-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Development of implant stability during early healing of immediately loaded implants
A. Simunek, D. Kopecka, T. Brazda, I. Strnad, L. Capek, R. Slezak
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, časopisecké články
PubMed
22616056
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- endoseální implantace zubů metody MeSH
- hojení ran MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mandibula chirurgie MeSH
- neparametrická statistika MeSH
- okamžité zatížení zubního implantátu MeSH
- osteointegrace MeSH
- povrchové vlastnosti MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- regresní analýza MeSH
- retence zubní protézy MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- vibrace MeSH
- zubní implantáty MeSH
- zubní protéza - design MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky MeSH
PURPOSE: To monitor the development of stability of immediately loaded implants during early healing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 90 interforaminally placed implants with an alkali-treated surface were considered. The stability of each implant was examined at placement and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, and 10 weeks after the surgery using resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and damping capacity measurement. The development of implant stability, focusing on the decrease in stability (as measured by implant stability quotient [ISQ]) and the interplay of primary (ISQ0) and secondary implant stability, was evaluated. The implants were divided into three groups based on primary stability: group L (ISQ0 < 68), group M (ISQ0 68 to72), and group H (ISQ0 > 72). Stability curves for each group were created and analyzed statistically. Implant stability measurement results gained with RFA and damping capacity were compared employing the Wilcoxon paired test, correlation coefficients, and regression analysis. The threshold for statistical significance was set at P < .05. RESULTS: The most pronounced decrease in ISQ values occurred 1 week after implant placement (mean decrease of 2.2 ISQ). During the 10-week experiment, mean ISQ rose by 5.5 in group L and by 1.3 in group M and dropped by 1.8 in group H (P < .001). The coefficient of determination R2 = 0.06 showed a weak dependence of RFA on the damping capacity (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Implants with low primary stability showed a significant increase in stability during healing. In contrast, implants with high primary stability lost some stability over time.
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc13000794
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20130414201839.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 130108s2012 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)22616056
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Šimůnek, Antonín, $d 1953- $7 nlk19990074122 $u Department of Dentistry, Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic. simunek@email.cz
- 245 10
- $a Development of implant stability during early healing of immediately loaded implants / $c A. Simunek, D. Kopecka, T. Brazda, I. Strnad, L. Capek, R. Slezak
- 520 9_
- $a PURPOSE: To monitor the development of stability of immediately loaded implants during early healing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 90 interforaminally placed implants with an alkali-treated surface were considered. The stability of each implant was examined at placement and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, and 10 weeks after the surgery using resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and damping capacity measurement. The development of implant stability, focusing on the decrease in stability (as measured by implant stability quotient [ISQ]) and the interplay of primary (ISQ0) and secondary implant stability, was evaluated. The implants were divided into three groups based on primary stability: group L (ISQ0 < 68), group M (ISQ0 68 to72), and group H (ISQ0 > 72). Stability curves for each group were created and analyzed statistically. Implant stability measurement results gained with RFA and damping capacity were compared employing the Wilcoxon paired test, correlation coefficients, and regression analysis. The threshold for statistical significance was set at P < .05. RESULTS: The most pronounced decrease in ISQ values occurred 1 week after implant placement (mean decrease of 2.2 ISQ). During the 10-week experiment, mean ISQ rose by 5.5 in group L and by 1.3 in group M and dropped by 1.8 in group H (P < .001). The coefficient of determination R2 = 0.06 showed a weak dependence of RFA on the damping capacity (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Implants with low primary stability showed a significant increase in stability during healing. In contrast, implants with high primary stability lost some stability over time.
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a endoseální implantace zubů $x metody $7 D003758
- 650 _2
- $a zubní implantáty $7 D015921
- 650 _2
- $a zubní protéza - design $7 D017267
- 650 _2
- $a retence zubní protézy $7 D017268
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a okamžité zatížení zubního implantátu $7 D057893
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a mandibula $x chirurgie $7 D008334
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a osteointegrace $7 D016348
- 650 _2
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
- 650 _2
- $a regresní analýza $7 D012044
- 650 _2
- $a neparametrická statistika $7 D018709
- 650 _2
- $a povrchové vlastnosti $7 D013499
- 650 _2
- $a vibrace $7 D014732
- 650 _2
- $a hojení ran $7 D014945
- 655 _2
- $a klinické zkoušky $7 D016430
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Kopecká, Dana $7 xx0082714
- 700 1_
- $a Brázda, Tomáš, $d 1979- $7 xx0131066
- 700 1_
- $a Strnad, Jakub $7 xx0143465
- 700 1_
- $a Capek, Lukas
- 700 1_
- $a Slezák, Radovan, $d 1958- $7 jn20000402232
- 773 0_
- $w MED00008478 $t The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants $x 1942-4434 $g Roč. 27, č. 3 (2012), s. 619-27
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22616056 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20130108 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20130414202127 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 963576 $s 798958
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2012 $b 27 $c 3 $d 619-27 $i 1942-4434 $m The International journal of oral and maxillofacial implants $n Int. j. oral maxillofac. implants $x MED00008478
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20130108