Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

If two do the same thing-- comparing IHE Profiles PIX/PDQ based nn HL7 2.x and HL7 version 3

Marek Václavík

. 2012 ; 8 (4) : 40-43.

Language English Country Czech Republic Media elektronický zdroj

Background: IHE integration profiles for managing patient identification, PIX and PDQ, exist in two alternative forms: on the one hand using HL7 2.x, on the other hand based on HL7 Version 3. Objective: Knowing difierences between the competing integration profiles shall assist the user to choose the one better suitable for their specific deployment. Methods: Difierences in the set of interactions, the information model, the vocabulary and the required behavior of individual interactions were analyzed. Results: A list of specific features and constraints for each of the integration profiles was compiled. Conclusions: Not all of the identified deltas originate in the inherent incompatibility between HL7 2.x and 3.0, they also result from the specific constraints imposed by the IHE profile. Identified disparities include the communication pattern, constraints to identifier schemas and pseudonymization capabilities.

If two do the same thing-- comparing IHE Profiles PIX/PDQ based nn HL7 2.x and HL7 version 3 [elektronický zdroj] /

References provided by Crossref.org

Obsahuje 2 tabulky

Bibliography, etc.

Literatura

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc13000325
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20130204135830.0
007      
cr|cn|
008      
130104s2012 xr fs 000 0eng||
009      
eAR
024    7_
$a 10.24105/ejbi.2012.08.4.8 $2 doi
040    __
$a ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2 $b cze
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Václavík, Marek $u SER HealthCare Solutions, Germany
245    10
$a If two do the same thing-- comparing IHE Profiles PIX/PDQ based nn HL7 2.x and HL7 version 3 $h [elektronický zdroj] / $c Marek Václavík
500    __
$a Obsahuje 2 tabulky
504    __
$a Literatura $b 8
520    9_
$a Background: IHE integration profiles for managing patient identification, PIX and PDQ, exist in two alternative forms: on the one hand using HL7 2.x, on the other hand based on HL7 Version 3. Objective: Knowing difierences between the competing integration profiles shall assist the user to choose the one better suitable for their specific deployment. Methods: Difierences in the set of interactions, the information model, the vocabulary and the required behavior of individual interactions were analyzed. Results: A list of specific features and constraints for each of the integration profiles was compiled. Conclusions: Not all of the identified deltas originate in the inherent incompatibility between HL7 2.x and 3.0, they also result from the specific constraints imposed by the IHE profile. Identified disparities include the communication pattern, constraints to identifier schemas and pseudonymization capabilities.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a lékařská informatika $7 D008490
650    _2
$a referenční standardy $7 D012015
650    12
$a informační systémy $7 D007256
650    _2
$a software $7 D012984
773    0_
$t European journal for biomedical informatics $x 1801-5603 $g Roč. 8, č. 4 (2012), s. 40-43 $w MED00173462
856    41
$u http://www.ejbi.org/img/ejbi/2012/4/Vaclavik_en.pdf $y plný text volně přístupný
910    __
$a ABA008 $y 3 $z 0
990    __
$a 20130104083259 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20130204140002 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 963062 $s 798484
BAS    __
$a 3 $a 4
BMC    __
$a 2012 $b 8 $c 4 $d 40-43 $i 1801-5603 $m European Journal for Biomedical Informatics $n Eur. J. Biomed. Inform. (Praha) $x MED00173462
LZP    __
$c NLK183 $d 20130204 $a NLK 2013-01/vt

Find record

Citation metrics

Logged in users only

Archiving options

Loading data ...