• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Analysis of covalent ellipticine- and doxorubicin-derived adducts in DNA of neuroblastoma cells by the ³²P-postlabeling technique

M. Stiborova, J. Poljakova, T. Eckschlager, R. Kizek, E. Frei

. 2012 ; 156 (2) : 115-121.

Jazyk angličtina Země Česko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc12039729

BACKGROUND: Ellipticine and doxorubicin are antineoplastic agents, whose action is based mainly on DNA damage such as intercalation, inhibition of topoisomerase II and formation of covalent DNA adducts. The key target to resolve which of these mechanisms are responsible for ellipticine and doxorubicin anticancer effects is the development of suitable methods for identifying their individual DNA-damaging effects. Here, the (32)P-postlabeling method was tested to detect covalent DNA adducts formed by ellipticine and doxorubicin. METHODS: The standard procedure of (32)P-postlabeling assay, this procedure under ATP-deficient conditions, the version using extraction of adducts with n-butanol and the nuclease P1 enrichment version were used to analyze ellipticineand/ or doxorubicin-derived DNA adducts. RESULTS: Two covalent ellipticine-derived DNA adducts, which are associated with cytotoxicity of ellipticine to human UKF-NB-3 and UKF-NB-4 neuroblastoma cell lines, were detected by the (32)P-postlabeling method. These adducts are identical to those formed by the ellipticine metabolites, 13-hydroxy- and 12-hydroxyellipticine. In contrast, no covalent adducts formed by doxorubicin in DNA of these neuroblastoma cells and in DNA incubated with this drug and formaldehyde in vitro were detectable by the (32)P-postlabeling assay. CONCLUSIONS: The results presented in this paper are the first to demonstrate that in contrast to covalent DNA adducts formed by ellipticine, the adducts generated by formaldehyde-mediated covalent binding of doxorubicin to DNA are not detectable by the (32)P-postlabeling assay. No DNA adducts were, detectable either in vitro, in incubations of DNA with doxorubicin or in DNA of neuroblastoma cells treated with this drug. The results also suggest that covalent binding of ellipticine to DNA of UKF-NB-3 and UKF-NB-4 neuroblastoma cell lines is the predominant mechanism responsible for the cytotoxicity of this drug. To understand the mechanisms of doxorubicin anticancer effects on neuroblastoma cells, development of novel methods for identifying covalent doxorubicin-derived DNA adducts is the major challenge for further research.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc12039729
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20140324112539.0
007      
ta
008      
121217s2012 xr d f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.5507/bp.2012.043 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)22837132
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Stiborová, Marie, $d 1950-2020 $7 jo2005259907 $u Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Albertov 2030, 128 40 Prague 2, Czech Republic. marie.stiborova@natur.cuni.cz
245    10
$a Analysis of covalent ellipticine- and doxorubicin-derived adducts in DNA of neuroblastoma cells by the ³²P-postlabeling technique / $c M. Stiborova, J. Poljakova, T. Eckschlager, R. Kizek, E. Frei
520    9
$a BACKGROUND: Ellipticine and doxorubicin are antineoplastic agents, whose action is based mainly on DNA damage such as intercalation, inhibition of topoisomerase II and formation of covalent DNA adducts. The key target to resolve which of these mechanisms are responsible for ellipticine and doxorubicin anticancer effects is the development of suitable methods for identifying their individual DNA-damaging effects. Here, the (32)P-postlabeling method was tested to detect covalent DNA adducts formed by ellipticine and doxorubicin. METHODS: The standard procedure of (32)P-postlabeling assay, this procedure under ATP-deficient conditions, the version using extraction of adducts with n-butanol and the nuclease P1 enrichment version were used to analyze ellipticineand/ or doxorubicin-derived DNA adducts. RESULTS: Two covalent ellipticine-derived DNA adducts, which are associated with cytotoxicity of ellipticine to human UKF-NB-3 and UKF-NB-4 neuroblastoma cell lines, were detected by the (32)P-postlabeling method. These adducts are identical to those formed by the ellipticine metabolites, 13-hydroxy- and 12-hydroxyellipticine. In contrast, no covalent adducts formed by doxorubicin in DNA of these neuroblastoma cells and in DNA incubated with this drug and formaldehyde in vitro were detectable by the (32)P-postlabeling assay. CONCLUSIONS: The results presented in this paper are the first to demonstrate that in contrast to covalent DNA adducts formed by ellipticine, the adducts generated by formaldehyde-mediated covalent binding of doxorubicin to DNA are not detectable by the (32)P-postlabeling assay. No DNA adducts were, detectable either in vitro, in incubations of DNA with doxorubicin or in DNA of neuroblastoma cells treated with this drug. The results also suggest that covalent binding of ellipticine to DNA of UKF-NB-3 and UKF-NB-4 neuroblastoma cell lines is the predominant mechanism responsible for the cytotoxicity of this drug. To understand the mechanisms of doxorubicin anticancer effects on neuroblastoma cells, development of novel methods for identifying covalent doxorubicin-derived DNA adducts is the major challenge for further research.
650    _2
$a antitumorózní látky $x farmakologie $7 D000970
650    _2
$a nádorové buněčné linie $7 D045744
650    _2
$a adukty DNA $x analýza $7 D018736
650    _2
$a doxorubicin $x farmakologie $7 D004317
650    _2
$a elipticiny $x farmakologie $7 D004611
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a izotopové značení $7 D007553
650    _2
$a neuroblastom $x metabolismus $7 D009447
650    _2
$a radioizotopy fosforu $7 D010761
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Poljaková, Jitka $7 xx0101980 $u Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Albertov 2030, 128 40 Prague 2, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Eckschlager, Tomáš, $d 1956- $7 jn20000400613 $u Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, 2nd Medical School, Charles University and University Hospital Motol
700    1_
$a Kizek, René, $d 1972- $7 jn20001005291 $u Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, faculty of Agronomy, Mendel University in Brno; Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology
700    1_
$a Frei, Eva. $7 _AN036392 $u Division of Preventive Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Germany
773    0_
$w MED00012606 $t Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacký, Olomouc, Czech Republic $x 1213-8118 $g Roč. 156, č. 2 (2012), s. 115-121
856    41
$u http://biomed.papers.upol.cz/magno/bio/2012/mn2.php $y domovská stránka časopisu - plný text volně přístupný = fulltext
910    __
$a ABA008 $b A 1502 $c 958 $y 4 $z 0
990    __
$a 20121217 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20140324112611 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 963281 $s 797317
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2012 $b 156 $c 2 $d 115-121 $i 1213-8118 $m Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacký, Olomouc Czech Republic $n Biomed. Pap. Fac. Med. Palacký Univ. Olomouc Czech Repub. (Print) $x MED00012606
LZP    __
$b NLK138 $a Pubmed-20121217

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...