Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Patient and physician perception of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic appendectomy

Tomas Hucl, Adela Saglova, Marek Benes, Matej Kocik, Martin Oliverius, Zdenek Valenta, Julius Spicak

. 2012 ; 18 (15) : 1800-1805.

Jazyk angličtina Země Tchaj-wan

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc12034530

Grantová podpora
NT11236 MZ0 CEP - Centrální evidence projektů

AIM: To investigate perception of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) as a potential technique for appendectomy. METHODS: One hundred patients undergoing endoscopy and 100 physicians were given a questionnaire describing in detail the techniques of NOTES and laparoscopic appendectomy. They were asked about the reasons for their preference, choice of orifice, and extent of complication risk they were willing to accept. RESULTS: Fifty patients (50%) and only 21 physicians (21%) preferred NOTES (P < 0.001). Patients had previously heard of NOTES less frequently (7% vs 73%, P < 0.001) and had undergone endoscopy more frequently (88% vs 36%, P < 0.001) than physicians. Absence of hernia was the most common reason for NOTES preference in physicians (80% vs 44%, P = 0.003), whereas reduced pain was the most common reason in patients (66% vs 52%). Physicians were more likely to refuse NOTES as a novel and unsure technique (P < 0.001) and having an increased risk of infection (P < 0.001). The preferred access site in both groups was colon followed by stomach, with vagina being rarely preferred. In multivariable modeling, those with high-school education [odds ratio (OR): 2.68, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.23-5.83] and prior colonoscopy (OR: 2.10, 95% CI: 1.05-4.19) were more likely to prefer NOTES over laparoscopic appendectomy. There was a steep decline in NOTES preference with increased rate of procedural complications. Male patients were more likely to consent to their wives vaginal NOTES appendectomy than male physicians (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The preference of NOTES for appendectomy was greater in patients than physicians and was related to reduced pain and absence of hernia rather than lack of scarring.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc12034530
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20200505133336.0
007      
ta
008      
121023s2012 ch f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3748/wjg.v18.i15.1800 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)22553405
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ch
100    1_
$a Hucl, Tomáš $7 xx0077546 $u Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 14021 Prague, Czech Republic. tomas.hucl@ikem.cz
245    10
$a Patient and physician perception of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic appendectomy / $c Tomas Hucl, Adela Saglova, Marek Benes, Matej Kocik, Martin Oliverius, Zdenek Valenta, Julius Spicak
520    9_
$a AIM: To investigate perception of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) as a potential technique for appendectomy. METHODS: One hundred patients undergoing endoscopy and 100 physicians were given a questionnaire describing in detail the techniques of NOTES and laparoscopic appendectomy. They were asked about the reasons for their preference, choice of orifice, and extent of complication risk they were willing to accept. RESULTS: Fifty patients (50%) and only 21 physicians (21%) preferred NOTES (P < 0.001). Patients had previously heard of NOTES less frequently (7% vs 73%, P < 0.001) and had undergone endoscopy more frequently (88% vs 36%, P < 0.001) than physicians. Absence of hernia was the most common reason for NOTES preference in physicians (80% vs 44%, P = 0.003), whereas reduced pain was the most common reason in patients (66% vs 52%). Physicians were more likely to refuse NOTES as a novel and unsure technique (P < 0.001) and having an increased risk of infection (P < 0.001). The preferred access site in both groups was colon followed by stomach, with vagina being rarely preferred. In multivariable modeling, those with high-school education [odds ratio (OR): 2.68, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.23-5.83] and prior colonoscopy (OR: 2.10, 95% CI: 1.05-4.19) were more likely to prefer NOTES over laparoscopic appendectomy. There was a steep decline in NOTES preference with increased rate of procedural complications. Male patients were more likely to consent to their wives vaginal NOTES appendectomy than male physicians (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The preference of NOTES for appendectomy was greater in patients than physicians and was related to reduced pain and absence of hernia rather than lack of scarring.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a apendektomie $x metody $7 D001062
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a laparoskopie $7 D010535
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a endoskopické operace přirozenými otvory $x metody $7 D057605
650    _2
$a pacientova volba $7 D057240
650    _2
$a percepce $7 D010465
650    _2
$a průzkumy a dotazníky $7 D011795
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Pulkertová, Adéla $7 xx0129501 $u Hepatology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 14021 Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Beneš, Marek. $7 xx0195208 $u Hepatology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 14021 Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kočík, Matěj. $7 xx0244088 $u Department of Transplantation Surgery, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 14021 Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Oliverius, Martin $7 xx0106430 $u Department of Transplantation Surgery, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 14021 Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Valenta, Zdeněk, $d 1955- $7 xx0074213 $u Department of Medical Informatics, Institute of Computer Science AS CR, 18207 Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Špičák, Julius, $d 1952- $7 jn20000919536 $u Hepatology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 14021 Prague, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00006918 $t World journal of gastroenterology WJG $x 1007-9327 $g Roč. 18, č. 15 (2012), s. 1800-1805
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22553405 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20121023 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20200505133334 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 956540 $s 792027
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2012 $b 18 $c 15 $d 1800-1805 $i 1007-9327 $m World journal of gastroenterology $n World J Gastroenterol $x MED00006918
GRA    __
$a NT11236 $p MZ0
LZP    __
$b NLK112 $a Pubmed-20121023

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...