-
Something wrong with this record ?
Reproduction after myomectomy: comparison of patients with and without second-look laparoscopy
Kristyna Kubinova, Michal Mara, Petr Horak, David Kuzel, Alena Dohnalova
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Grant support
NS9798
MZ0
CEP Register
Digital library NLK
Full text - Article
Source
NLK
CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCOhost)
from 2008-02-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2001-01-01 to 1 year ago
- MeSH
- Tissue Adhesions complications epidemiology etiology MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Hysteroscopy methods MeSH
- Laparoscopy methods MeSH
- Leiomyoma surgery MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Uterine Neoplasms surgery MeSH
- Follow-Up Studies MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Pregnancy Rate MeSH
- Infertility, Female epidemiology etiology MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
Myomectomy is associated with a high risk of de-novo adhesion formation that may decrease fertility. The purpose of this study was to compare the reproductive outcome of patients after laparoscopic or open myomectomy who underwent second-look (SL) hysteroscopy and laparoscopy including adhesiolysis with patients with no SL intervention. A total of 170 patients underwent open or laparoscopic myomectomy at one centre. All patients were recommended SL. Reproductive results were analyzed in 12 and 24 months intervals following myomectomy. Out of 170 post-myomectomy patients 96 signed informed consent with SL (group A) and 74 withheld (group B). The cumulative pregnancy rate in the 24-months follow-up was: 61.4% and 66.7% (p = 0.535) in group A and group B respectively. Adhesions of adnexa were observed and lysed in the overall of 34.0% of patients at the time of SL. Intrauterine synechiae were present in 1.56% of patients at the SL hysteroscopy. No case of uterine rupture during pregnancy or delivery was recorded. Our results show that the pregnancy rate of patients after myomectomy who underwent SL hysteroscopy and laparoscopy is similar to that of patients with no SL procedure. Adhesiolysis performed during SL does not seem to improve the reproductive outcome of post-myomectomy patients.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12034928
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20160703105256.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 121023s2012 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3109/13645706.2011.573797 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)21745136
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Kubínová, Kristýna $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Charles University, First Faculty of Medicine and General Faculty Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. kristynakubinova@gmail.com $7 xx0106890
- 245 10
- $a Reproduction after myomectomy: comparison of patients with and without second-look laparoscopy / $c Kristyna Kubinova, Michal Mara, Petr Horak, David Kuzel, Alena Dohnalova
- 520 9_
- $a Myomectomy is associated with a high risk of de-novo adhesion formation that may decrease fertility. The purpose of this study was to compare the reproductive outcome of patients after laparoscopic or open myomectomy who underwent second-look (SL) hysteroscopy and laparoscopy including adhesiolysis with patients with no SL intervention. A total of 170 patients underwent open or laparoscopic myomectomy at one centre. All patients were recommended SL. Reproductive results were analyzed in 12 and 24 months intervals following myomectomy. Out of 170 post-myomectomy patients 96 signed informed consent with SL (group A) and 74 withheld (group B). The cumulative pregnancy rate in the 24-months follow-up was: 61.4% and 66.7% (p = 0.535) in group A and group B respectively. Adhesions of adnexa were observed and lysed in the overall of 34.0% of patients at the time of SL. Intrauterine synechiae were present in 1.56% of patients at the SL hysteroscopy. No case of uterine rupture during pregnancy or delivery was recorded. Our results show that the pregnancy rate of patients after myomectomy who underwent SL hysteroscopy and laparoscopy is similar to that of patients with no SL procedure. Adhesiolysis performed during SL does not seem to improve the reproductive outcome of post-myomectomy patients.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a následné studie $7 D005500
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a hysteroskopie $x metody $7 D015907
- 650 _2
- $a ženská infertilita $x epidemiologie $x etiologie $7 D007247
- 650 _2
- $a laparoskopie $x metody $7 D010535
- 650 _2
- $a leiomyom $x chirurgie $7 D007889
- 650 _2
- $a těhotenství $7 D011247
- 650 _2
- $a úhrn těhotenství na počet žen v reprodukčním věku $7 D018873
- 650 _2
- $a adheze tkání $x komplikace $x epidemiologie $x etiologie $7 D000267
- 650 _2
- $a nádory dělohy $x chirurgie $7 D014594
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Mára, Michal, $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Charles University, First Faculty of Medicine and General Faculty Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic $d 1970- $7 xx0062099
- 700 1_
- $a Horák, Petr $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Charles University, First Faculty of Medicine and General Faculty Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic $7 xx0099420
- 700 1_
- $a Kužel, David, $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Charles University, First Faculty of Medicine and General Faculty Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic $d 1954- $7 nlk19990073454
- 700 1_
- $a Dohnalová, Alena $u Department of Physiology and Biostatistics, Charles University, First Faculty of Medicine and General Faculty Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic $7 xx0062948
- 773 0_
- $w MED00003375 $t Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies MITAT official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy $x 1365-2931 $g Roč. 21, č. 2 (2012), s. 118-124
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21745136 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20121023 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20160703105042 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 956938 $s 792425
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2012 $b 21 $c 2 $d 118-124 $i 1365-2931 $m Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies $n Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol $x MED00003375
- GRA __
- $a NS9798 $p MZ0
- LZP __
- $b NLK112 $a Pubmed-20121023