• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Statistical analysis of dose-volume profiles and its implication for radiation therapy planning in prostate carcinoma

J. Vanasek, K. Odrazka, M. Dolezel, I. Kolarova, J. Jarkovsky, T. Pavlik, A. Hlavka, L. Dusek,

. 2013 ; 86 (4) : 769-76.

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc13031480

PURPOSE: The study aimed to analyze the dose-volume profiles of 3-dimensional radiation therapy (3D-CRT) and intensity modulated RT (IMRT) in the treatment of prostate carcinoma and to specify the profiles responsible for the development of gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In the period 1997 to 2007, 483 patients with prostate carcinoma in stage T1-3 N0 (pN0) M0 were treated with definitive RT. Two groups of patients were defined for the analysis: the 3D-CRT group (n=305 patients) and the IMRT group (n=178 patients). In the entire cohort of 483 patients, the median follow-up time reached 4.4 years (range, 2.0-11.7 years). The cumulative absolute and relative volumes of irradiated rectum exposed to a given dose (area under the dose-volume curve, AUC) were estimated. The receiver operating characteristic analysis was then used to search for the optimal dose and volume cutoff points with the potential to distinguish patients with enhanced or escalated toxicity. RESULTS: Despite the application of high doses (78-82 Gy) in the IMRT group, GI toxicity was lower in that group than in the group treated by 3D-CRT with prescribed doses of 70 to 74 Gy. Both RT methods showed specific rectal dose-volume distribution curves. The total AUC values for IMRT were significantly lower than those for 3D-CRT. Furthermore, IMRT significantly decreased the rectal volume receiving low to intermediate radiation doses in comparison with 3D-CRT; specific cutoff limits predictable for the level of GI toxicity are presented and defined in our work. CONCLUSIONS: Total area under the dose-volume profiles and specific cutoff points in low and intermediate dose levels have significant predictive potential toward the RT GI toxicity. In treatment planning, it seems that it is valuable to take into consideration the entire dose-volume primary distribution.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc13031480
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20131007120927.0
007      
ta
008      
131002s2013 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.018 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)23628133
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Vanasek, Jaroslav $u Department of Radiation and Clinical Oncology, Multiscan Pardubice, Pardubice, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Statistical analysis of dose-volume profiles and its implication for radiation therapy planning in prostate carcinoma / $c J. Vanasek, K. Odrazka, M. Dolezel, I. Kolarova, J. Jarkovsky, T. Pavlik, A. Hlavka, L. Dusek,
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: The study aimed to analyze the dose-volume profiles of 3-dimensional radiation therapy (3D-CRT) and intensity modulated RT (IMRT) in the treatment of prostate carcinoma and to specify the profiles responsible for the development of gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In the period 1997 to 2007, 483 patients with prostate carcinoma in stage T1-3 N0 (pN0) M0 were treated with definitive RT. Two groups of patients were defined for the analysis: the 3D-CRT group (n=305 patients) and the IMRT group (n=178 patients). In the entire cohort of 483 patients, the median follow-up time reached 4.4 years (range, 2.0-11.7 years). The cumulative absolute and relative volumes of irradiated rectum exposed to a given dose (area under the dose-volume curve, AUC) were estimated. The receiver operating characteristic analysis was then used to search for the optimal dose and volume cutoff points with the potential to distinguish patients with enhanced or escalated toxicity. RESULTS: Despite the application of high doses (78-82 Gy) in the IMRT group, GI toxicity was lower in that group than in the group treated by 3D-CRT with prescribed doses of 70 to 74 Gy. Both RT methods showed specific rectal dose-volume distribution curves. The total AUC values for IMRT were significantly lower than those for 3D-CRT. Furthermore, IMRT significantly decreased the rectal volume receiving low to intermediate radiation doses in comparison with 3D-CRT; specific cutoff limits predictable for the level of GI toxicity are presented and defined in our work. CONCLUSIONS: Total area under the dose-volume profiles and specific cutoff points in low and intermediate dose levels have significant predictive potential toward the RT GI toxicity. In treatment planning, it seems that it is valuable to take into consideration the entire dose-volume primary distribution.
650    _2
$a adenokarcinom $x patologie $x radioterapie $7 D000230
650    _2
$a plocha pod křivkou $7 D019540
650    _2
$a následné studie $7 D005500
650    _2
$a gastrointestinální trakt $x účinky záření $7 D041981
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a nádory prostaty $x patologie $x radioterapie $7 D011471
650    _2
$a ROC křivka $7 D012372
650    _2
$a radiační poranění $x etiologie $7 D011832
650    _2
$a celková dávka radioterapie $7 D011879
650    _2
$a plánování radioterapie pomocí počítače $x metody $7 D011880
650    _2
$a konformní radioterapie $x škodlivé účinky $x metody $7 D020266
650    _2
$a radioterapie s modulovanou intenzitou $x škodlivé účinky $x metody $7 D050397
650    _2
$a rektum $x účinky záření $7 D012007
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Odrazka, Karel $u -
700    1_
$a Dolezel, Martin $u -
700    1_
$a Kolarova, Iveta $u -
700    1_
$a Jarkovsky, Jiri $u -
700    1_
$a Pavlik, Tomas $u -
700    1_
$a Hlavka, Ales $u -
700    1_
$a Dusek, Ladislav $u -
773    0_
$w MED00002371 $t International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics $x 1879-355X $g Roč. 86, č. 4 (2013), s. 769-76
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23628133 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20131002 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20131007121448 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 995567 $s 829925
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2013 $b 86 $c 4 $d 769-76 $i 1879-355X $m International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics $n Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys $x MED00002371
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20131002

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...