 94%; p=0.85). CONCLUSIONS: Continuous terlipressin infusion was not effective in reducing norepinephrine consumption or in the mortality of patients, if administered in late phase of catecholamine refractory septic shock.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a léková rezistence $7 D004351
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a lypresin $x škodlivé účinky $x analogy a deriváty $x terapeutické užití $7 D008236
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a noradrenalin $x terapeutické užití $7 D009638
650    _2
$a septický šok $x farmakoterapie $x mortalita $x patofyziologie $7 D012772
650    _2
$a vazokonstriktory $x terapeutické užití $7 D014662
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Scheer, Peter, $d 1973- $7 xx0033760 $u Department of Physiology, Faculty of Veterina ry Medicine, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Science Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kantorová, Ilona $7 xx0060603 $u Traumatological Hospital Brno, Research Center for Traumatology and Surgery, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Doubek, Jaroslav, $d 1947- $7 mzk2003185823 $u Department of Physiology, Faculty of Veterina ry Medicine, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Science Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Dudra, Jan
700    1_
$a Radvan, Martin $7 xx0137562 $u Hospital Trebíc, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Radvanová, Jana $7 xx0137564 $u Hospital Trebíc, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00002025 $t Hepato-gastroenterology $x 0172-6390 $g Roč. 59, č. 116 (2012), s. 1043-1047
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22580654 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20121023 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20160607123829 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 956520 $s 792007
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2012 $b 59 $c 116 $d 1043-1047 $i 0172-6390 $m Hepato-gastroenterology $n Hepatogastroenterology $x MED00002025
GRA    __
$a NR9284 $p MZ0
LZP    __
$b NLK112 $a Pubmed-20121023

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...