• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Development of implant stability during early healing of immediately loaded implants

A. Simunek, D. Kopecka, T. Brazda, I. Strnad, L. Capek, R. Slezak

. 2012 ; 27 (3) : 619-27.

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc13000794

PURPOSE: To monitor the development of stability of immediately loaded implants during early healing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 90 interforaminally placed implants with an alkali-treated surface were considered. The stability of each implant was examined at placement and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, and 10 weeks after the surgery using resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and damping capacity measurement. The development of implant stability, focusing on the decrease in stability (as measured by implant stability quotient [ISQ]) and the interplay of primary (ISQ0) and secondary implant stability, was evaluated. The implants were divided into three groups based on primary stability: group L (ISQ0 < 68), group M (ISQ0 68 to72), and group H (ISQ0 > 72). Stability curves for each group were created and analyzed statistically. Implant stability measurement results gained with RFA and damping capacity were compared employing the Wilcoxon paired test, correlation coefficients, and regression analysis. The threshold for statistical significance was set at P < .05. RESULTS: The most pronounced decrease in ISQ values occurred 1 week after implant placement (mean decrease of 2.2 ISQ). During the 10-week experiment, mean ISQ rose by 5.5 in group L and by 1.3 in group M and dropped by 1.8 in group H (P < .001). The coefficient of determination R2 = 0.06 showed a weak dependence of RFA on the damping capacity (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Implants with low primary stability showed a significant increase in stability during healing. In contrast, implants with high primary stability lost some stability over time.

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc13000794
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20130414201839.0
007      
ta
008      
130108s2012 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
035    __
$a (PubMed)22616056
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Šimůnek, Antonín, $d 1953- $7 nlk19990074122 $u Department of Dentistry, Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic. simunek@email.cz
245    10
$a Development of implant stability during early healing of immediately loaded implants / $c A. Simunek, D. Kopecka, T. Brazda, I. Strnad, L. Capek, R. Slezak
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: To monitor the development of stability of immediately loaded implants during early healing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 90 interforaminally placed implants with an alkali-treated surface were considered. The stability of each implant was examined at placement and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, and 10 weeks after the surgery using resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and damping capacity measurement. The development of implant stability, focusing on the decrease in stability (as measured by implant stability quotient [ISQ]) and the interplay of primary (ISQ0) and secondary implant stability, was evaluated. The implants were divided into three groups based on primary stability: group L (ISQ0 < 68), group M (ISQ0 68 to72), and group H (ISQ0 > 72). Stability curves for each group were created and analyzed statistically. Implant stability measurement results gained with RFA and damping capacity were compared employing the Wilcoxon paired test, correlation coefficients, and regression analysis. The threshold for statistical significance was set at P < .05. RESULTS: The most pronounced decrease in ISQ values occurred 1 week after implant placement (mean decrease of 2.2 ISQ). During the 10-week experiment, mean ISQ rose by 5.5 in group L and by 1.3 in group M and dropped by 1.8 in group H (P < .001). The coefficient of determination R2 = 0.06 showed a weak dependence of RFA on the damping capacity (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Implants with low primary stability showed a significant increase in stability during healing. In contrast, implants with high primary stability lost some stability over time.
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a endoseální implantace zubů $x metody $7 D003758
650    _2
$a zubní implantáty $7 D015921
650    _2
$a zubní protéza - design $7 D017267
650    _2
$a retence zubní protézy $7 D017268
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a okamžité zatížení zubního implantátu $7 D057893
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a mandibula $x chirurgie $7 D008334
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a osteointegrace $7 D016348
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a regresní analýza $7 D012044
650    _2
$a neparametrická statistika $7 D018709
650    _2
$a povrchové vlastnosti $7 D013499
650    _2
$a vibrace $7 D014732
650    _2
$a hojení ran $7 D014945
655    _2
$a klinické zkoušky $7 D016430
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Kopecká, Dana $7 xx0082714
700    1_
$a Brázda, Tomáš, $d 1979- $7 xx0131066
700    1_
$a Strnad, Jakub $7 xx0143465
700    1_
$a Capek, Lukas
700    1_
$a Slezák, Radovan, $d 1958- $7 jn20000402232
773    0_
$w MED00008478 $t The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants $x 1942-4434 $g Roč. 27, č. 3 (2012), s. 619-27
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22616056 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20130108 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20130414202127 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 963576 $s 798958
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2012 $b 27 $c 3 $d 619-27 $i 1942-4434 $m The International journal of oral and maxillofacial implants $n Int. j. oral maxillofac. implants $x MED00008478
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20130108

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...