• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Combined exposure of carps (Cyprinus carpio L.) to cyanobacterial biomass and white spot disease

M. Palikova, S. Navratil, I. Papezikova, P. Ambroz, T. Vesely, D. Pokorova, J. Mares, O. Adamovsky, L. Navratil, R. Kopp,

. 2012 ; 33 Suppl 3 () : 77-83.

Jazyk angličtina Země Švédsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc13023997

OBJECTIVES: Under environmental conditions, fish can be exposed to multiple stressors including natural toxins and infectious agents at the same time. This study brings new knowledge on the effects of controlled exposure to multiple stressors in fish. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that influence of cyanobacterial biomass and an infection agent represented by the white spot disease can combine to enhance the effects on fish. METHODS: Common carps were divided into four groups, each with 40 specimens for 20 days: control group, cyanobacterial biomass exposed group, Ichthyophthirius multifiliis-infected fish (Ich) and cyanobacterial biomass-exposed fish + Ichthyophthirius multifiliis-infected fish. During the experiment we evaluated the clinical signs, mortality, selected haematological parameters, immune parameters and toxin accumulation. RESULTS: There was no mortality in control fish and cyanobacterial biomass-exposed fish. One specimen died in Ichthyophthirius multifiliis-infected fish and the combined exposure resulted in the death of 13 specimens. The whole leukocyte counts (WBC) of the control group did not show any significant differences. Cyanobacteria alone caused a significant increase of the WBC on day 13 (p≤0.05) and on day 20 (p≤0.01). Also, I. multifiliis caused a significant elevation of WBC (p≤0.01) on day 20. Co-exposition resulted in WBC increased on day 13 and decrease on day 20, but the changes were not significant. It is evident from the differential leukocyte counts that while the increase of WBC in the group exposed to cyanobacteria was caused by elevation of lymphocytes, the increase in the group infected by I. multifiliis was due to the increase of myeloid cells. It well corresponds with the integral of chemiluminescence in the group infected by I. multifiliis, which is significantly elevated on day 20 in comparison with all other groups. CONCLUSIONS: We can confirm additive action of different agents on the immune system of fish. While single agents seemed to stimulate the immune response, the combination of both caused immunosuppression.

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc13023997
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20131002122803.0
007      
ta
008      
130703s2012 sw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
035    __
$a (PubMed)23353848
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sw
100    1_
$a Palikova, Miroslava $u Department of Veterinary Ecology and Environmental Protection, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech Republic. palikovam@vfu.cz
245    10
$a Combined exposure of carps (Cyprinus carpio L.) to cyanobacterial biomass and white spot disease / $c M. Palikova, S. Navratil, I. Papezikova, P. Ambroz, T. Vesely, D. Pokorova, J. Mares, O. Adamovsky, L. Navratil, R. Kopp,
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVES: Under environmental conditions, fish can be exposed to multiple stressors including natural toxins and infectious agents at the same time. This study brings new knowledge on the effects of controlled exposure to multiple stressors in fish. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that influence of cyanobacterial biomass and an infection agent represented by the white spot disease can combine to enhance the effects on fish. METHODS: Common carps were divided into four groups, each with 40 specimens for 20 days: control group, cyanobacterial biomass exposed group, Ichthyophthirius multifiliis-infected fish (Ich) and cyanobacterial biomass-exposed fish + Ichthyophthirius multifiliis-infected fish. During the experiment we evaluated the clinical signs, mortality, selected haematological parameters, immune parameters and toxin accumulation. RESULTS: There was no mortality in control fish and cyanobacterial biomass-exposed fish. One specimen died in Ichthyophthirius multifiliis-infected fish and the combined exposure resulted in the death of 13 specimens. The whole leukocyte counts (WBC) of the control group did not show any significant differences. Cyanobacteria alone caused a significant increase of the WBC on day 13 (p≤0.05) and on day 20 (p≤0.01). Also, I. multifiliis caused a significant elevation of WBC (p≤0.01) on day 20. Co-exposition resulted in WBC increased on day 13 and decrease on day 20, but the changes were not significant. It is evident from the differential leukocyte counts that while the increase of WBC in the group exposed to cyanobacteria was caused by elevation of lymphocytes, the increase in the group infected by I. multifiliis was due to the increase of myeloid cells. It well corresponds with the integral of chemiluminescence in the group infected by I. multifiliis, which is significantly elevated on day 20 in comparison with all other groups. CONCLUSIONS: We can confirm additive action of different agents on the immune system of fish. While single agents seemed to stimulate the immune response, the combination of both caused immunosuppression.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a bakteriální toxiny $x toxicita $7 D001427
650    _2
$a biomasa $7 D018533
650    _2
$a karcinogeny $x toxicita $7 D002273
650    _2
$a kapři $x imunologie $7 D002347
650    _2
$a Ciliophora $7 D016798
650    _2
$a sinice $x růst a vývoj $x patogenita $7 D000458
650    _2
$a nemoci ryb $x imunologie $x mikrobiologie $x parazitologie $7 D005393
650    _2
$a imunitní systém $x imunologie $7 D007107
650    _2
$a počet leukocytů $7 D007958
650    _2
$a mořské toxiny $x toxicita $7 D008387
650    _2
$a mikrocystiny $x toxicita $7 D052998
650    _2
$a protozoální infekce $x imunologie $7 D011528
650    _2
$a fyziologický stres $x imunologie $7 D013312
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Navratil, Stanislav $u -
700    1_
$a Papezikova, Ivana $u -
700    1_
$a Ambroz, Petr $u - $7 gn_A_00005399
700    1_
$a Vesely, Tomas $u -
700    1_
$a Pokorova, Dagmar $u -
700    1_
$a Mares, Jan $u -
700    1_
$a Adamovský, Ondřej $u - $7 xx0084398
700    1_
$a Navratil, Lukas $u -
700    1_
$a Kopp, Radovan $u -
773    0_
$w MED00168352 $t Neuro endocrinology letters $x 0172-780X $g Roč. 33 Suppl 3(2012), s. 77-83
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23353848 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20130703 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20131002123321 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 987677 $s 822377
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2012 $b 33 Suppl 3 $d 77-83 $i 0172-780X $m Neuro-endocrinology letters $n Neuro-endocrinol. lett. $x MED00168352
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20130703

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...