-
Something wrong with this record ?
Pre- and postnatal parental smoking and wheeze in infancy: cross cultural differences. Avon Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) Study Team, European Longitudinal Study of Pregnancy and Childhood (ELSPAC) Co-ordinating Centre
AJ Henderson, A Sherriff, K Northstone, L Kukla, D Hruba
Language English Country Denmark
Document type Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Grant support
NE6143
MZ0
CEP Register
NLK
Free Medical Journals
from 1994 to 18 months ago
Open Access Digital Library
from 1988-01-01
- MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Infant MeSH
- Smoking * adverse effects MeSH
- Cultural Characteristics * MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Longitudinal Studies MeSH
- Odds Ratio MeSH
- Surveys and Questionnaires MeSH
- Respiratory Sounds * etiology MeSH
- Parents * MeSH
- Cross-Cultural Comparison * MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Tobacco Smoke Pollution * adverse effects MeSH
- Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects * MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Infant MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Geographicals
- Czech Republic MeSH
- United Kingdom MeSH
In longitudinal cohort studies, the relationships between prenatal and postnatal tobacco smoke exposure and infant wheezing illnesses were compared in two geographically defined populations in Avon, UK and Brno and Znojmo in the South Moravian Region of the Czech Republic. Pregnant females living in defined regions and with expected dates of delivery between defined dates were recruited. Females completed self-report questionnaires during pregnancy and when their infant was 6 months old. For this analysis, responses to questions about smoking during pregnancy, environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure and reported wheezing illnesses of infants at 6 months after birth were used. Odds ratios for wheeze in relation to the smoking variables were calculated with adjustment for potential confounding effects. The prevalence of smoking during pregnancy was higher in Avon (17.5%) than the Czech Republic (7.1%). Exposure of infants to ETS during the first 6 months after birth was also reported to be higher in Avon (35.5%) than the Czech Republic (9.7%). The prevalence of reported wheezing by 6 months of age was 21.4% in Avon and 10.3% in Brno and Znojmo. In Avon, there was a significant relationship between infant wheeze and maternal smoking during pregnancy (odds ratio (95% confidence interval) 1.30 (1.09-1.56), p=0.004) but not with environmental exposure after birth (1.11 (0.98-1.25)). In contrast, in Brno and Znojmo in the Czech Republic, there was a significant relationship between infant wheeze and ETS exposure (1.66 (1.17-2.36), p=0.04) but not with maternal smoking during pregnancy (0.99 (0.64-1.55)). This study demonstrated an apparent difference in the associations between prenatal and postnatal tobacco smoke exposure and infant wheezing illnesses in two populations with different smoking prevalence. The relationships were independent of a number of potential confounding variables that have been associated with infant wheezing. Possible explanations of these observations include dose-related effects of prenatal and postnatal tobacco smoke exposure of infants.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc13013220
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20130409144432.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 130409s2001 dk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1183/09031936.01.00012401 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)11529291
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2 $b cze
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a dk
- 100 1_
- $a Henderson, A.J. $u Institute of Child Health, University of Bristol, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, UK.
- 245 10
- $a Pre- and postnatal parental smoking and wheeze in infancy: cross cultural differences. Avon Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) Study Team, European Longitudinal Study of Pregnancy and Childhood (ELSPAC) Co-ordinating Centre / $c AJ Henderson, A Sherriff, K Northstone, L Kukla, D Hruba
- 520 9_
- $a In longitudinal cohort studies, the relationships between prenatal and postnatal tobacco smoke exposure and infant wheezing illnesses were compared in two geographically defined populations in Avon, UK and Brno and Znojmo in the South Moravian Region of the Czech Republic. Pregnant females living in defined regions and with expected dates of delivery between defined dates were recruited. Females completed self-report questionnaires during pregnancy and when their infant was 6 months old. For this analysis, responses to questions about smoking during pregnancy, environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure and reported wheezing illnesses of infants at 6 months after birth were used. Odds ratios for wheeze in relation to the smoking variables were calculated with adjustment for potential confounding effects. The prevalence of smoking during pregnancy was higher in Avon (17.5%) than the Czech Republic (7.1%). Exposure of infants to ETS during the first 6 months after birth was also reported to be higher in Avon (35.5%) than the Czech Republic (9.7%). The prevalence of reported wheezing by 6 months of age was 21.4% in Avon and 10.3% in Brno and Znojmo. In Avon, there was a significant relationship between infant wheeze and maternal smoking during pregnancy (odds ratio (95% confidence interval) 1.30 (1.09-1.56), p=0.004) but not with environmental exposure after birth (1.11 (0.98-1.25)). In contrast, in Brno and Znojmo in the Czech Republic, there was a significant relationship between infant wheeze and ETS exposure (1.66 (1.17-2.36), p=0.04) but not with maternal smoking during pregnancy (0.99 (0.64-1.55)). This study demonstrated an apparent difference in the associations between prenatal and postnatal tobacco smoke exposure and infant wheezing illnesses in two populations with different smoking prevalence. The relationships were independent of a number of potential confounding variables that have been associated with infant wheezing. Possible explanations of these observations include dose-related effects of prenatal and postnatal tobacco smoke exposure of infants.
- 590 __
- $a bohemika - dle Pubmed
- 650 02
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 12
- $a srovnání kultur $7 D003431
- 650 12
- $a kulturní charakteristiky $7 D003466
- 650 02
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 02
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 02
- $a kojenec $7 D007223
- 650 02
- $a longitudinální studie $7 D008137
- 650 02
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 02
- $a odds ratio $7 D016017
- 650 12
- $a rodiče $7 D010290
- 650 02
- $a těhotenství $7 D011247
- 650 12
- $a zpožděný efekt prenatální expozice $7 D011297
- 650 02
- $a průzkumy a dotazníky $7 D011795
- 650 12
- $a respirační zvuky $x etiologie $7 D012135
- 650 12
- $a kouření $x škodlivé účinky $7 D012907
- 650 12
- $a znečištění tabákovým kouřem $x škodlivé účinky $7 D014028
- 651 _2
- $a Česká republika $x epidemiologie $7 D018153
- 651 _2
- $a Spojené království $x epidemiologie $7 D006113
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Sherriff, A.
- 700 1_
- $a Northstone, K.
- 700 1_
- $a Kukla, Lubomír, $d 1955- $7 skuk0003566
- 700 1_
- $a Hrubá, Drahoslava, $d 1938- $7 jn20000401088
- 773 0_
- $t The European respiratory journal $x 0903-1936 $g Roč. 18, č. 2 (2001), s. 323-329 $p Eur Respir J $w MED00001660
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b B 1607 $y 3 $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20130409112433 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20130409144700 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 976345 $s 811508
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BMC __
- $a 2001 $b 18 $c 2 $d 323-329 $i 0903-1936 $m The European respiratory journal $x MED00001660 $n Eur Respir J
- GRA __
- $a NE6143 $p MZ0
- LZP __
- $a NLK 2013-04/lpbo
