-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Analysis of covalent ellipticine- and doxorubicin-derived adducts in DNA of neuroblastoma cells by the ³²P-postlabeling technique
M. Stiborova, J. Poljakova, T. Eckschlager, R. Kizek, E. Frei
Jazyk angličtina Země Česko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2001
Free Medical Journals
od 1998
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2007-06-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2001
- MeSH
- adukty DNA analýza MeSH
- antitumorózní látky farmakologie MeSH
- doxorubicin farmakologie MeSH
- elipticiny farmakologie MeSH
- izotopové značení MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádorové buněčné linie MeSH
- neuroblastom metabolismus MeSH
- radioizotopy fosforu MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
BACKGROUND: Ellipticine and doxorubicin are antineoplastic agents, whose action is based mainly on DNA damage such as intercalation, inhibition of topoisomerase II and formation of covalent DNA adducts. The key target to resolve which of these mechanisms are responsible for ellipticine and doxorubicin anticancer effects is the development of suitable methods for identifying their individual DNA-damaging effects. Here, the (32)P-postlabeling method was tested to detect covalent DNA adducts formed by ellipticine and doxorubicin. METHODS: The standard procedure of (32)P-postlabeling assay, this procedure under ATP-deficient conditions, the version using extraction of adducts with n-butanol and the nuclease P1 enrichment version were used to analyze ellipticineand/ or doxorubicin-derived DNA adducts. RESULTS: Two covalent ellipticine-derived DNA adducts, which are associated with cytotoxicity of ellipticine to human UKF-NB-3 and UKF-NB-4 neuroblastoma cell lines, were detected by the (32)P-postlabeling method. These adducts are identical to those formed by the ellipticine metabolites, 13-hydroxy- and 12-hydroxyellipticine. In contrast, no covalent adducts formed by doxorubicin in DNA of these neuroblastoma cells and in DNA incubated with this drug and formaldehyde in vitro were detectable by the (32)P-postlabeling assay. CONCLUSIONS: The results presented in this paper are the first to demonstrate that in contrast to covalent DNA adducts formed by ellipticine, the adducts generated by formaldehyde-mediated covalent binding of doxorubicin to DNA are not detectable by the (32)P-postlabeling assay. No DNA adducts were, detectable either in vitro, in incubations of DNA with doxorubicin or in DNA of neuroblastoma cells treated with this drug. The results also suggest that covalent binding of ellipticine to DNA of UKF-NB-3 and UKF-NB-4 neuroblastoma cell lines is the predominant mechanism responsible for the cytotoxicity of this drug. To understand the mechanisms of doxorubicin anticancer effects on neuroblastoma cells, development of novel methods for identifying covalent doxorubicin-derived DNA adducts is the major challenge for further research.
Central European Institute of Technology Brno University of Technology
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry faculty of Agronomy Mendel University in Brno
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12039729
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20140324112539.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 121217s2012 xr d f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.5507/bp.2012.043 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)22837132
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Stiborová, Marie, $d 1950-2020 $7 jo2005259907 $u Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Albertov 2030, 128 40 Prague 2, Czech Republic. marie.stiborova@natur.cuni.cz
- 245 10
- $a Analysis of covalent ellipticine- and doxorubicin-derived adducts in DNA of neuroblastoma cells by the ³²P-postlabeling technique / $c M. Stiborova, J. Poljakova, T. Eckschlager, R. Kizek, E. Frei
- 520 9
- $a BACKGROUND: Ellipticine and doxorubicin are antineoplastic agents, whose action is based mainly on DNA damage such as intercalation, inhibition of topoisomerase II and formation of covalent DNA adducts. The key target to resolve which of these mechanisms are responsible for ellipticine and doxorubicin anticancer effects is the development of suitable methods for identifying their individual DNA-damaging effects. Here, the (32)P-postlabeling method was tested to detect covalent DNA adducts formed by ellipticine and doxorubicin. METHODS: The standard procedure of (32)P-postlabeling assay, this procedure under ATP-deficient conditions, the version using extraction of adducts with n-butanol and the nuclease P1 enrichment version were used to analyze ellipticineand/ or doxorubicin-derived DNA adducts. RESULTS: Two covalent ellipticine-derived DNA adducts, which are associated with cytotoxicity of ellipticine to human UKF-NB-3 and UKF-NB-4 neuroblastoma cell lines, were detected by the (32)P-postlabeling method. These adducts are identical to those formed by the ellipticine metabolites, 13-hydroxy- and 12-hydroxyellipticine. In contrast, no covalent adducts formed by doxorubicin in DNA of these neuroblastoma cells and in DNA incubated with this drug and formaldehyde in vitro were detectable by the (32)P-postlabeling assay. CONCLUSIONS: The results presented in this paper are the first to demonstrate that in contrast to covalent DNA adducts formed by ellipticine, the adducts generated by formaldehyde-mediated covalent binding of doxorubicin to DNA are not detectable by the (32)P-postlabeling assay. No DNA adducts were, detectable either in vitro, in incubations of DNA with doxorubicin or in DNA of neuroblastoma cells treated with this drug. The results also suggest that covalent binding of ellipticine to DNA of UKF-NB-3 and UKF-NB-4 neuroblastoma cell lines is the predominant mechanism responsible for the cytotoxicity of this drug. To understand the mechanisms of doxorubicin anticancer effects on neuroblastoma cells, development of novel methods for identifying covalent doxorubicin-derived DNA adducts is the major challenge for further research.
- 650 _2
- $a antitumorózní látky $x farmakologie $7 D000970
- 650 _2
- $a nádorové buněčné linie $7 D045744
- 650 _2
- $a adukty DNA $x analýza $7 D018736
- 650 _2
- $a doxorubicin $x farmakologie $7 D004317
- 650 _2
- $a elipticiny $x farmakologie $7 D004611
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a izotopové značení $7 D007553
- 650 _2
- $a neuroblastom $x metabolismus $7 D009447
- 650 _2
- $a radioizotopy fosforu $7 D010761
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Poljaková, Jitka $7 xx0101980 $u Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Albertov 2030, 128 40 Prague 2, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Eckschlager, Tomáš, $d 1956- $7 jn20000400613 $u Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, 2nd Medical School, Charles University and University Hospital Motol
- 700 1_
- $a Kizek, René, $d 1972- $7 jn20001005291 $u Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, faculty of Agronomy, Mendel University in Brno; Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology
- 700 1_
- $a Frei, Eva. $7 _AN036392 $u Division of Preventive Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Germany
- 773 0_
- $w MED00012606 $t Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacký, Olomouc, Czech Republic $x 1213-8118 $g Roč. 156, č. 2 (2012), s. 115-121
- 856 41
- $u http://biomed.papers.upol.cz/magno/bio/2012/mn2.php $y domovská stránka časopisu - plný text volně přístupný = fulltext
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b A 1502 $c 958 $y 4 $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20121217 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20140324112611 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 963281 $s 797317
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2012 $b 156 $c 2 $d 115-121 $i 1213-8118 $m Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacký, Olomouc Czech Republic $n Biomed. Pap. Fac. Med. Palacký Univ. Olomouc Czech Repub. (Print) $x MED00012606
- LZP __
- $b NLK138 $a Pubmed-20121217