-
Something wrong with this record ?
Microscale separation methods for enzyme kinetics assays
T. Křížek, A. Kubíčková,
Language English Country Germany
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Review
NLK
ProQuest Central
from 2011-01-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2003-01-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2011-01-01 to 1 year ago
- MeSH
- Chromatography, Micellar Electrokinetic Capillary methods MeSH
- Electrophoresis, Capillary methods MeSH
- Enzyme Assays methods MeSH
- Isoelectric Focusing methods MeSH
- Isotachophoresis methods MeSH
- Capillary Electrochromatography methods MeSH
- Kinetics MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Miniaturization methods MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Review MeSH
Miniaturization continues to be one of the leading trends in analytical chemistry and one that brings advantages that can be particularly beneficial in biochemical research. Use of a miniaturized scale enables efficient analysis in a short time and requires very small amounts of samples, solvents, and reagents. This can result in a remarkable decrease in costs of enzyme kinetics studies, especially when expensive or rare enzymes and/or substrates are involved. Free zone electrophoresis is without a doubt the most common microscale separation technique for capillary and on-chip enzyme assays. Progress and applications in this field are reviewed frequently whereas other modes of separation, although successfully applied, receive only marginal interest in such publications. This review summarizes applications of less common modes of separation in capillary or chip formats, namely micellar electrokinetic chromatography, liquid chromatography, gel electrophoresis, isoelectric focusing, and isotachophoresis. Because these techniques are based on separation mechanisms different from those of free zone electrophoresis, they can be, and have been, successfully used in cases where zone electrophoresis fails. Advantages and drawbacks of these alternative separation techniques are discussed, as also are the difficulties encountered most often and solutions proposed by different research groups.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc13000960
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20130108124511.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 130108s2012 gw f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s00216-012-5744-x $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)22302169
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gw
- 100 1_
- $a Křížek, Tomáš $u Faculty of Science, Department of Analytical Chemistry, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Microscale separation methods for enzyme kinetics assays / $c T. Křížek, A. Kubíčková,
- 520 9_
- $a Miniaturization continues to be one of the leading trends in analytical chemistry and one that brings advantages that can be particularly beneficial in biochemical research. Use of a miniaturized scale enables efficient analysis in a short time and requires very small amounts of samples, solvents, and reagents. This can result in a remarkable decrease in costs of enzyme kinetics studies, especially when expensive or rare enzymes and/or substrates are involved. Free zone electrophoresis is without a doubt the most common microscale separation technique for capillary and on-chip enzyme assays. Progress and applications in this field are reviewed frequently whereas other modes of separation, although successfully applied, receive only marginal interest in such publications. This review summarizes applications of less common modes of separation in capillary or chip formats, namely micellar electrokinetic chromatography, liquid chromatography, gel electrophoresis, isoelectric focusing, and isotachophoresis. Because these techniques are based on separation mechanisms different from those of free zone electrophoresis, they can be, and have been, successfully used in cases where zone electrophoresis fails. Advantages and drawbacks of these alternative separation techniques are discussed, as also are the difficulties encountered most often and solutions proposed by different research groups.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a kapilární elektrochromatografie $x metody $7 D053801
- 650 _2
- $a chromatografie micelární elektrokinetická kapilární $x metody $7 D020374
- 650 _2
- $a elektroforéza kapilární $x metody $7 D019075
- 650 _2
- $a enzymatické testy $x metody $7 D057075
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a isoelektrická fokusace $x metody $7 D007525
- 650 _2
- $a izotachoforéza $x metody $7 D057625
- 650 _2
- $a kinetika $7 D007700
- 650 _2
- $a miniaturizace $x metody $7 D008904
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Kubíčková, Anna
- 773 0_
- $w MED00006638 $t Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry $x 1618-2650 $g Roč. 403, č. 8 (2012), s. 2185-95
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22302169 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20130108 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20130108124615 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 963742 $s 799124
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2012 $b 403 $c 8 $d 2185-95 $i 1618-2650 $m Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry $n Anal Bioanal Chem $x MED00006638
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20130108