-
Something wrong with this record ?
Tobacco leaves and roots differ in the expression of proline metabolism-related genes in the course of drought stress and subsequent recovery
J. Dobrá, R. Vanková, M. Havlová, AJ. Burman, J. Libus, H. Storchová,
Language English Country Germany
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- MeSH
- 1-Pyrroline-5-Carboxylate Dehydrogenase genetics metabolism MeSH
- Time Factors MeSH
- Stress, Physiological genetics MeSH
- Transcription, Genetic MeSH
- Plant Roots genetics metabolism MeSH
- Abscisic Acid metabolism MeSH
- Plant Leaves genetics metabolism MeSH
- Droughts MeSH
- Osmotic Pressure MeSH
- Proline genetics metabolism MeSH
- Proline Oxidase genetics metabolism MeSH
- Gene Expression Regulation, Enzymologic MeSH
- Gene Expression Regulation, Plant MeSH
- Genes, Plant genetics MeSH
- Plant Proteins genetics metabolism MeSH
- Nicotiana genetics metabolism MeSH
- Water physiology MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
In plants, members of gene families differ in function and mode of regulation. Fine-tuning of the expression of individual genes helps plants to cope with a variable environment. Genes encoding proline dehydrogenase (PDH), the key enzyme in proline degradation, and the proline biosynthetic enzyme, Δ(1)-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase (P5CS), play an important role in responses to osmotic and drought stresses. We compared the expression patterns of three PDH and two putative P5CS genes during drought stress progression and subsequent recovery. Whereas the NtPDH1 gene was affected little by dehydration or rehydration, the NtPDH2 gene responded rapidly to both conditions, and was down-regulated under drought. The CIG1 gene, encoding cytokinin-inducible PDH, exhibited an intermediate transcription pattern. Whereas P5CS B was not affected by the stress conditions, the P5CS A gene was highly up-regulated during drought stress. CIG1 and NtPDH1 transcription was not activated, and P5CS A was only partially reduced in leaves within 24-h after rehydration, a re-watering period sufficient for large physiological changes to occur. The lack of activation of tobacco PDH genes and incomplete reduction of the P5CS A gene in leaves within 24-h of rehydration may reflect the need for the protection of plants to potential subsequent stresses. The data indicate that recovery is a specific physiological process following different patterns in leaves and roots.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc13001019
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20130110112000.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 130108s2011 gw f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.jplph.2011.02.009 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)21481968
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gw
- 100 1_
- $a Dobrá, Jana $u Institute of Experimental Botany, v.v.i., Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Rozvojová 263, 165 02 Prague 6, Lysolaje, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Tobacco leaves and roots differ in the expression of proline metabolism-related genes in the course of drought stress and subsequent recovery / $c J. Dobrá, R. Vanková, M. Havlová, AJ. Burman, J. Libus, H. Storchová,
- 520 9_
- $a In plants, members of gene families differ in function and mode of regulation. Fine-tuning of the expression of individual genes helps plants to cope with a variable environment. Genes encoding proline dehydrogenase (PDH), the key enzyme in proline degradation, and the proline biosynthetic enzyme, Δ(1)-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase (P5CS), play an important role in responses to osmotic and drought stresses. We compared the expression patterns of three PDH and two putative P5CS genes during drought stress progression and subsequent recovery. Whereas the NtPDH1 gene was affected little by dehydration or rehydration, the NtPDH2 gene responded rapidly to both conditions, and was down-regulated under drought. The CIG1 gene, encoding cytokinin-inducible PDH, exhibited an intermediate transcription pattern. Whereas P5CS B was not affected by the stress conditions, the P5CS A gene was highly up-regulated during drought stress. CIG1 and NtPDH1 transcription was not activated, and P5CS A was only partially reduced in leaves within 24-h after rehydration, a re-watering period sufficient for large physiological changes to occur. The lack of activation of tobacco PDH genes and incomplete reduction of the P5CS A gene in leaves within 24-h of rehydration may reflect the need for the protection of plants to potential subsequent stresses. The data indicate that recovery is a specific physiological process following different patterns in leaves and roots.
- 650 _2
- $a 1-pyrrolin-5-karboxylátdehydrogenasa $x genetika $x metabolismus $7 D050842
- 650 _2
- $a kyselina abscisová $x metabolismus $7 D000040
- 650 _2
- $a období sucha $7 D055864
- 650 _2
- $a regulace genové exprese enzymů $7 D015971
- 650 _2
- $a regulace genové exprese u rostlin $7 D018506
- 650 _2
- $a rostlinné geny $x genetika $7 D017343
- 650 _2
- $a osmotický tlak $7 D009997
- 650 _2
- $a listy rostlin $x genetika $x metabolismus $7 D018515
- 650 _2
- $a rostlinné proteiny $x genetika $x metabolismus $7 D010940
- 650 _2
- $a kořeny rostlin $x genetika $x metabolismus $7 D018517
- 650 _2
- $a prolin $x genetika $x metabolismus $7 D011392
- 650 _2
- $a prolinoxidasa $x genetika $x metabolismus $7 D011394
- 650 _2
- $a fyziologický stres $x genetika $7 D013312
- 650 _2
- $a časové faktory $7 D013997
- 650 _2
- $a tabák $x genetika $x metabolismus $7 D014026
- 650 _2
- $a genetická transkripce $7 D014158
- 650 _2
- $a voda $x fyziologie $7 D014867
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Vanková, Radomira
- 700 1_
- $a Havlová, Marie
- 700 1_
- $a Burman, Adlai J
- 700 1_
- $a Libus, Jiři
- 700 1_
- $a Storchová, Helena
- 773 0_
- $w MED00008138 $t Journal of plant physiology $x 1618-1328 $g Roč. 168, č. 13 (2011), s. 1588-97
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21481968 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20130108 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20130110112106 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 963801 $s 799183
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2011 $b 168 $c 13 $d 1588-97 $i 1618-1328 $m Journal of plant physiology $n J. plant physiol. $x MED00008138
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20130108